Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[RFC, PATCH 20/24] i386 Vmi module fixups"
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 6/24] i386 Vmi magic fixes
Linker changes to add the VMI MACH_TEXT area into the kernel text
section. This area layout is heavily influenced by magic to overlap
exactly with the 32-byte VMI ROM entry points, allowing the kernel
to copy the VMI ROM over the native section. As use of magic is
on the decline, this approach is being phased out in favor of the
more modern approach of the inline implementation. The translation
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 6/24] i386 Vmi magic fixes
Linker changes to add the VMI MACH_TEXT area into the kernel text
section. This area layout is heavily influenced by magic to overlap
exactly with the 32-byte VMI ROM entry points, allowing the kernel
to copy the VMI ROM over the native section. As use of magic is
on the decline, this approach is being phased out in favor of the
more modern approach of the inline implementation. The translation
2010 Aug 23
1
Removing VMI kernel support from 2.6.37
Hi Peter,
Removal of VMI(VMware's para-virtualization technique) is scheduled for
2.6.37, I was wondering what would be the right time frame for
submitting a patch which does that. Does the x86-tip tree have any next
branch where we can park this patch ?
Below is the patch for your reference which just removes VMI specific
bits, applies on top of x86-tip.
There is also an opportunity to
2010 Aug 23
1
Removing VMI kernel support from 2.6.37
Hi Peter,
Removal of VMI(VMware's para-virtualization technique) is scheduled for
2.6.37, I was wondering what would be the right time frame for
submitting a patch which does that. Does the x86-tip tree have any next
branch where we can park this patch ?
Below is the patch for your reference which just removes VMI specific
bits, applies on top of x86-tip.
There is also an opportunity to
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] 2.6.21 - VMI logic error
So there is a logic error that would prevent us from ever using NOP =
relocations, thus stopping any unnecessary callouts into a VMI ROM. It =
doesn't affect us so much, but could conceivably affect open source =
implementations of a VMI ROM in the future. It is not absolutely =
critical, but it would be extremely nice to get it fixed in 2.6.21 so =
there are no broken older kernels
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] 2.6.21 - VMI logic error
So there is a logic error that would prevent us from ever using NOP =
relocations, thus stopping any unnecessary callouts into a VMI ROM. It =
doesn't affect us so much, but could conceivably affect open source =
implementations of a VMI ROM in the future. It is not absolutely =
critical, but it would be extremely nice to get it fixed in 2.6.21 so =
there are no broken older kernels
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 21/24] i386 Vmi proc node
Add a /proc node for the VMI sub-arch, which gives information on the VMI ROM
detected using /proc/vmi/info and a list of kernel annotations in
/proc/vmi/annotations.
The timing information is VMware specific, and should probably be put into a
separate /proc node (and a separate patch for our internal use).
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Index:
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 21/24] i386 Vmi proc node
Add a /proc node for the VMI sub-arch, which gives information on the VMI ROM
detected using /proc/vmi/info and a list of kernel annotations in
/proc/vmi/annotations.
The timing information is VMware specific, and should probably be put into a
separate /proc node (and a separate patch for our internal use).
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Index:
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 3/3] Vmi native fix
In paravirt builds with VMI compiled in, vmi_bringup is called
unconditionally, not via a paravirt-ops table (as no other hypervisor
uses the APIC startup technique). Make the calls to setup VMI state
conditional on the presence of the VMI ROM.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
diff -r 1915e2685a3c arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Thu Jan 04 15:56:40 2007
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 3/3] Vmi native fix
In paravirt builds with VMI compiled in, vmi_bringup is called
unconditionally, not via a paravirt-ops table (as no other hypervisor
uses the APIC startup technique). Make the calls to setup VMI state
conditional on the presence of the VMI ROM.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
diff -r 1915e2685a3c arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Thu Jan 04 15:56:40 2007
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 15/24] i386 Vmi apic header
Move APIC read / write accessors to sub-arch layer. Note that we
don't bother to implement apic_write_atomic any different, as it
is only present to work around old processor erratums (Pentium
Processor Spec update 11AP), and VMI kernels do not offer support
for this class of processor.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Arai <arai@vmware.com>
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 15/24] i386 Vmi apic header
Move APIC read / write accessors to sub-arch layer. Note that we
don't bother to implement apic_write_atomic any different, as it
is only present to work around old processor erratums (Pentium
Processor Spec update 11AP), and VMI kernels do not offer support
for this class of processor.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Arai <arai@vmware.com>
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 8/9] Vmi apic ops.diff
Use para_fill instead of directly setting the APIC ops to the result of the
vmi_get_function call - this allows one to implement a VMI ROM without
implementing APIC functions, just using the native APIC functions.
While doing this, I realized that there is a lot more cleanup that should
have been done. Basically, we should never assume that the ROM implements
a specific set of functions, and
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 8/9] Vmi apic ops.diff
Use para_fill instead of directly setting the APIC ops to the result of the
vmi_get_function call - this allows one to implement a VMI ROM without
implementing APIC functions, just using the native APIC functions.
While doing this, I realized that there is a lot more cleanup that should
have been done. Basically, we should never assume that the ROM implements
a specific set of functions, and
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 8/10] Vmi kmap_atomic_pte fix.patch
Implement vmi_kmap_atomic_pte in terms of the backend set_linear_mapping
operation. The conversion is rather straighforward; call kmap_atomic
and then inform the hypervisor of the page mapping.
The _flush_tlb damage is due to macros being pulled in from highmem.h.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
diff -r 2207a31829e7 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Mon
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 8/10] Vmi kmap_atomic_pte fix.patch
Implement vmi_kmap_atomic_pte in terms of the backend set_linear_mapping
operation. The conversion is rather straighforward; call kmap_atomic
and then inform the hypervisor of the page mapping.
The _flush_tlb damage is due to macros being pulled in from highmem.h.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
diff -r 2207a31829e7 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Mon
2009 Sep 18
3
Paravirtualization on VMware's Platform [VMI].
Hi,
We ran a few experiments to compare performance of VMware's
paravirtualization technique (VMI) and hardware MMU technologies (HWMMU)
on VMware's hypervisor.
To give some background, VMI is VMware's paravirtualization
specification which tries to optimize CPU and MMU operations of the
guest operating system. For more information take a look at this
2009 Sep 18
3
Paravirtualization on VMware's Platform [VMI].
Hi,
We ran a few experiments to compare performance of VMware's
paravirtualization technique (VMI) and hardware MMU technologies (HWMMU)
on VMware's hypervisor.
To give some background, VMI is VMware's paravirtualization
specification which tries to optimize CPU and MMU operations of the
guest operating system. For more information take a look at this
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 6/10] Vmi supports compat vdso.patch
Now that the VDSO can be relocated, we can support it in VMI configurations.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
diff -r 158d9ffb46fe arch/i386/Kconfig
--- a/arch/i386/Kconfig Thu Mar 29 04:17:05 2007 -0700
+++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig Thu Mar 29 04:18:05 2007 -0700
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ config PARAVIRT
config VMI
bool "VMI Paravirt-ops support"
- depends on PARAVIRT
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 1/3] Vmi compile fix
The variable no_timer_check does not exist in UP builds; don't try to
set it in the vmi init code.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
diff -r 21d7686ee318 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Thu Jan 04 15:23:30 2007 -0800
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Thu Jan 04 15:55:39 2007 -0800
@@ -913,7 +913,9 @@ void __init vmi_init(void)
local_irq_save(flags);