similar to: [PATCH 1/3] Vmi compile fix

Critical bugfixes for the VMI-Timer code. 1) Do not setup a one shot alarm if we are keeping the periodic alarm armed. Additionally, since the periodic alarm can be run at a lower rate than HZ, let's fixup the guard to the no-idle-hz mode appropriately. This fixes the bug where the no-idle-hz mode might have a higher interrupt rate than the non-idle case. 2) The interrupt handler can no

Critical bugfixes for the VMI-Timer code. 1) Do not setup a one shot alarm if we are keeping the periodic alarm armed. Additionally, since the periodic alarm can be run at a lower rate than HZ, let's fixup the guard to the no-idle-hz mode appropriately. This fixes the bug where the no-idle-hz mode might have a higher interrupt rate than the non-idle case. 2) The interrupt handler can no

Use para_fill instead of directly setting the APIC ops to the result of the vmi_get_function call - this allows one to implement a VMI ROM without implementing APIC functions, just using the native APIC functions. While doing this, I realized that there is a lot more cleanup that should have been done. Basically, we should never assume that the ROM implements a specific set of functions, and

Use para_fill instead of directly setting the APIC ops to the result of the vmi_get_function call - this allows one to implement a VMI ROM without implementing APIC functions, just using the native APIC functions. While doing this, I realized that there is a lot more cleanup that should have been done. Basically, we should never assume that the ROM implements a specific set of functions, and

VMI backend for paravirt-ops; fairly straightforward drop-in to paravirt-ops. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r d8711b11c1eb arch/i386/Kconfig --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:06 2006 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:13 2006 -0800 @@ -192,6 +192,15 @@ config PARAVIRT under a hypervisor, improving performance significantly. However, when

VMI backend for paravirt-ops; fairly straightforward drop-in to paravirt-ops. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r d8711b11c1eb arch/i386/Kconfig --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:06 2006 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:13 2006 -0800 @@ -192,6 +192,15 @@ config PARAVIRT under a hypervisor, improving performance significantly. However, when

Fairly straightforward implementation of VMI backend for paravirt-ops. Subject: VMI backend for paravirt-ops Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r d8711b11c1eb arch/i386/Kconfig --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:06 2006 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:13 2006 -0800 @@ -192,6 +192,15 @@ config PARAVIRT under a hypervisor, improving performance

Fairly straightforward implementation of VMI backend for paravirt-ops. Subject: VMI backend for paravirt-ops Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r d8711b11c1eb arch/i386/Kconfig --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:06 2006 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:13 2006 -0800 @@ -192,6 +192,15 @@ config PARAVIRT under a hypervisor, improving performance

More goo from hrtimers integration. We do compile and run properly with NO_HZ enabled. There was a period when we didn't because of a missing export, but that was since fixed. And with the clocksource code now firmly in place, we can get rid of code that fixes up the wallclock, since this is done in the common infrastructure. This actually fixes a timer bug as well, that was caused by

More goo from hrtimers integration. We do compile and run properly with NO_HZ enabled. There was a period when we didn't because of a missing export, but that was since fixed. And with the clocksource code now firmly in place, we can get rid of code that fixes up the wallclock, since this is done in the common infrastructure. This actually fixes a timer bug as well, that was caused by

Hi Peter, Removal of VMI(VMware's para-virtualization technique) is scheduled for 2.6.37, I was wondering what would be the right time frame for submitting a patch which does that. Does the x86-tip tree have any next branch where we can park this patch ? Below is the patch for your reference which just removes VMI specific bits, applies on top of x86-tip. There is also an opportunity to

Hi Peter, Removal of VMI(VMware's para-virtualization technique) is scheduled for 2.6.37, I was wondering what would be the right time frame for submitting a patch which does that. Does the x86-tip tree have any next branch where we can park this patch ? Below is the patch for your reference which just removes VMI specific bits, applies on top of x86-tip. There is also an opportunity to

Fairly straightforward code motion in system.h into the sub-arch layer. Affected functionality include control register accessors, which are virtualizable but with great overhead due to the #GP cost; wbinvd, and most importantly, halt and interrupt control, which is non-virtualizable. Since read_cr4_safe can never fault on a VMI kernel (P5+ processor is required for VMI), we can omit the fault

Fairly straightforward code motion in system.h into the sub-arch layer. Affected functionality include control register accessors, which are virtualizable but with great overhead due to the #GP cost; wbinvd, and most importantly, halt and interrupt control, which is non-virtualizable. Since read_cr4_safe can never fault on a VMI kernel (P5+ processor is required for VMI), we can omit the fault

The VMI ROM detection and code patching mechanism is illustrated in setup.c. There ROM is a binary block published by the hypervisor, and and there are certainly implications of this. ROMs certainly have a history of being proprietary, very differently licensed pieces of software, and mostly under non-free licenses. Before jumping to the conclusion that this is a bad thing, let us consider more

The VMI ROM detection and code patching mechanism is illustrated in setup.c. There ROM is a binary block published by the hypervisor, and and there are certainly implications of this. ROMs certainly have a history of being proprietary, very differently licensed pieces of software, and mostly under non-free licenses. Before jumping to the conclusion that this is a bad thing, let us consider more

Implement vmi_kmap_atomic_pte in terms of the backend set_linear_mapping operation. The conversion is rather straighforward; call kmap_atomic and then inform the hypervisor of the page mapping. The _flush_tlb damage is due to macros being pulled in from highmem.h. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r 2207a31829e7 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Mon

Implement vmi_kmap_atomic_pte in terms of the backend set_linear_mapping operation. The conversion is rather straighforward; call kmap_atomic and then inform the hypervisor of the page mapping. The _flush_tlb damage is due to macros being pulled in from highmem.h. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r 2207a31829e7 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Mon

Convert VMI timer to use clock events, making it properly able to use the NO_HZ infrastructure. On UP systems, with no local APIC, we just continue to route these events through the PIT. On systems with a local APIC, or SMP, we provide a single source interrupt chip which creates the local timer IRQ. It actually gets delivered by the APIC hardware, but we don't want to use the same local

Convert VMI timer to use clock events, making it properly able to use the NO_HZ infrastructure. On UP systems, with no local APIC, we just continue to route these events through the PIT. On systems with a local APIC, or SMP, we provide a single source interrupt chip which creates the local timer IRQ. It actually gets delivered by the APIC hardware, but we don't want to use the same local