similar to: [PATCH 1/4] Prep for paravirt: move pagetable includes.

Move header includes for the nopud / nopmd types to the location of the actual pte / pgd type definitions. This allows generic 4-level page type code to be written before the split 2/3 level page table headers are included. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r 8233e2c507d3 include/asm-i386/page.h --- a/include/asm-i386/page.h Thu Oct 19 03:11:37 2006 -0700 +++

Move header includes for the nopud / nopmd types to the location of the actual pte / pgd type definitions. This allows generic 4-level page type code to be written before the split 2/3 level page table headers are included. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r 8233e2c507d3 include/asm-i386/page.h --- a/include/asm-i386/page.h Thu Oct 19 03:11:37 2006 -0700 +++

I'm seeing oopses in probe_roms() and pci_find_bios(), apparently because those pages are not mapped under Xen. I'm not sure why I'm seeing this now and not before, but I suspect its because I enabled CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC. Anyway, I've got these patches to deal with these cases: --- a/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c @@ -276,7 +276,14 @@ static

I'm seeing oopses in probe_roms() and pci_find_bios(), apparently because those pages are not mapped under Xen. I'm not sure why I'm seeing this now and not before, but I suspect its because I enabled CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC. Anyway, I've got these patches to deal with these cases: --- a/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c @@ -276,7 +276,14 @@ static

* Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> wrote: > On 2009-01-23 20:27, Török Edwin wrote: > >>> > >>> > >> i'd not mind it at all if the kernel could be built with other open-source > >> compilers too. > >> > >> Now in this case the patch you suggest might end up hurting the end result > >> so it's

On 2009-01-23 20:27, Török Edwin wrote: >>> >>> >> i'd not mind it at all if the kernel could be built with other open-source >> compilers too. >> >> Now in this case the patch you suggest might end up hurting the end result >> so it's not an unconditional 'yes'. But ... how much it actually matters >> depends on

Master definition of VMI interface, including calls, constants, and interface version. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-vmi/paravirtualInterface.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.16-rc5.orig/include/asm-i386/mach-vmi/paravirtualInterface.h 2006-03-08 10:08:45.000000000 -0800 +++

Master definition of VMI interface, including calls, constants, and interface version. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Index: linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-vmi/paravirtualInterface.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.16-rc5.orig/include/asm-i386/mach-vmi/paravirtualInterface.h 2006-03-08 10:08:45.000000000 -0800 +++

On 2009-01-23 20:30, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Having said that, llvm-gcc is not yet able to compile the full Linux >> kernel on its own [for example the boot code, due to asm(".code16gcc")], >> but with LLVM 2.4 it was possible to build "arch=UM", and "arch=X86" (by >> using

MMU code movement. Unfortunately, this one is a little bit more complicated than the rest. We have to override the default accessors that directly write to page table entries. Because of the 2/3-level PAE split in Linux, this turned out to be really ugly at first, but by allowing the sub-arch layer to override the definitions and keeping the native definitions in place, the code becomes much

MMU code movement. Unfortunately, this one is a little bit more complicated than the rest. We have to override the default accessors that directly write to page table entries. Because of the 2/3-level PAE split in Linux, this turned out to be really ugly at first, but by allowing the sub-arch layer to override the definitions and keeping the native definitions in place, the code becomes much

tree: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next head: 39c226b6b576b23d6d558331e6895f02b0892555 commit: 990055c63121520ad29deca72b1167b392563ddd [16/17] virtio-balloon: Add support for providing unused page reports to host config: riscv-allmodconfig (attached as .config) compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0 reproduce: wget

tree: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next head: c5db5a8d998da36ada7287aa53b4ed501a0a2b2b commit: b1b0d638e6f93b91cf34585350bb00035d066989 [13/15] mm: Introduce Reported pages config: ia64-defconfig (attached as .config) compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0 reproduce: wget

clear MPT l2 entries when allocating monitor pagetable Changeset 10734 removed the code clearing MPT l2 entries, however these entries are stained when copying from idle_pg_table_l2. Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On 2009-01-24 19:27, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> wrote: > >> #define put_user(x, ptr) \ >> ({ \ >> - int __ret_pu; \ >> + __typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret_pu; \ >> > > This does not look right. We can sometimes have

Hi all, in which file is the %prep script defined? www.rpm.org says its a build-in script. Does that mean its defined in some binary? I wonder how %prep handles the setup of locale. TIA .....Volker

Hey All, I downloaded winebottler so that I can run the GMAT Prep software and was successful in downloading it but i am now running into a few problems. For examples, if there is a "next" icon on the window, I will need to click on it and hit the space bar simultaneously to move on to the next page. I was able to do this on the writing assessment section of the practice test but on the

On several occasions lately I've had to force installation of updates. The update-manager app; has been flagging some of them with an invalid permission code or some such. Perhaps the algorithm for this has changed with 11.04? To force installation just run with: sudo apt-get upgrade You will be asked if you want to proceed, answer y You will then be asked if you want to accept unverified

I want to install Dahdi and Dahdi-tools on a CentOS 5.3 Xen host and I receive the following error : "You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.6.20-prep kernel installed." I have installed : - kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.x86_64 - kernel-devel-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.x86_64 - kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.x86_64 bash-3.2# uname -r 2.6.20-prep bash-3.2# ls -l

On 2020/10/22 ??8:34, Mike Christie wrote: > This is just a prep patch to get vhost_dev_init callers ready to handle > the next patch where the function can fail. In this patch vhost_dev_init > just returns 0, but I think it's easier to check for goto/error handling > errors separated from the next patch. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Christie<michael.christie at oracle.com>