similar to: [PATCH 9/10] Vmi timer update.patch

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "[PATCH 9/10] Vmi timer update.patch"

2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 6/6] VMI timer patches
VMI timer code. It works by taking over the local APIC clock when APIC is configured, which requires a couple hooks into the APIC code. The backend timer code could be commonized into the timer infrastructure, but there are some pieces missing (stolen time, in particular), and the exact semantics of when to do accounting for NO_IDLE need to be shared between different hypervisors as well. So
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 6/6] VMI timer patches
VMI timer code. It works by taking over the local APIC clock when APIC is configured, which requires a couple hooks into the APIC code. The backend timer code could be commonized into the timer infrastructure, but there are some pieces missing (stolen time, in particular), and the exact semantics of when to do accounting for NO_IDLE need to be shared between different hypervisors as well. So
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 5/5] Vmi timer.patch
VMI timer code. It works by taking over the local APIC clock when APIC is configured, which requires a couple hooks into the APIC code. The backend timer code could be commonized into the timer infrastructure, but there are some pieces missing (stolen time, in particular), and the exact semantics of when to do accounting for NO_IDLE need to be shared between different hypervisors as well. So
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 5/5] Vmi timer.patch
VMI timer code. It works by taking over the local APIC clock when APIC is configured, which requires a couple hooks into the APIC code. The backend timer code could be commonized into the timer infrastructure, but there are some pieces missing (stolen time, in particular), and the exact semantics of when to do accounting for NO_IDLE need to be shared between different hypervisors as well. So
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 23/24] i386 Vmi timer patch
In a virtualized environment, virtual machines will time share the system with each other and with other processes running on the host system. Therefore, a VM's virtual CPUs (VCPUs) will be executing on the host's physical CPUs (pcpus) for only some portion of time. The VMI exposes a paravirtual view of time to the guest operating systems so that they may operate more effectively in a
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 23/24] i386 Vmi timer patch
In a virtualized environment, virtual machines will time share the system with each other and with other processes running on the host system. Therefore, a VM's virtual CPUs (VCPUs) will be executing on the host's physical CPUs (pcpus) for only some portion of time. The VMI exposes a paravirtual view of time to the guest operating systems so that they may operate more effectively in a
2007 Apr 18
31
[PATCH 00/28] Updates for firstfloor paravirt-ops patches
Hi Andi, This is a set of updates for the firstfloor patch queue. Quick rundown: revert-mm-x86_64-mm-account-for-module-percpu-space-separately-from-kernel-percpu.patch separate-module-percpu-space.patch Update the module percpu accounting patch fix-ff-allow-percpu-variables-to-be-page-aligned.patch Make sure the percpu memory allocation is page-aligned
2007 Apr 18
31
[PATCH 00/28] Updates for firstfloor paravirt-ops patches
Hi Andi, This is a set of updates for the firstfloor patch queue. Quick rundown: revert-mm-x86_64-mm-account-for-module-percpu-space-separately-from-kernel-percpu.patch separate-module-percpu-space.patch Update the module percpu accounting patch fix-ff-allow-percpu-variables-to-be-page-aligned.patch Make sure the percpu memory allocation is page-aligned
2010 Aug 23
1
Removing VMI kernel support from 2.6.37
Hi Peter, Removal of VMI(VMware's para-virtualization technique) is scheduled for 2.6.37, I was wondering what would be the right time frame for submitting a patch which does that. Does the x86-tip tree have any next branch where we can park this patch ? Below is the patch for your reference which just removes VMI specific bits, applies on top of x86-tip. There is also an opportunity to
2010 Aug 23
1
Removing VMI kernel support from 2.6.37
Hi Peter, Removal of VMI(VMware's para-virtualization technique) is scheduled for 2.6.37, I was wondering what would be the right time frame for submitting a patch which does that. Does the x86-tip tree have any next branch where we can park this patch ? Below is the patch for your reference which just removes VMI specific bits, applies on top of x86-tip. There is also an opportunity to
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 24/24] i386 Vmi no idle hz
A NO_IDLE_HZ implementation is provided for i386 VMI builds. When a VCPU enters its idle loop, it disables its periodic alarm and sets up a one shot alarm for the next time event. That way, it does not become ready to run just to service the periodic alarm interrupt. Instead, it can remain halted until there is some real work pending for it. This allows the hypervisor to use the physical
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 24/24] i386 Vmi no idle hz
A NO_IDLE_HZ implementation is provided for i386 VMI builds. When a VCPU enters its idle loop, it disables its periodic alarm and sets up a one shot alarm for the next time event. That way, it does not become ready to run just to service the periodic alarm interrupt. Instead, it can remain halted until there is some real work pending for it. This allows the hypervisor to use the physical
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 1/9] Vmi timer fixes round two.patch
Critical bugfixes for the VMI-Timer code. 1) Do not setup a one shot alarm if we are keeping the periodic alarm armed. Additionally, since the periodic alarm can be run at a lower rate than HZ, let's fixup the guard to the no-idle-hz mode appropriately. This fixes the bug where the no-idle-hz mode might have a higher interrupt rate than the non-idle case. 2) The interrupt handler can no
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 1/9] Vmi timer fixes round two.patch
Critical bugfixes for the VMI-Timer code. 1) Do not setup a one shot alarm if we are keeping the periodic alarm armed. Additionally, since the periodic alarm can be run at a lower rate than HZ, let's fixup the guard to the no-idle-hz mode appropriately. This fixes the bug where the no-idle-hz mode might have a higher interrupt rate than the non-idle case. 2) The interrupt handler can no
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 3/9] Vmi cpu cycles.patch
In order to share the common code in tsc.c which does CPU Khz calibration, we need to make an accurate value of CPU speed available to the tsc.c code. This value loses a lot of precision in a VM because of the timing differences with real hardware, but we need it to be as precise as possible so the guest can make accurate time calculations with the cycle counters. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 3/9] Vmi cpu cycles.patch
In order to share the common code in tsc.c which does CPU Khz calibration, we need to make an accurate value of CPU speed available to the tsc.c code. This value loses a lot of precision in a VM because of the timing differences with real hardware, but we need it to be as precise as possible so the guest can make accurate time calculations with the cycle counters. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 7/9] Fix nohz compile.patch
More goo from hrtimers integration. We do compile and run properly with NO_HZ enabled. There was a period when we didn't because of a missing export, but that was since fixed. And with the clocksource code now firmly in place, we can get rid of code that fixes up the wallclock, since this is done in the common infrastructure. This actually fixes a timer bug as well, that was caused by
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 7/9] Fix nohz compile.patch
More goo from hrtimers integration. We do compile and run properly with NO_HZ enabled. There was a period when we didn't because of a missing export, but that was since fixed. And with the clocksource code now firmly in place, we can get rid of code that fixes up the wallclock, since this is done in the common infrastructure. This actually fixes a timer bug as well, that was caused by
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 8/9] Vmi apic ops.diff
Use para_fill instead of directly setting the APIC ops to the result of the vmi_get_function call - this allows one to implement a VMI ROM without implementing APIC functions, just using the native APIC functions. While doing this, I realized that there is a lot more cleanup that should have been done. Basically, we should never assume that the ROM implements a specific set of functions, and
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 8/9] Vmi apic ops.diff
Use para_fill instead of directly setting the APIC ops to the result of the vmi_get_function call - this allows one to implement a VMI ROM without implementing APIC functions, just using the native APIC functions. While doing this, I realized that there is a lot more cleanup that should have been done. Basically, we should never assume that the ROM implements a specific set of functions, and