Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "[RFC, PATCH] Fixup COMPAT_VDSO to work with CONFIG_PARAVIRT"
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise
questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which
requires mode C code, but less build script changes).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig
===================================================================
---
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise
questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which
requires mode C code, but less build script changes).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig
===================================================================
---
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise
questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which
requires mode C code, but less build script changes).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig
===================================================================
---
2007 Apr 18
4
[patch 0/2] Updates to compat VDSOs
Hi Andi,
Here's a couple of patches to fix up COMPAT_VDSO:
The first is a straightforward implementation of Jan's original idea
of relocating the VDSO to match its mapped location. Unlike Jan and
Zach's version, I changed it to relocate based on the phdrs rather than
the sections; the result is pleasantly compact.
The second patch takes advantage of the fact that all the
2007 Apr 18
4
[patch 0/2] Updates to compat VDSOs
Hi Andi,
Here's a couple of patches to fix up COMPAT_VDSO:
The first is a straightforward implementation of Jan's original idea
of relocating the VDSO to match its mapped location. Unlike Jan and
Zach's version, I changed it to relocate based on the phdrs rather than
the sections; the result is pleasantly compact.
The second patch takes advantage of the fact that all the
2007 Apr 18
4
[patch 0/4] Clean up asm/bugs.h, identify_cpu() and update COMPAT_VDSO
Hi Andi,
Four patches:
- clean up asm/bugs.h, by moving all the C code into its own C file
- split identify_cpu() into boot and secondary variants, so that
boot-time setup functions can be marked __init
- repost of the COMPAT_VDSO patches with a bit more robustness from
unknown DT_tags, and functions marked __init, since all this is
boot-time only setup.
Thanks,
J
--
2007 Apr 18
4
[patch 0/4] Clean up asm/bugs.h, identify_cpu() and update COMPAT_VDSO
Hi Andi,
Four patches:
- clean up asm/bugs.h, by moving all the C code into its own C file
- split identify_cpu() into boot and secondary variants, so that
boot-time setup functions can be marked __init
- repost of the COMPAT_VDSO patches with a bit more robustness from
unknown DT_tags, and functions marked __init, since all this is
boot-time only setup.
Thanks,
J
--
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH, experimental] i386 Allow the fixmap to be relocated at boot time
This most curious patch allows the fixmap on i386 to be unfixed. The =
result is that we can create a dynamically sizable hole at the top of =
kernel linear address space. I know at least some virtualization =
developers are interested in being able to achieve this to achieve =
run-time sizing of a hole in which a hypervisor can live, or at least to =
test out the performance
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH, experimental] i386 Allow the fixmap to be relocated at boot time
This most curious patch allows the fixmap on i386 to be unfixed. The =
result is that we can create a dynamically sizable hole at the top of =
kernel linear address space. I know at least some virtualization =
developers are interested in being able to achieve this to achieve =
run-time sizing of a hole in which a hypervisor can live, or at least to =
test out the performance
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 7/24] i386 Vmi memory hole
Create a configurable hole in the linear address space at the top
of memory. A more advanced interface is needed to negotiate how
much space the hypervisor is allowed to steal, but in the end, it
seems most likely that a fixed constant size will be chosen for
the compiled kernel, potentially propagated to an information
page used by paravirtual initialization to determine interface
compatibility.
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 7/24] i386 Vmi memory hole
Create a configurable hole in the linear address space at the top
of memory. A more advanced interface is needed to negotiate how
much space the hypervisor is allowed to steal, but in the end, it
seems most likely that a fixed constant size will be chosen for
the compiled kernel, potentially propagated to an information
page used by paravirtual initialization to determine interface
compatibility.
2007 Apr 18
3
[patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 13:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Subject: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> commit 3bbf54725467d604698721384d858b5983b87e8f disables the VDSO for
> CONFIG_PARAVIRT kernels. This #ifdeffery was a bad change: the VDSO is
> an essential component of Linux, and this change forces all of them to
> use
2007 Apr 18
3
[patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 13:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Subject: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> commit 3bbf54725467d604698721384d858b5983b87e8f disables the VDSO for
> CONFIG_PARAVIRT kernels. This #ifdeffery was a bad change: the VDSO is
> an essential component of Linux, and this change forces all of them to
> use
2018 May 23
0
[PATCH v3 23/27] x86/modules: Adapt module loading for PIE support
Adapt module loading to support PIE relocations. Generate dynamic GOT if
a symbol requires it but no entry exist in the kernel GOT.
Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the
KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com>
---
arch/x86/Makefile | 4 +
arch/x86/include/asm/module.h
2017 Oct 04
1
[PATCH 11/13] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt alternatives infrastructure
With CONFIG_PARAVIRT, the kernel .text is littered with a bunch of calls
to pv_irq_ops function pointers, like:
callq *0xffffffff81e3a400 (pv_irq_ops.save_fl)
In non-Xen paravirt environments -- including native, KVM, Hyper-V, and
VMware -- the above code gets patched by native_patch() to look like
this instead:
pushfq
pop %rax
nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
So in most scenarios,
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] (with benchmarks) binary patching of paravirt_ops call sites
Hi all,
Sorry for the delay. This implements binary patching of call sites for
interrupt-related paravirt ops, since no-doubt Andi wasn't the only one
to believe this approach is slow.
The benchmarks were done on a UP 3GHz Pentium 4 with 512MB of RAM.
2.6.17-rc4 vs 2.6.17-rc4 with CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y vs 2.6.17-rc4
CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y with patch. Summary: with binary patching, the
difference
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] (with benchmarks) binary patching of paravirt_ops call sites
Hi all,
Sorry for the delay. This implements binary patching of call sites for
interrupt-related paravirt ops, since no-doubt Andi wasn't the only one
to believe this approach is slow.
The benchmarks were done on a UP 3GHz Pentium 4 with 512MB of RAM.
2.6.17-rc4 vs 2.6.17-rc4 with CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y vs 2.6.17-rc4
CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y with patch. Summary: with binary patching, the
difference
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] exec-shield style vdso move.
So, is everyone happy with this smerge of Ingo and Gerd's work?
Reposted below.
Thanks,
Rusty.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: FW: argh]]
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] exec-shield style vdso move.
So, is everyone happy with this smerge of Ingo and Gerd's work?
Reposted below.
Thanks,
Rusty.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: FW: argh]]
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
2003 Jan 07
1
klibc-0.72 released
This adds [f]getc() and fgets() for parsing config files. Probably hard
to avoid. Still trying to decide if I actually want to add system() or not.
-hpa