similar to: Trademark registration

http://blogs.computerworld.com/15082/omg_microsoft_patents_sudo_linux_and_macos_dead?source=CTWNLE_nlt_dailyam_2009-11-12 -- thanks ./francis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091112/1061174b/attachment-0003.html>

Sprint Nextel is sueing vonage, voiceglo and theglobe.com for infringing on VoIP patents. Sprint Nextel claims to have about 100 patents on VoIP technologies. Does anyone know which ones this article is talking about, and if so does asterisk have any of those features? The reason I am asking is that the article is vague, Vonage uses a fairly standard codec set, I dont know about the others.

I've dug down as far as I could on www.uspto.gov for anything remotely close to what is going on with Verizon and all searches end with only two possibilities in regards to what is going on. So unless the patent was issued to someone else and Verizon bought it, these are the only two possible patents this case could be based on... US 7,142,646 B2 Voice mail integration with instant

Hi, I have a dataset called 'fish'. fish$Species returns extract 1. When I use fish$Species != c("CRA","PHC"), i.e. I want all species except "CRA" and "PHC", I get extract 2 which is blatantly wrong. Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong? Regards, James EXTRACT 1 > fish$Species [1] ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB

Buenas tarde a todo en s: Tenia la versión de R 3.6 y utilizaba la paquetería de pdftools para extraer información de archivos en pdf actualice la versión 3.6.1 y ya no reconoce la paquetería alguien que me pueda ayudar. Prácticamente no reconoce las funciones de pdftools library(pdftools) library(stringr)? library(NLP)? library(tm)? library(tesseract)? library(magick)?

Hi all, <p>i have readed all the realy sad stuff about software patents in europe and what allread exists. There is one side related to speex and i dont know if this is allready discussed here. Take a look at: http://swpat.ffii.org/patents/effects/voip/index.en.html Is speex realy petant free or does patent free only means that is is not patent by the speex authors? Who have checked that

Hi everyone, I am working on a Rails application with photo upload capablility and I need to add some bulk ulpoad tool. I decided for using a zip file with JPEG pictures inside. The zip would be uploaded, then extracted into some temp directory with the help of rubyzip extension. Then all the photo files should be copied into their final places in the file system. I am interested in your

Hi all, I'm running an if else loop to normalize my data to a known control. I have calculated values that need to be subtracted from each treatment applied. I'm trying this within a for loop with if and else commands to apply to correct subtraction. This is done as follows: attach(data.2013) #Normalize to known control for(i in signal2) { if(t.tr=="Pst 24")

Emilio Ahora cuando quiero instalar los paquetes pdftools, magick y otros más me salen el siguiente error WARNING: Rtools is required to build R packages but is not currently installed. Please download and install the appropriate version of Rtools before proceeding: https://cran.rstudio.com/bin/windows/Rtools/ Installing package into ?C:/Users/bdominguez/Documents/R/win-library/3.6? (as ?lib?

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Am 19.10.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Chris Lattner via llvm-dev: >> >> Unfortunately, adding the Apache CLA also has several disadvantages >> as well: >> >> - It adds new barriers for new contributors to LLVM. We don’t >> currently have a process where you

I'd like to address several issues raised by people in relation to my notice of the ssh(R) trademark to the OpenSSH group. Also, I would like to make a proposal to the community for resolving this issue (included at the end). First, I'll answer a number of questions and arguments presented in the discussion. > "the SSH Corp trademark registration in the US is for a logo

Hi folks XenSource published a trademark policy[1]. I don't think we will be able to follow it if we want to support installation of different versions at the same time. Bastian [1]: http://www.xensource.com/company/legal.html -- There are some things worth dying for. -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

Hi, I usually stay away from issues like this, basically because I'm not a lawyer (and don't want to be one), and I don't have a real interest in these issues. Quoting Tatu : > We also have a trademark pending on the Secure Shell mark This seriously undermines the IETF standard draft. It's the same as registering 'milk' as a trademark. Both Secure and Shell are

PodServe (http://www.pod-serve.com) is written using ruby on rails. We host audio and movie files for users, but first they have to upload the files to our servers. Most of our users are non-technical so ftp is not an option - instead they use a browser based http upload. We have lots of of problems including (according to our engineer): "Upload large files thought http always was a

Hi. My plan would be: 1w Study sources of Polly and LLVM docs relating to analysis. 2w Create tests which demonstrate problems with NSW/NUW 3-4w Fix the handling of wrap overflows. 5w Complete middle term paperwork. 6w Create tests for each of cases which are not currently optimized (e.g. have min/max, sext/zext, trunc or unsigned comparisons in the loop bounds or memory accesses). 7w Learn how

A new version of httpd is available for CentOS-3 i386 This fixes a missed trademark issue in previous build. https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710 refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.src.rpm yum update httpd will be

I would also like to mention that when I released TTSSH in May 1998, I had no concerns about violating any trademarks because I observed that the name "SSH" was already being used by several different parties for different purposes --- as the name of Ylonen's original SSH package and its derivatives, as the name of the protocol, and as a component of names of other implementations

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64 Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11561-1 Severity: serious It seems Xen has a similar trademark policy as the much discussed Mozilla one. Specifically http://www.xensource.com/xen-tm-faq.html says: | 16. If I distribute a changed version of the Xen? hypervisor, may I | say that the changed product is the Xen hypervisor? | | No. If you have changed an

I found an old ROM BIOS chip in my drawer with label Centos(r) Copyright 1994 on it. Then I found http://www.centos.com.tw/ on the net. Has anyone checked if you can use the name centos without any fear of litigation? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070101/3918e0cc/attachment-0001.html>

Just thought I'd put my two cents in about the trademark infringement issue. I ran the true SSH for about a month some time back. When I learned of OpenSSH, I dropped the official product and built OpenSSH. Quite frankly, OpenSSH is a superior package. It is cleaner, commercially unencumbered, and with its affiliation to the OpenBSD team, I feel more secure about the code quality. When