similar to: [patch 0/8] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel

[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ] Hi Andrew, This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree. For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The patches should

[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ] Hi Andrew, This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree. For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The patches should

In-Reply-To: <20060803002518.190834642@xensource.com> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:25:13 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > We allow for the fact that the guest kernel may not run in ring 0. > This requires some abstraction in a few places when setting %cs or > checking privilege level (user vs kernel). I made some changes: a. Added some comments about the SEGMENT_IS_*_CODE() macros.

In-Reply-To: <20060803002518.190834642@xensource.com> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:25:13 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > We allow for the fact that the guest kernel may not run in ring 0. > This requires some abstraction in a few places when setting %cs or > checking privilege level (user vs kernel). I made some changes: a. Added some comments about the SEGMENT_IS_*_CODE() macros.

Hi all, I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're getting somewhere. These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0, and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The third patch is

Hi all, I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're getting somewhere. These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0, and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The third patch is

OK, this is the revised paravirt.h (Andi has seen this before), then the second is the binary patching stuff. More things get added to the paravirt struct in future patches, but this basic stuff hasn't changed for some time. ==== This patch does the dumbest possible replacement of paravirtualized instructions: calls through a "paravirt_ops" structure. Currently these are function

The following patches introduce the core infrastructure needed to paravirtualize the 32-bit x86 Linux kernel. This is done by moving virtualization sensitive insn's or code paths to a function table, paravirt_ops. This structure can be populated with hypervisor specific calls or native stubs and currently support running on bare metal, VMI, Xen, or Lhype. These patches apply to

The following patches introduce the core infrastructure needed to paravirtualize the 32-bit x86 Linux kernel. This is done by moving virtualization sensitive insn's or code paths to a function table, paravirt_ops. This structure can be populated with hypervisor specific calls or native stubs and currently support running on bare metal, VMI, Xen, or Lhype. These patches apply to

Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths

Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths

Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths

This version over last version: (1) Gets rid of the no_paravirt.h header and leaves native ops in place (with some reshuffling to keep then under one #ifdef). (2) Fixes the "X crashes with CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y" bug. (3) Puts __ex_table entry in paravirt iret. Another followup patch implements binary patching... Rusty. === Create a paravirt.h header for all the critical operations which

This version over last version: (1) Gets rid of the no_paravirt.h header and leaves native ops in place (with some reshuffling to keep then under one #ifdef). (2) Fixes the "X crashes with CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y" bug. (3) Puts __ex_table entry in paravirt iret. Another followup patch implements binary patching... Rusty. === Create a paravirt.h header for all the critical operations which

(Andrew, please sit these in the -mm tree for cooking) Create a paravirt.h header for (almost) all the critical operations which need to be replaced with hypervisor calls. For the moment, this simply includes no_paravirt.h, where all the native implementations now live. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>

(Andrew, please sit these in the -mm tree for cooking) Create a paravirt.h header for (almost) all the critical operations which need to be replaced with hypervisor calls. For the moment, this simply includes no_paravirt.h, where all the native implementations now live. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>

Hi folks, Here is the result of the latest work on the pvops front, after the x86 arch merge. From the functionality point of view, almost nothing was changed, except for proper vsmp support - which was discussed, but not implemented before - and the introduction of smp_ops in x86_64, which eased the merging of the smp header. Speaking of the merge, a significant part (although not majority) of

Hi folks, Here is the result of the latest work on the pvops front, after the x86 arch merge. From the functionality point of view, almost nothing was changed, except for proper vsmp support - which was discussed, but not implemented before - and the introduction of smp_ops in x86_64, which eased the merging of the smp header. Speaking of the merge, a significant part (although not majority) of

Clean up of patch for letting kernel run other than ring 0: a. Add some comments about the SEGMENT_IS_*_CODE() macros. b. Add a USER_RPL macro. (Code was comparing a value to a mask in some places and to the magic number 3 in other places.) c. Add macros for table indicator field and use them. d. Change the entry.S tests for LDT stack segment to use the macros. Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert

Clean up of patch for letting kernel run other than ring 0: a. Add some comments about the SEGMENT_IS_*_CODE() macros. b. Add a USER_RPL macro. (Code was comparing a value to a mask in some places and to the magic number 3 in other places.) c. Add macros for table indicator field and use them. d. Change the entry.S tests for LDT stack segment to use the macros. Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert