Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "A proposal - binary"
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH/RFC] replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock paravirt_op
Subject: Add a sched_clock paravirt_op
The tsc-based get_scheduled_cycles interface is not a good match for
Xen's runstate accounting, which reports everything in nanoseconds.
This patch replaces this interface with a sched_clock interface, which
matches both Xen and VMI's requirements.
In order to do this, we:
1. replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock
2. hoist cycles_2_ns
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH/RFC] replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock paravirt_op
Subject: Add a sched_clock paravirt_op
The tsc-based get_scheduled_cycles interface is not a good match for
Xen's runstate accounting, which reports everything in nanoseconds.
This patch replaces this interface with a sched_clock interface, which
matches both Xen and VMI's requirements.
In order to do this, we:
1. replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock
2. hoist cycles_2_ns
2007 May 06
2
paravirt_ops queue rebased
I just rebased my paravirt_ops patch queue to current git. Looks like
almost all the pre-req patches are now in, which is nice.
The only missing thing from your patches was you sched_clock patches and
the sched_clock paravirt-op. Are there still problems with either your
sched_clock patch or the paravirt patch? Should I resubmit the
paravirt-sched_clock patch based on git?
The only other
2007 May 06
2
paravirt_ops queue rebased
I just rebased my paravirt_ops patch queue to current git. Looks like
almost all the pre-req patches are now in, which is nice.
The only missing thing from your patches was you sched_clock patches and
the sched_clock paravirt-op. Are there still problems with either your
sched_clock patch or the paravirt patch? Should I resubmit the
paravirt-sched_clock patch based on git?
The only other
2008 Jan 21
7
[PATCH 0/4] paravirt_ops-64 compile fixes
This series contain fixes to make the paravirt_ops code compile and boot
on x86_64.
This is a follow-up for the previous series from Glauber.
2008 Jan 21
7
[PATCH 0/4] paravirt_ops-64 compile fixes
This series contain fixes to make the paravirt_ops code compile and boot
on x86_64.
This is a follow-up for the previous series from Glauber.
2007 Apr 18
23
[patch 00/20] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi,
Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day.
Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering,
cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery.
Overview:
add-MAINTAINERS.patch
obvious
remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch
No longer meaningful or needed.
paravirt-nop.patch
Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to
2007 Apr 18
23
[patch 00/20] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi,
Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day.
Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering,
cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery.
Overview:
add-MAINTAINERS.patch
obvious
remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch
No longer meaningful or needed.
paravirt-nop.patch
Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to
2007 Apr 18
17
[patch 00/17] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi,
This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the
changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces
necessary for Xen.
The brief overview:
add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious
remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed
paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently
paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack
2007 Apr 18
17
[patch 00/17] paravirt_ops updates
Hi Andi,
This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the
changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces
necessary for Xen.
The brief overview:
add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious
remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed
paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently
paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 4/9] Vmi fix highpte
Provide a PT map hook for HIGHPTE kernels to designate where they are mapping
page tables. This information is required so the physical address of PTE
updates can be determined; otherwise, the mm layer would have to carry the
physical address all the way to each PTE modification callsite, which is
even more hideous that the macros required to provide the proper hooks.
So lets not mess up arch
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 4/9] Vmi fix highpte
Provide a PT map hook for HIGHPTE kernels to designate where they are mapping
page tables. This information is required so the physical address of PTE
updates can be determined; otherwise, the mm layer would have to carry the
physical address all the way to each PTE modification callsite, which is
even more hideous that the macros required to provide the proper hooks.
So lets not mess up arch
2007 Apr 18
2
APIC clock setup dependent on PAE ?
Why are these APIC clock init hooks dependent on CONFIG_X86_PAE ?
include/asm/paravirt.h:
static inline void setup_boot_clock(void)
{
paravirt_ops.setup_boot_clock();
}
static inline void setup_secondary_clock(void)
{
paravirt_ops.setup_secondary_clock();
}
(via the vmi timer patch).
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
2007 Apr 18
2
APIC clock setup dependent on PAE ?
Why are these APIC clock init hooks dependent on CONFIG_X86_PAE ?
include/asm/paravirt.h:
static inline void setup_boot_clock(void)
{
paravirt_ops.setup_boot_clock();
}
static inline void setup_secondary_clock(void)
{
paravirt_ops.setup_secondary_clock();
}
(via the vmi timer patch).
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
2007 Apr 18
31
[PATCH 00/28] Updates for firstfloor paravirt-ops patches
Hi Andi,
This is a set of updates for the firstfloor patch queue.
Quick rundown:
revert-mm-x86_64-mm-account-for-module-percpu-space-separately-from-kernel-percpu.patch
separate-module-percpu-space.patch
Update the module percpu accounting patch
fix-ff-allow-percpu-variables-to-be-page-aligned.patch
Make sure the percpu memory allocation is page-aligned
2007 Apr 18
31
[PATCH 00/28] Updates for firstfloor paravirt-ops patches
Hi Andi,
This is a set of updates for the firstfloor patch queue.
Quick rundown:
revert-mm-x86_64-mm-account-for-module-percpu-space-separately-from-kernel-percpu.patch
separate-module-percpu-space.patch
Update the module percpu accounting patch
fix-ff-allow-percpu-variables-to-be-page-aligned.patch
Make sure the percpu memory allocation is page-aligned
2007 Apr 18
1
warnings in rc4-mm2
i386 allmodconfig
arch/i386/power/cpu.c: In function '__save_processor_state':
arch/i386/power/cpu.c:29: warning: passing argument 1 of 'paravirt_ops.store_gdt' from incompatible pointer type
arch/i386/power/cpu.c:30: warning: passing argument 1 of 'paravirt_ops.store_idt' from incompatible pointer type
arch/i386/power/cpu.c: In function
2007 Apr 18
1
warnings in rc4-mm2
i386 allmodconfig
arch/i386/power/cpu.c: In function '__save_processor_state':
arch/i386/power/cpu.c:29: warning: passing argument 1 of 'paravirt_ops.store_gdt' from incompatible pointer type
arch/i386/power/cpu.c:30: warning: passing argument 1 of 'paravirt_ops.store_idt' from incompatible pointer type
arch/i386/power/cpu.c: In function
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 1/2] paravirt.h header
OK, this is the revised paravirt.h (Andi has seen this before), then the
second is the binary patching stuff. More things get added to the
paravirt struct in future patches, but this basic stuff hasn't changed
for some time.
====
This patch does the dumbest possible replacement of paravirtualized
instructions: calls through a "paravirt_ops" structure. Currently
these are function
2007 Apr 28
3
huh startup_ipi_hook?
The current paravirt startup_ipi hook for vmware
commit: ae5da273fe3352febd38658d8d34484cbcfb3423
is quite frankly ridiculous.
In the middle of wake_up_secondary_cpu:
We have:
/*
* Paravirt / VMI wants a startup IPI hook here to set up the
* target processor state.
*/
startup_ipi_hook(phys_apicid, (unsigned long) start_secondary,
(unsigned