similar to: [RFC, PATCH 7/24] i386 Vmi memory hole

Allow compile time creation of a hole at the high end of linear address space. This makes accomodating a hypervisor a much more tractable problem by giving it ample playground to live in. Currently, the hole size is fixed at config time; I have experimented with dynamically sized holes, and have a later patch that developes this potential, but it becomes much more useful once the exact

Allow compile time creation of a hole at the high end of linear address space. This makes accomodating a hypervisor a much more tractable problem by giving it ample playground to live in. Currently, the hole size is fixed at config time; I have experimented with dynamically sized holes, and have a later patch that developes this potential, but it becomes much more useful once the exact

Introduce the basic VMI sub-arch configuration dependencies. VMI kernels only are designed to run on modern hardware platforms. As such, they require a working APIC, and do not support some legacy functionality, including APM BIOS, ISA and MCA bus systems, PCI BIOS interfaces, or PnP BIOS (by implication of dropping ISA support). They also require a P6 series CPU. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden

Introduce the basic VMI sub-arch configuration dependencies. VMI kernels only are designed to run on modern hardware platforms. As such, they require a working APIC, and do not support some legacy functionality, including APM BIOS, ISA and MCA bus systems, PCI BIOS interfaces, or PnP BIOS (by implication of dropping ISA support). They also require a P6 series CPU. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden

This most curious patch allows the fixmap on i386 to be unfixed. The = result is that we can create a dynamically sizable hole at the top of = kernel linear address space. I know at least some virtualization = developers are interested in being able to achieve this to achieve = run-time sizing of a hole in which a hypervisor can live, or at least to = test out the performance

This most curious patch allows the fixmap on i386 to be unfixed. The = result is that we can create a dynamically sizable hole at the top of = kernel linear address space. I know at least some virtualization = developers are interested in being able to achieve this to achieve = run-time sizing of a hole in which a hypervisor can live, or at least to = test out the performance

AFAICT we'll pay one extra TLB entry for this patch. Zach had a patch which left the vsyscall page at the top of memory (minus hole for hypervisor) and patched the ELF header at boot. Thoughts welcome, Rusty. Name: Move vsyscall page out of fixmap, above stack Author: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de> Hypervisors want to use memory at the top of the address space (eg. 64MB for Xen, or

AFAICT we'll pay one extra TLB entry for this patch. Zach had a patch which left the vsyscall page at the top of memory (minus hole for hypervisor) and patched the ELF header at boot. Thoughts welcome, Rusty. Name: Move vsyscall page out of fixmap, above stack Author: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de> Hypervisors want to use memory at the top of the address space (eg. 64MB for Xen, or

So, is everyone happy with this smerge of Ingo and Gerd's work? Reposted below. Thanks, Rusty. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: FW: argh]] Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:35:51 -0700 (PDT) On Thu, 18 May 2006, Rusty Russell wrote: >

So, is everyone happy with this smerge of Ingo and Gerd's work? Reposted below. Thanks, Rusty. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: FW: argh]] Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:35:51 -0700 (PDT) On Thu, 18 May 2006, Rusty Russell wrote: >

Paravirt-ops guests which move the fixmap also end up moving the syscall = VDSO. This fails if it is prelinked at a fixed address, which is why = COMPAT_VDSO is broken under CONFIG_VMI (and also under CONFIG_XEN). = Several options are available to try to address this. Jan had cooked up = a patch for Xen that used build magic to find the parts of the VDSO that = need relocation. I

Paravirt-ops guests which move the fixmap also end up moving the syscall = VDSO. This fails if it is prelinked at a fixed address, which is why = COMPAT_VDSO is broken under CONFIG_VMI (and also under CONFIG_XEN). = Several options are available to try to address this. Jan had cooked up = a patch for Xen that used build magic to find the parts of the VDSO that = need relocation. I

Implement vmi_kmap_atomic_pte in terms of the backend set_linear_mapping operation. The conversion is rather straighforward; call kmap_atomic and then inform the hypervisor of the page mapping. The _flush_tlb damage is due to macros being pulled in from highmem.h. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r 2207a31829e7 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Mon

Implement vmi_kmap_atomic_pte in terms of the backend set_linear_mapping operation. The conversion is rather straighforward; call kmap_atomic and then inform the hypervisor of the page mapping. The _flush_tlb damage is due to macros being pulled in from highmem.h. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r 2207a31829e7 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Mon

On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 13:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Subject: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > > commit 3bbf54725467d604698721384d858b5983b87e8f disables the VDSO for > CONFIG_PARAVIRT kernels. This #ifdeffery was a bad change: the VDSO is > an essential component of Linux, and this change forces all of them to > use

On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 13:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Subject: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > > commit 3bbf54725467d604698721384d858b5983b87e8f disables the VDSO for > CONFIG_PARAVIRT kernels. This #ifdeffery was a bad change: the VDSO is > an essential component of Linux, and this change forces all of them to > use

Macros to use VMI calls from assembly and C languages are introduced. The macros are quite complex, but the end result is rather impressive. The result is that when compiling a VMI kernel, the native code is emitted inline, with no function call overhead, and some wiggle room for register allocation. The hypervisor compatibility code is emitted out of line into a separate section, and patched

Macros to use VMI calls from assembly and C languages are introduced. The macros are quite complex, but the end result is rather impressive. The result is that when compiling a VMI kernel, the native code is emitted inline, with no function call overhead, and some wiggle room for register allocation. The hypervisor compatibility code is emitted out of line into a separate section, and patched

Hi Peter, Removal of VMI(VMware's para-virtualization technique) is scheduled for 2.6.37, I was wondering what would be the right time frame for submitting a patch which does that. Does the x86-tip tree have any next branch where we can park this patch ? Below is the patch for your reference which just removes VMI specific bits, applies on top of x86-tip. There is also an opportunity to

Hi Peter, Removal of VMI(VMware's para-virtualization technique) is scheduled for 2.6.37, I was wondering what would be the right time frame for submitting a patch which does that. Does the x86-tip tree have any next branch where we can park this patch ? Below is the patch for your reference which just removes VMI specific bits, applies on top of x86-tip. There is also an opportunity to