similar to: Basic question from newbie...

Dear all, I'm currently applying a mixed model approach to meta analysis using the package metafor. I use the "model.matrix()" function to create dummy variables. The option btt gives me the combined test for the dummies. Problem is, I don't know which indices I have to use, and can't really figure it out from the help file and the examples. I use following code : X <-

Hi Jens, this series removes the revalidate_disk() function, which has been a really odd duck in the last years. The prime reason why most people use it is because it propagates a size change from the gendisk to the block_device structure. But it also calls into the rather ill defined ->revalidate_disk method which is rather useless for the callers. So this adds a new helper to just

Hello, Reid. > Fortunately, with SVN, making such a change isn't hard and its tracked > in the commits. Anyone object or have other ideas in this realm? I'm also confused. At one hand, proposed layout (with BTT in the top) seems to be "unnatural", when we will create new tags/branches. In theory, each module can have its own version, thus if the want to "tag"

Hi, I am quite new to R and in need of some advice. I am trying to conduct a meta regression over a some studies with about 7 mod variables which I have to dummy encode. I have found the following piece of code in the manual for the metafor library: ### manual dummy coding of the allocation factor alloc.random <- ifelse(dat$alloc == "random", 1, 0) alloc.alternate <-

Hello all. I'm new(ish) to the world of linux and am about to finally make the plunge and ditch windows completely. However, there's only one program that I want from windows that I use regularly and that is napster for it's music subscription service. It really is a brilliant service as the choice and variety can't really be matched. Now, I don't know if this is the right area

This is an attempt to fix the issue that some disks' sysfs attributes are not ready at the time its KOBJ_ADD event is sent. The symptom is during device hotplug, udev may fail to find certain attributes, such as serial or wwn, of the disk. As a result the /dev/disk/by-id entries are not created. The cause is device_add_disk emits the uevent before returning, and the callers have to create

This is an attempt to fix the issue that some disks' sysfs attributes are not ready at the time its KOBJ_ADD event is sent. The symptom is during device hotplug, udev may fail to find certain attributes, such as serial or wwn, of the disk. As a result the /dev/disk/by-id entries are not created. The cause is device_add_disk emits the uevent before returning, and the callers have to create

The race condition is noticed between disk_add() and disk attributes, on virtio-blk hotplug. Userspace listens to the KOBJ_ADD uevent generated in add_disk(). At that point we haven't created the serial attribute file, therefore depending on how fast udev reacts, the /dev/disk/by-id/ entry doesn't always get created. As pointed out by Christoph Hellwig in the specific fix [1], virtio-blk

The race condition is noticed between disk_add() and disk attributes, on virtio-blk hotplug. Userspace listens to the KOBJ_ADD uevent generated in add_disk(). At that point we haven't created the serial attribute file, therefore depending on how fast udev reacts, the /dev/disk/by-id/ entry doesn't always get created. As pointed out by Christoph Hellwig in the specific fix [1], virtio-blk

----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 12:02:11 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Opensolaris-ish joins but does not seem to be valid > On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:28:09 -0500 (CDT) > Andrew Martin <amartin at xes-inc.com> wrote: > >

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > Ok, I think I have a working pass that is based much more on what we've > talked about here. The patch is attached. I'd love to commit it soon-ish and > then start tweaking it based on feedback from you, others, and looking at > how it actually works in the wild. After chatting briefly

Whenever I was tying to do that (in version 2.8), it didn't give them to me in a topological order. What I did, as a hack-ish temporary measure, was rely on Function's ordering, and just iterated over all the blocks in the function, checking to see if the loop contains that block. Not at all ideal, and what I was writing later evolved to not need the topological ordering constraint, so I

Thanks Michael. Can you please explain you way a bit more? Did you run a function pass then a loop pass? On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Michael Ilseman <michael at lunarg.com> wrote: > Whenever I was tying to do that (in version 2.8), it didn't give them > to me in a topological order. What I did, as a hack-ish temporary > measure, was rely on Function's ordering, and

Dear R-experts! In a meta-analysis (metafor) I would like to assess the effect of two categorical covariates (A & B) whereas they both have 4 levels. Is my understanding correct that this would require to dummy-code (0,1) each level of each covariate (A & B)? However I am interested in the main-effects and the interaction of these two covariates and the dummy-coding would only allow to

I've got exim set up to deliver like this: command = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -a $original_local_part@$original_domain -d $local_part@$domain -f $sender_address If an email to is bob+sales at ish.com.au then we should have "-a bob+sales at subdomain.ish.com.au -d bob at ish.com.au". Now in dovecot, only bob at ish.com.au is a real user but I want to be able to

Hello All, Been completely obsessed for the last two days with VoIP and Asterisk - running on 2 hours sleep and coffee - sorry if this is a little scattered... Okay, I've got a small start-up company that installs traditional PBX (Nortel mainly) systems, data network infrastructure, commercial audio/video, residential audio/video/voice/data and we do lighting control systems... I've

Hi, I was wondering if anyone could give me advice regarding using the lmer command in lme4 package to do logistic regression (mixed effects model). I use the following command lmer(ISH ~ArrayPathology2, random=~1|PatientID, data=HSDB4.noNA, family="binomial") where ISH is outcome(0 or 1), ArrayPathology2 is the variable of interest(factor), PatientID is random effect(factor), and

I've just found out what it's doing, so I thought I'd include the useful symptom. Joe ----- Forwarded message from Joe Dauncey <joe at dauncey.net> ----- From: Joe Dauncey <joe at dauncey.net> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Newbie-ish Questions To: dovecot at dovecot.org Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 08:18:04 +0100 Organization: dauncey.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Mailer:

Ok, I think I have a working pass that is based much more on what we've talked about here. The patch is attached. I'd love to commit it soon-ish and then start tweaking it based on feedback from you, others, and looking at how it actually works in the wild. It's essentially a re-write, so it may be hard to read... Let me know if some other form would be easier. Some responses to your

On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:39:43 -0500 (CDT) Andrew Martin <amartin at xes-inc.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > > To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 2:23:02 AM > > Subject: Re: [Samba] Opensolaris-ish joins but does not seem to be > >