similar to: [RFC, PATCH 4/5] Paravirt_ops drop internal patches.patch

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[RFC, PATCH 4/5] Paravirt_ops drop internal patches.patch"

2007 Jul 09
1
[PATCH RFC] first cut at splitting up paravirt_ops
Here's a first attempt at splitting up paravirt_ops into more specific chunks. Its pretty clunky and chunky; mostly just a lot of replacement. The grouping of ops is very first cut; I'm open to suggestions about what groups should exist and what ops they each should contain. The only slightly subtle part is that I've kept the structures wrapped in a paravirt_ops structure,
2007 Jul 09
1
[PATCH RFC] first cut at splitting up paravirt_ops
Here's a first attempt at splitting up paravirt_ops into more specific chunks. Its pretty clunky and chunky; mostly just a lot of replacement. The grouping of ops is very first cut; I'm open to suggestions about what groups should exist and what ops they each should contain. The only slightly subtle part is that I've kept the structures wrapped in a paravirt_ops structure,
2007 Sep 28
2
[PATCH RFC] paravirt_ops: refactor struct paravirt_ops into smaller pv_*_ops
This patch refactors the paravirt_ops structure into groups of functionally related ops: pv_info - random info, rather than function entrypoints pv_init_ops - functions used at boot time (some for module_init too) pv_misc_ops - lazy mode, which didn't fit well anywhere else pv_time_ops - time-related functions pv_cpu_ops - various privileged instruction ops pv_irq_ops - operations for
2007 Sep 28
2
[PATCH RFC] paravirt_ops: refactor struct paravirt_ops into smaller pv_*_ops
This patch refactors the paravirt_ops structure into groups of functionally related ops: pv_info - random info, rather than function entrypoints pv_init_ops - functions used at boot time (some for module_init too) pv_misc_ops - lazy mode, which didn't fit well anywhere else pv_time_ops - time-related functions pv_cpu_ops - various privileged instruction ops pv_irq_ops - operations for
2007 Oct 09
2
[PATCH RFC REPOST 1/2] paravirt: refactor struct paravirt_ops into smaller pv_*_ops
[ I think this is a straight repost this patch, which addresses all the previous comments. I'd like to submit this for .24 as the basis for a unified paravirt_ops. Any objections? ] This patch refactors the paravirt_ops structure into groups of functionally related ops: pv_info - random info, rather than function entrypoints pv_init_ops - functions used at boot time (some for module_init
2007 Oct 09
2
[PATCH RFC REPOST 1/2] paravirt: refactor struct paravirt_ops into smaller pv_*_ops
[ I think this is a straight repost this patch, which addresses all the previous comments. I'd like to submit this for .24 as the basis for a unified paravirt_ops. Any objections? ] This patch refactors the paravirt_ops structure into groups of functionally related ops: pv_info - random info, rather than function entrypoints pv_init_ops - functions used at boot time (some for module_init
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 4/6] SMP boot hook for paravirt
Add VMI SMP boot hook. We emulate a regular boot sequence and use the same APIC IPI initiation, we just poke magic values to load into the CPU state when the startup IPI is received, rather than having to jump through a real mode trampoline. This is all that was needed to get SMP to work. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Subject: SMP boot hook for paravirt diff -r
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 4/6] SMP boot hook for paravirt
Add VMI SMP boot hook. We emulate a regular boot sequence and use the same APIC IPI initiation, we just poke magic values to load into the CPU state when the startup IPI is received, rather than having to jump through a real mode trampoline. This is all that was needed to get SMP to work. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Subject: SMP boot hook for paravirt diff -r
2015 Nov 17
1
[PATCH] paravirt: remove unused pv_apic_ops structure
The only member of that structure is startup_ipi_hook which is always set to paravirt_nop. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 9 --------- arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 10 ---------- arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 3 --- arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 8 -------- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
2015 Nov 17
1
[PATCH] paravirt: remove unused pv_apic_ops structure
The only member of that structure is startup_ipi_hook which is always set to paravirt_nop. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 9 --------- arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 10 ---------- arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 3 --- arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 8 -------- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 3/5] Paravirt smp.patch
Add VMI SMP boot hooks. This is a bit unclean (the #ifdef's), but I wanted a quick and dirty hack to get SMP up and working. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> =================================================================== --- a/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c @@ -698,5 +698,7 @@ struct paravirt_ops paravirt_ops = {
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 3/5] Paravirt smp.patch
Add VMI SMP boot hooks. This is a bit unclean (the #ifdef's), but I wanted a quick and dirty hack to get SMP up and working. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> =================================================================== --- a/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c @@ -698,5 +698,7 @@ struct paravirt_ops paravirt_ops = {
2007 Apr 18
2
[RFC, PATCH 9/24] i386 Vmi smp support
SMP bootstrapping support. Just as in the physical platform model, the BSP is responsible for initializing the AP state prior to execution. The dependence on lots of processor state information is a design choice of our implementation. Conceivably, this could be a hypercall that awakens the same start of day state on APs as on the BSP. It is likely the AP startup and the start-of-day model will
2007 Apr 18
2
[RFC, PATCH 9/24] i386 Vmi smp support
SMP bootstrapping support. Just as in the physical platform model, the BSP is responsible for initializing the AP state prior to execution. The dependence on lots of processor state information is a design choice of our implementation. Conceivably, this could be a hypercall that awakens the same start of day state on APs as on the BSP. It is likely the AP startup and the start-of-day model will
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] Add smp_ops interface
Add a smp_ops interface. This abstracts the API defined by <linux/smp.h> for use within arch/i386. The primary intent is that it be used by a paravirtualizing hypervisor to implement SMP, but it could also be used by non-APIC-using sub-architectures. This is related to CONFIG_PARAVIRT, but is implemented unconditionally since it is simpler that way and not a highly performance-sensitive
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] Add smp_ops interface
Add a smp_ops interface. This abstracts the API defined by <linux/smp.h> for use within arch/i386. The primary intent is that it be used by a paravirtualizing hypervisor to implement SMP, but it could also be used by non-APIC-using sub-architectures. This is related to CONFIG_PARAVIRT, but is implemented unconditionally since it is simpler that way and not a highly performance-sensitive
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 9/9] Vmi smp fixes.patch
Critical fixes for SMP. Fix a couple functions which needed to be __devinit and fix a bogus parameter to AP startup that just so happened to work because the low virtual mapping of memory was still established. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r baf2e278a482 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Thu Mar 01 18:08:53 2007 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 9/9] Vmi smp fixes.patch
Critical fixes for SMP. Fix a couple functions which needed to be __devinit and fix a bogus parameter to AP startup that just so happened to work because the low virtual mapping of memory was still established. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r baf2e278a482 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Thu Mar 01 18:08:53 2007 -0800 +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c
2008 Jul 15
4
Patch from LKML
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Suresh Siddha > <suresh.b.siddha at intel.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:19:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> > >> fix for pv. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel at gmail.com> > >> > >> --- > >> arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 5 ---- > >>
2008 Jul 15
4
Patch from LKML
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Suresh Siddha > <suresh.b.siddha at intel.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:19:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> > >> fix for pv. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel at gmail.com> > >> > >> --- > >> arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 5 ---- > >>