Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[patch] asm/i386/kernel/paravirt.c buildfix"
2007 May 15
3
[PATCH 1/12] Add suspend/resume to devices owned by Xen
Add suspend/resume to devices owned by Xen.
Signed-off-by Ke Yu <ke.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
diff -r 3ef0510e44d0 xen/arch/x86/apic.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c Tue May 08 10:21:23 2007 +0100
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c Mon May 14 15:05:28 2007 -0400
@@ -579,6 +579,95 @@ void __devinit setup_local_APIC(void)
apic_pm_activate();
}
+static
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 15/24] i386 Vmi apic header
Move APIC read / write accessors to sub-arch layer. Note that we
don't bother to implement apic_write_atomic any different, as it
is only present to work around old processor erratums (Pentium
Processor Spec update 11AP), and VMI kernels do not offer support
for this class of processor.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Arai <arai@vmware.com>
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 15/24] i386 Vmi apic header
Move APIC read / write accessors to sub-arch layer. Note that we
don't bother to implement apic_write_atomic any different, as it
is only present to work around old processor erratums (Pentium
Processor Spec update 11AP), and VMI kernels do not offer support
for this class of processor.
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Arai <arai@vmware.com>
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 04/17] pavarvirt_ops - apci header updates
plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-apic-header.patch)
This patch updates the apic header file for switching
apic_read and write for use with paravirt ops.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Index: clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/apic.h
===================================================================
---
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 04/17] pavarvirt_ops - apci header updates
plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-apic-header.patch)
This patch updates the apic header file for switching
apic_read and write for use with paravirt ops.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Index: clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/apic.h
===================================================================
---
2008 Apr 14
0
xf86-video-radeonhd 1.2.1 'Buildfix Release'
Announcing the 'Buildfix Release' of the xf86-video-radeonhd driver.
RadeonHD is the X.org X11 driver for AMD GPG (ATI) r5xx/r6xx chipsets.
The development is driven by Novell at the time of writing, together
with a community of open source developers around this driver.
AMD provides free documentation for the chipsets.
Note the wiki on http://wiki.x.org/wiki/radeonhd
Version 1.2.1
2008 Jul 15
4
Patch from LKML
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Suresh Siddha
> <suresh.b.siddha at intel.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:19:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> fix for pv.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel at gmail.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 5 ----
> >>
2008 Jul 15
4
Patch from LKML
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Suresh Siddha
> <suresh.b.siddha at intel.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:19:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> fix for pv.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel at gmail.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 5 ----
> >>
2007 Jul 09
1
[PATCH RFC] first cut at splitting up paravirt_ops
Here's a first attempt at splitting up paravirt_ops into more specific
chunks. Its pretty clunky and chunky; mostly just a lot of
replacement. The grouping of ops is very first cut; I'm open to
suggestions about what groups should exist and what ops they each should
contain.
The only slightly subtle part is that I've kept the structures wrapped
in a paravirt_ops structure,
2007 Jul 09
1
[PATCH RFC] first cut at splitting up paravirt_ops
Here's a first attempt at splitting up paravirt_ops into more specific
chunks. Its pretty clunky and chunky; mostly just a lot of
replacement. The grouping of ops is very first cut; I'm open to
suggestions about what groups should exist and what ops they each should
contain.
The only slightly subtle part is that I've kept the structures wrapped
in a paravirt_ops structure,
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] x86_64 paravirt_ops port
Hi all,
I've been working on a port of paravirt_ops for the x86_64 architectures
for a couple of days. Here's the result so far. I'm posting it soon for
early cooments. The more, the better.
It's obviously based on the previous work for i386, with the needed
modifications. By now, I'm able to boot a bare metal kernel, but there
are still some known issues, that are in my TODO
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] x86_64 paravirt_ops port
Hi all,
I've been working on a port of paravirt_ops for the x86_64 architectures
for a couple of days. Here's the result so far. I'm posting it soon for
early cooments. The more, the better.
It's obviously based on the previous work for i386, with the needed
modifications. By now, I'm able to boot a bare metal kernel, but there
are still some known issues, that are in my TODO
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 6/6] VMI timer patches
VMI timer code. It works by taking over the local APIC clock when APIC is
configured, which requires a couple hooks into the APIC code. The backend
timer code could be commonized into the timer infrastructure, but there are
some pieces missing (stolen time, in particular), and the exact semantics
of when to do accounting for NO_IDLE need to be shared between different
hypervisors as well. So
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 6/6] VMI timer patches
VMI timer code. It works by taking over the local APIC clock when APIC is
configured, which requires a couple hooks into the APIC code. The backend
timer code could be commonized into the timer infrastructure, but there are
some pieces missing (stolen time, in particular), and the exact semantics
of when to do accounting for NO_IDLE need to be shared between different
hypervisors as well. So
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 5/5] Vmi timer.patch
VMI timer code. It works by taking over the local APIC clock when APIC is
configured, which requires a couple hooks into the APIC code. The backend
timer code could be commonized into the timer infrastructure, but there are
some pieces missing (stolen time, in particular), and the exact semantics
of when to do accounting for NO_IDLE need to be shared between different
hypervisors as well. So
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 5/5] Vmi timer.patch
VMI timer code. It works by taking over the local APIC clock when APIC is
configured, which requires a couple hooks into the APIC code. The backend
timer code could be commonized into the timer infrastructure, but there are
some pieces missing (stolen time, in particular), and the exact semantics
of when to do accounting for NO_IDLE need to be shared between different
hypervisors as well. So
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 9/10] Vmi timer update.patch
Convert VMI timer to use clock events, making it properly able to use the NO_HZ
infrastructure. On UP systems, with no local APIC, we just continue to route
these events through the PIT. On systems with a local APIC, or SMP, we provide
a single source interrupt chip which creates the local timer IRQ. It actually
gets delivered by the APIC hardware, but we don't want to use the same local
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 9/10] Vmi timer update.patch
Convert VMI timer to use clock events, making it properly able to use the NO_HZ
infrastructure. On UP systems, with no local APIC, we just continue to route
these events through the PIT. On systems with a local APIC, or SMP, we provide
a single source interrupt chip which creates the local timer IRQ. It actually
gets delivered by the APIC hardware, but we don't want to use the same local
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 8/9] Vmi apic ops.diff
Use para_fill instead of directly setting the APIC ops to the result of the
vmi_get_function call - this allows one to implement a VMI ROM without
implementing APIC functions, just using the native APIC functions.
While doing this, I realized that there is a lot more cleanup that should
have been done. Basically, we should never assume that the ROM implements
a specific set of functions, and
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 8/9] Vmi apic ops.diff
Use para_fill instead of directly setting the APIC ops to the result of the
vmi_get_function call - this allows one to implement a VMI ROM without
implementing APIC functions, just using the native APIC functions.
While doing this, I realized that there is a lot more cleanup that should
have been done. Basically, we should never assume that the ROM implements
a specific set of functions, and