Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Bug#517856: live motion in xen fails due to wrong directory"
1997 Aug 18
0
(LONG) Please help. Subnet browsing 1.9.17alpha5 (LONG)
Trust me or not, I solve all my browsing problem doing this:
hosts allow = 193.190.195.64/255.255.255.192
193.190.195.32/255.255.255.224
193.190.194.0/255.255.255.0 193.190.192.0/255.255.255.0 localhost
;!!!!!
interfaces = 193.190.195.69/255.255.255.192
;!!!!!
;remote announce =
Before adding interfaces, just the browsing in the first subnet was OK!
I'm running Samba 1.9.16p11 on AIX
2007 Jan 23
2
imap core dump with rc18
Hi,
I had a core dump while using rc18. Here are the backtraces:
Jan 23 01:01:44 rouge dovecot: IMAP(user): file mail-index-view.c: line
386 (_view_lookup_uid_range): assertion failed: (*last_seq_r >=
*first_seq_r)
Jan 23 01:01:44 rouge dovecot: IMAP(user): Raw backtrace: [0x47f25b00000000]
Jan 23 01:01:44 rouge dovecot: child 24319 (imap) killed with signal 6
Core was generated by
2003 Aug 20
1
aide
Bonjour,
J'aimerais savoir si quelqu'un pourrait m'aider en ce qui concerne l'utilisation
du package waveslim.
Je voudrais savoir comment on fait pour revenir a un signal d'origine lorsque
l'on dispose de coefficients de detail et d'approximation.
Merci d'avance
Tuleau Christine
(christine.tuleau at math.u-psud.fr)
2019 Oct 12
0
Is it a way to upgrade CentOS 7 to 8?
Ok, thanks. it?s now very clear?
I must stay in CentOS 7 as long as possible?
Thanks and best regards
> Le 12 oct. 2019 ? 20:49, Ljubomir Ljubojevic <centos at plnet.rs> a ?crit :
>
> On 10/12/19 8:19 PM, Pierre Malard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I?m looking for a method to upgrade my centos 7 servers to 8 and I don?t find anything to do that!
>>
>> I?m a
2010 Oct 07
1
Forecasting with R/Need Help. Steps shown below with the imaginary data
1. This is an imaginary data on monthly outcomes of 2 years and I want to forecast the outcome for next 12 months of next year.
data Data1;
input Yr Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec;
datalines;
2008 12 13 12 14 13 12 11 15 10 12 12 12
2009 12 13 12 14 13 12 11 15 10 12 12 12
;
run;
I converted the above data into the below format to use it in R as it was giving error: asking
2019 Feb 06
2
Pb with bounding
Hi,
We have a Dell server with 4 Ethernet interface. I would to aggregate them in a bond. Everything work but the default gateway doesn?t work on the ? bond0 ? interface and I have no links.
My configuration:
- CentOS 7:
:/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts# uname -a
Linux nas-mtd2 3.10.0-957.5.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Feb 1 14:54:57 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
- NetworkManager disabled:
2013 Jun 18
1
deSolve question
Dear All
wonder if you could provide some insights on the following: currently I have this code which produces the expected results:
require(deSolve)
pars <- list(k = 0.08,v=15)
intimes <- c(0,0.5,12)
input <- c(800,0,0)
forc <- approxfun(intimes, input, method="constant", rule=2)
derivs <- function(t, state, pars) {
inp <- forc(t)
dy1 <- - pars$k * state[1]
2010 Feb 08
1
Big send/receive hangs on 2009.06
So, I was running my full backup last night, backing up my main data
pool zp1, and it seems to have hung.
Any suggestions for additional data gathering?
-bash-3.2$ zpool status zp1
pool: zp1
state: ONLINE
status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can
still be used, but some features are unavailable.
action: Upgrade the pool using ''zpool
2011 Feb 08
1
Simulation of Multivariate Fractional Gaussian Noise and Fractional Brownian Motion
Dear R Helpers,
I have searched for any R package or code for simulating multivariate
fractional Brownian motion (mFBM) or multivariate fractional Gaussian noise
(mFGN) when a covariance matrix are given. Unfortunately, I could not find
such a package or code.
Can you suggest any solution for multivariate FBM and FGN simulation? Thank
you for your help.
Best Regards,
Ryan
-----
Wonsang You
2009 Sep 25
2
choppy motion/rectangles
Greetings.!
In rapid action frames, I see lots of small rectangles which many
together render a choppy sense of motion. I've attached screenshots in
attempts to convey what I mean:
http://24.16.26.121/screenshots/images/1253914810.jpg
http://24.16.26.121/screenshots/images/1253914788.jpg
I understand the lack of h/w acceleration and such, but I feel this
can go away. If I am at all
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 6/6] i386 virtualization - Attempt to clean up pgtable code motion
* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote:
> Virtualization aware Linux kernels may need to redefine functions which write
> to hardware page tables at the sub-architecture layer. Previously, this was
> done by encapsulation in a split mach-xxx/pgtable-{2|3}level-ops.h file, but
> having 8 pgtable header files is simply unacceptable. This goes some ways
> towards cleaning that up
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 6/6] i386 virtualization - Attempt to clean up pgtable code motion
* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote:
> Virtualization aware Linux kernels may need to redefine functions which write
> to hardware page tables at the sub-architecture layer. Previously, this was
> done by encapsulation in a split mach-xxx/pgtable-{2|3}level-ops.h file, but
> having 8 pgtable header files is simply unacceptable. This goes some ways
> towards cleaning that up
[LLVMdev] A question about GetElementPtr common subexpression elimination/loop invariant code motion
2007 Jan 29
0
[LLVMdev] A question about GetElementPtr common subexpression elimination/loop invariant code motion
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Gil Dogon wrote:
> Now the problem with this code , is that the calculation of the address
> mat[i][j] which is done by the (two) getelementptr instructions
> is quite expensive (involving at least two multiplications and one
> addition) hence it actualy should have been moved out of the inner loop.
Right.
> and not twice. Anyway this is just a syptom of a
2011 Feb 08
0
[LLVMdev] A question about LICM (Loop Invariant Code Motion)
Hi Yuelu,
> After tracking the LICM pass, I find that both loads are loop
> invariant, and canSinkOrHoist() also returns true; however the
> difference is at Instruction::isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(),
> for load from function parameter pointer, it return false; with load
> from a global var pointer, it returns true. As a result no hoist
> happens for a load *fp:
the function
2011 Feb 08
1
[LLVMdev] A question about LICM (Loop Invariant Code Motion)
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Yuelu,
>
>> After tracking the LICM pass, I find that both loads are loop
>> invariant, and canSinkOrHoist() also returns true; however the
>> difference is at Instruction::isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(),
>> for load from function parameter pointer, it return false; with load
>>
2013 Jun 27
0
gspca and motion
We recently rebooted a lot of systems with the new kernel in 6.4,
2.6.32-358.11.1.el6.x86_64. Suddenly, we're having real problems with our
cheap surveillance cameras in the "computer labs". What I see of video and
jpg is only about 20%-25% of the top of the picture, and the rest is
green. When the service starts, I see, in both dmesg and
/var/log/messages,
gspca: bandwidth not wide
2014 Jan 30
0
Anyone using motion in 6.5?
Kernel 2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64. Anyone using motion, or in some other
way using the gspca_zc3xx driver? Just in the last week or two, I've
started getting error messages in my log
Jan 30 16:53:20 <servername> kernel: gspca: frame overflow 33180 > 32768
The > 32k size varies, all 33xxx.
mark
2014 Feb 01
0
Motion Detecting Camera
mark wrote
With the continuing annoyance from motion, my manager's asked me to go
looking again for a video surveillance appliance: basically, a
motion-detecting DVR and cameras. The big thing, of course, is a) price
(this is a US federal gov't agency, and being civilian, money is *tight*,
don't give me the libertarian/GOP line about how freely we spend,
thankyouverymuch), b) it has
2018 Apr 12
0
motion
Got a CentOS 7 box running motion. Selinux is complaining that one of the
scripts motion runs is mislabeled. Here's what it is.
system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /home/motion/bin/on_move_end
Now, ~motion is NFS mounted, and we've got use_nfs_home_dirs --> on, so
what *would* the proper label be, or do I really need to create a policy
for this?
mark
2019 Feb 25
0
Policy issue: C7 and motion
Not sure who's package let an error slip in, but I don't believe I've had
this issue before: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/motion from map access
on the chr_file /dev/video1
Yes, that should be allowed by default.
mark