similar to: SMP lockup in virtualized environment

Hi everybody, Is the only way to use asterisk _not_ as root to change the permission of all the directories where asterisk need to create a file? ("/var/run/", "/var/log/asterisk/messages") any help will be appreciated, Cyprien

Hi, when creating a bigger (> 50 GB) HVM guest with maxmem > memory we get softlockups from time to time. kernel: [ 802.084335] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [xend:31351] I tracked this down to the call of xc_domain_set_pod_target() and further p2m_pod_set_mem_target(). Unfortunately I can this check only with xen-4.2.2 as I don''t have a machine with enough memory for

The softlockup watchdog is currently a nuisance in a virtual machine, since the whole system could have the CPU stolen from it for a long period of time. While it would be unlikely for a guest domain to be denied timer interrupts for over 10s, it could happen and any softlockup message would be completely spurious. Earlier I proposed that sched_clock() return time in unstolen nanoseconds, which

The softlockup watchdog is currently a nuisance in a virtual machine, since the whole system could have the CPU stolen from it for a long period of time. While it would be unlikely for a guest domain to be denied timer interrupts for over 10s, it could happen and any softlockup message would be completely spurious. Earlier I proposed that sched_clock() return time in unstolen nanoseconds, which

Not sure if this was the last email on this.? If not ignore me. However I found a post for new operating systems that says to set the watchdog_thresh value instead of softlockup_thresh.? http://askubuntu.com/questions/592412/why-is-there-no-proc-sys-kernel-softlockup-thresh this is an Ubuntu post, but on my CentOS 7 system this parameter exists, and softlockup_thresh does not.??I have set it but

Here's couple of patches to improve the softlockup watchdog. The first changes the softlockup timer from using jiffies to sched_clock() as a timebase. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as counting unstolen time, so time stolen by the hypervisor won't cause the watchdog to bite. The second adds per-cpu enable flags for the watchdog timer. This allows the timer to be disabled when the

Here's couple of patches to improve the softlockup watchdog. The first changes the softlockup timer from using jiffies to sched_clock() as a timebase. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as counting unstolen time, so time stolen by the hypervisor won't cause the watchdog to bite. The second adds per-cpu enable flags for the watchdog timer. This allows the timer to be disabled when the

Hi, I''ve played a little bit with the xen scheduler to enhance the performance of paravirtualized SMP domains including Dom0. Under heavy system load a vcpu might be descheduled in a critical section. This in turn leads to even higher system load if other vcpus of the same domain are waiting for the descheduled vcpu to leave the critical section. I''ve created a patch for xen

Hi Ingo, This series of patches implements a number of improvements to the softlockup watchdog and its users. They are: 1. Make the watchdog ignore stolen time When running under a hypervisor, the kernel may lose an arbitrary amount of time as "stolen time". This may cause the softlockup watchdog to trigger spruiously. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as measuring unstolen time,

Hi Ingo, This series of patches implements a number of improvements to the softlockup watchdog and its users. They are: 1. Make the watchdog ignore stolen time When running under a hypervisor, the kernel may lose an arbitrary amount of time as "stolen time". This may cause the softlockup watchdog to trigger spruiously. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as measuring unstolen time,

On 27/02/14 13:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 27/02/2014 13:11, David Vrabel ha scritto: >>> > This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock code >>> > by enabling the queue head to kick the lock holder CPU, if known, >>> > in when the lock isn't released for a certain amount of time. It >>> > also enables the mutual

On 27/02/14 13:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 27/02/2014 13:11, David Vrabel ha scritto: >>> > This patch adds para-virtualization support to the queue spinlock code >>> > by enabling the queue head to kick the lock holder CPU, if known, >>> > in when the lock isn't released for a certain amount of time. It >>> > also enables the mutual

On 02/27/2014 08:15 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: [...] >> But neither of the VCPUs being kicked here are halted -- they're either >> running or runnable (descheduled by the hypervisor). > > /me actually looks at Waiman's code... > > Right, this is really different from pvticketlocks, where the *unlock* > primitive wakes up a sleeping VCPU. It is more similar to PLE

On 02/27/2014 08:15 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: [...] >> But neither of the VCPUs being kicked here are halted -- they're either >> running or runnable (descheduled by the hypervisor). > > /me actually looks at Waiman's code... > > Right, this is really different from pvticketlocks, where the *unlock* > primitive wakes up a sleeping VCPU. It is more similar to PLE

Reduce special casing of xen_cpuid() by using cpu capabilities instead of faked cpuid nodes. This cleanup enables us remove the hypervisor specific set_cpu_features callback as the same effect can be reached via setup_[clear|force]_cpu_cap(). Removing the rest faked nodes from xen_cpuid() requires some more work as the remaining cases (mwait leafs and extended topology info) have to be handled

Reduce special casing of xen_cpuid() by using cpu capabilities instead of faked cpuid nodes. This cleanup enables us remove the hypervisor specific set_cpu_features callback as the same effect can be reached via setup_[clear|force]_cpu_cap(). Removing the rest faked nodes from xen_cpuid() requires some more work as the remaining cases (mwait leafs and extended topology info) have to be handled

Hi, I'm seeing a problem with 4.7 where, very rarely, the system seems to "lockup". No panic is given. I was able to track it down to all processors were halted (in the idle loop) since machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=1. The system is a 2 physical XEON procs with hyperthreading enabled. The system was behaving as though the 8254 system clock was not going off. The only thing I can think of is

2014-05-07 11:01-0400, Waiman Long: > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> > > Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending > bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second > cacheline. I think there is an unwanted scenario on virtual machines: 1) VCPU sets the pending bit and start spinning. 2) Pending VCPU gets

2014-05-07 11:01-0400, Waiman Long: > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> > > Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending > bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second > cacheline. I think there is an unwanted scenario on virtual machines: 1) VCPU sets the pending bit and start spinning. 2) Pending VCPU gets

Hi everybody, I'm trying to use Asterisk as SUA with SER. But Asterisk doesn't succeed to register the Asterisk user to SER... the standard error output of SER tell me: "ERROR: forward_msg: no 2nd via found in reply" the SIP message looks like: to 193.175.133.19:5060 Retransmitting #5 (no NAT): REGISTER sip:potemkin.fokus.fraunhofer.de SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP