similar to: [PATCH 2/3] Vmi initialize fs for smp

Critical fixes for SMP. Fix a couple functions which needed to be __devinit and fix a bogus parameter to AP startup that just so happened to work because the low virtual mapping of memory was still established. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r baf2e278a482 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Thu Mar 01 18:08:53 2007 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c

Critical fixes for SMP. Fix a couple functions which needed to be __devinit and fix a bogus parameter to AP startup that just so happened to work because the low virtual mapping of memory was still established. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r baf2e278a482 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Thu Mar 01 18:08:53 2007 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c

VMI backend for paravirt-ops; fairly straightforward drop-in to paravirt-ops. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r d8711b11c1eb arch/i386/Kconfig --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:06 2006 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:13 2006 -0800 @@ -192,6 +192,15 @@ config PARAVIRT under a hypervisor, improving performance significantly. However, when

VMI backend for paravirt-ops; fairly straightforward drop-in to paravirt-ops. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r d8711b11c1eb arch/i386/Kconfig --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:06 2006 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:13 2006 -0800 @@ -192,6 +192,15 @@ config PARAVIRT under a hypervisor, improving performance significantly. However, when

Fairly straightforward implementation of VMI backend for paravirt-ops. Subject: VMI backend for paravirt-ops Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r d8711b11c1eb arch/i386/Kconfig --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:06 2006 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:13 2006 -0800 @@ -192,6 +192,15 @@ config PARAVIRT under a hypervisor, improving performance

Fairly straightforward implementation of VMI backend for paravirt-ops. Subject: VMI backend for paravirt-ops Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r d8711b11c1eb arch/i386/Kconfig --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:06 2006 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig Tue Dec 12 13:51:13 2006 -0800 @@ -192,6 +192,15 @@ config PARAVIRT under a hypervisor, improving performance

SMP bootstrapping support. Just as in the physical platform model, the BSP is responsible for initializing the AP state prior to execution. The dependence on lots of processor state information is a design choice of our implementation. Conceivably, this could be a hypercall that awakens the same start of day state on APs as on the BSP. It is likely the AP startup and the start-of-day model will

SMP bootstrapping support. Just as in the physical platform model, the BSP is responsible for initializing the AP state prior to execution. The dependence on lots of processor state information is a design choice of our implementation. Conceivably, this could be a hypercall that awakens the same start of day state on APs as on the BSP. It is likely the AP startup and the start-of-day model will

Code changes and cleanup in the paravirt-ops queue caused the original fix for this in 2.6.21 to create conflicts. The easiest thing to do was back it out before applying the queue. In that case, this fix brings it back with the newly right properly tidied up paravirt-ops code. Wheee! Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r ecb571084874 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c ---

Code changes and cleanup in the paravirt-ops queue caused the original fix for this in 2.6.21 to create conflicts. The easiest thing to do was back it out before applying the queue. In that case, this fix brings it back with the newly right properly tidied up paravirt-ops code. Wheee! Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r ecb571084874 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c ---

Hi Peter, Removal of VMI(VMware's para-virtualization technique) is scheduled for 2.6.37, I was wondering what would be the right time frame for submitting a patch which does that. Does the x86-tip tree have any next branch where we can park this patch ? Below is the patch for your reference which just removes VMI specific bits, applies on top of x86-tip. There is also an opportunity to

Hi Peter, Removal of VMI(VMware's para-virtualization technique) is scheduled for 2.6.37, I was wondering what would be the right time frame for submitting a patch which does that. Does the x86-tip tree have any next branch where we can park this patch ? Below is the patch for your reference which just removes VMI specific bits, applies on top of x86-tip. There is also an opportunity to

Add VMI SMP boot hook. We emulate a regular boot sequence and use the same APIC IPI initiation, we just poke magic values to load into the CPU state when the startup IPI is received, rather than having to jump through a real mode trampoline. This is all that was needed to get SMP to work. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Subject: SMP boot hook for paravirt diff -r

Add VMI SMP boot hook. We emulate a regular boot sequence and use the same APIC IPI initiation, we just poke magic values to load into the CPU state when the startup IPI is received, rather than having to jump through a real mode trampoline. This is all that was needed to get SMP to work. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Subject: SMP boot hook for paravirt diff -r

Use para_fill instead of directly setting the APIC ops to the result of the vmi_get_function call - this allows one to implement a VMI ROM without implementing APIC functions, just using the native APIC functions. While doing this, I realized that there is a lot more cleanup that should have been done. Basically, we should never assume that the ROM implements a specific set of functions, and

Use para_fill instead of directly setting the APIC ops to the result of the vmi_get_function call - this allows one to implement a VMI ROM without implementing APIC functions, just using the native APIC functions. While doing this, I realized that there is a lot more cleanup that should have been done. Basically, we should never assume that the ROM implements a specific set of functions, and

Add VMI SMP boot hooks. This is a bit unclean (the #ifdef's), but I wanted a quick and dirty hack to get SMP up and working. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> =================================================================== --- a/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c @@ -698,5 +698,7 @@ struct paravirt_ops paravirt_ops = {

Add VMI SMP boot hooks. This is a bit unclean (the #ifdef's), but I wanted a quick and dirty hack to get SMP up and working. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> =================================================================== --- a/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c @@ -698,5 +698,7 @@ struct paravirt_ops paravirt_ops = {

Hi Andrew, This patch series adds to the end of the existing i386-gdt-cleanups patches: allow-per-cpu-variables-to-be-page-aligned.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-variables-for-gdt-pda.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-gdt-immediately-upon-boot.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-gdt-immediately-upon-boot-fix.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-clean-up-cpu_init.patch

Hi Andrew, This patch series adds to the end of the existing i386-gdt-cleanups patches: allow-per-cpu-variables-to-be-page-aligned.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-variables-for-gdt-pda.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-gdt-immediately-upon-boot.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-use-per-cpu-gdt-immediately-upon-boot-fix.patch i386-gdt-cleanups-clean-up-cpu_init.patch