Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "[patch 0/2] Updates to compat VDSOs"
2007 Apr 18
4
[patch 0/4] Clean up asm/bugs.h, identify_cpu() and update COMPAT_VDSO
Hi Andi,
Four patches:
- clean up asm/bugs.h, by moving all the C code into its own C file
- split identify_cpu() into boot and secondary variants, so that
boot-time setup functions can be marked __init
- repost of the COMPAT_VDSO patches with a bit more robustness from
unknown DT_tags, and functions marked __init, since all this is
boot-time only setup.
Thanks,
J
--
2007 Apr 18
4
[patch 0/4] Clean up asm/bugs.h, identify_cpu() and update COMPAT_VDSO
Hi Andi,
Four patches:
- clean up asm/bugs.h, by moving all the C code into its own C file
- split identify_cpu() into boot and secondary variants, so that
boot-time setup functions can be marked __init
- repost of the COMPAT_VDSO patches with a bit more robustness from
unknown DT_tags, and functions marked __init, since all this is
boot-time only setup.
Thanks,
J
--
2007 Apr 18
2
[RFC, PATCH] Fixup COMPAT_VDSO to work with CONFIG_PARAVIRT
Paravirt-ops guests which move the fixmap also end up moving the syscall =
VDSO. This fails if it is prelinked at a fixed address, which is why =
COMPAT_VDSO is broken under CONFIG_VMI (and also under CONFIG_XEN). =
Several options are available to try to address this. Jan had cooked up =
a patch for Xen that used build magic to find the parts of the VDSO that =
need relocation. I
2007 Apr 18
2
[RFC, PATCH] Fixup COMPAT_VDSO to work with CONFIG_PARAVIRT
Paravirt-ops guests which move the fixmap also end up moving the syscall =
VDSO. This fails if it is prelinked at a fixed address, which is why =
COMPAT_VDSO is broken under CONFIG_VMI (and also under CONFIG_XEN). =
Several options are available to try to address this. Jan had cooked up =
a patch for Xen that used build magic to find the parts of the VDSO that =
need relocation. I
2007 Apr 18
3
[patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 13:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Subject: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> commit 3bbf54725467d604698721384d858b5983b87e8f disables the VDSO for
> CONFIG_PARAVIRT kernels. This #ifdeffery was a bad change: the VDSO is
> an essential component of Linux, and this change forces all of them to
> use
2007 Apr 18
3
[patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 13:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Subject: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> commit 3bbf54725467d604698721384d858b5983b87e8f disables the VDSO for
> CONFIG_PARAVIRT kernels. This #ifdeffery was a bad change: the VDSO is
> an essential component of Linux, and this change forces all of them to
> use
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise
questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which
requires mode C code, but less build script changes).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig
===================================================================
---
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise
questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which
requires mode C code, but less build script changes).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig
===================================================================
---
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise
questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which
requires mode C code, but less build script changes).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig
===================================================================
---
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] exec-shield style vdso move.
So, is everyone happy with this smerge of Ingo and Gerd's work?
Reposted below.
Thanks,
Rusty.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: FW: argh]]
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] exec-shield style vdso move.
So, is everyone happy with this smerge of Ingo and Gerd's work?
Reposted below.
Thanks,
Rusty.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: FW: argh]]
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
2007 Apr 18
7
[patch 0/6] Various cleanups
Hi Andi,
Here's a little batch of cleanups:
- re-enable VDSO when PARAVIRT is enabled
- make the parainstructions symbols match the
other altinstructions naming convention
- add kernel command-line options to disable altinstructions for
smp and pv_ops
Oh, and I'm mailing your noreplacement patch back at you, for no
particularly good reason.
J
--
2007 Apr 18
7
[patch 0/6] Various cleanups
Hi Andi,
Here's a little batch of cleanups:
- re-enable VDSO when PARAVIRT is enabled
- make the parainstructions symbols match the
other altinstructions naming convention
- add kernel command-line options to disable altinstructions for
smp and pv_ops
Oh, and I'm mailing your noreplacement patch back at you, for no
particularly good reason.
J
--
2007 Apr 18
1
PATCH: Fix VMI and COMPAT_VDSO for 2.6.21
VMI is broken under COMPAT_VDSO, as Xen and other non hardware assisted
hypervisors will be. I have been working on a fix for this which works
for older glibcs that panic when the new relocatable VDSO is used.
However, I believe at this time that the fix is going to be too radical
to consider at this stage in the release of 2.6.21. We don't expect
this config option to be turned on by
2007 Apr 18
1
PATCH: Fix VMI and COMPAT_VDSO for 2.6.21
VMI is broken under COMPAT_VDSO, as Xen and other non hardware assisted
hypervisors will be. I have been working on a fix for this which works
for older glibcs that panic when the new relocatable VDSO is used.
However, I believe at this time that the fix is going to be too radical
to consider at this stage in the release of 2.6.21. We don't expect
this config option to be turned on by
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 7/24] i386 Vmi memory hole
Create a configurable hole in the linear address space at the top
of memory. A more advanced interface is needed to negotiate how
much space the hypervisor is allowed to steal, but in the end, it
seems most likely that a fixed constant size will be chosen for
the compiled kernel, potentially propagated to an information
page used by paravirtual initialization to determine interface
compatibility.
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 7/24] i386 Vmi memory hole
Create a configurable hole in the linear address space at the top
of memory. A more advanced interface is needed to negotiate how
much space the hypervisor is allowed to steal, but in the end, it
seems most likely that a fixed constant size will be chosen for
the compiled kernel, potentially propagated to an information
page used by paravirtual initialization to determine interface
compatibility.
2007 Apr 18
2
Why disable vdso by default with CONFIG_PARAVIRT?
Hi Andi,
What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with
Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
J
2007 Apr 18
2
Why disable vdso by default with CONFIG_PARAVIRT?
Hi Andi,
What problem do they cause together? There's certainly no problem with
Xen+vdso (in fact, its actually very useful so that it picks up the
right libc with Xen-friendly TLS).
J
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 2/2] x86: clean up identify_cpu
identify_cpu() is used to identify both the boot CPU and secondary
CPUs, but it performs some actions which only apply to the boot CPU.
Those functions are therefore really __init functions, but because
they're called by identify_cpu(), they must be marked __cpuinit.
This patch splits identify_cpu() into identify_boot_cpu() and
identify_secondary_cpu(), and calls the appropriate init