Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[patch 9/9] lguest: the documentation, example launcher"
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH LGUEST X86_64 07/13] lguest64 loader
plain text document attachment (lguest64-loader.patch)
I noticed that the lguest loader code for i386 was in
Documentation/lguest. Well, that's fine (I guess) but
it can't just be for i386. So I made a separate directory
to put the loader code in. So now we have:
Documentation/lguest/i386/... for the lguest i386 loader.
and
Documentation/lguest/x86_64/... for the lguest x86_64
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH LGUEST X86_64 07/13] lguest64 loader
plain text document attachment (lguest64-loader.patch)
I noticed that the lguest loader code for i386 was in
Documentation/lguest. Well, that's fine (I guess) but
it can't just be for i386. So I made a separate directory
to put the loader code in. So now we have:
Documentation/lguest/i386/... for the lguest i386 loader.
and
Documentation/lguest/x86_64/... for the lguest x86_64
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 0/2] Use a single loader for i386 and x86_64
This patch moves lguest.c one level bellow, and enhances it with the
ability to kick off 64 binaries. It would be much easier to just ifdef
functions, but I have x86_64 machines loading 32-bit kernels as a longer
goal, and that's why the patch features the load_elf_header() function.
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
--
Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Red Hat Inc.
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 0/2] Use a single loader for i386 and x86_64
This patch moves lguest.c one level bellow, and enhances it with the
ability to kick off 64 binaries. It would be much easier to just ifdef
functions, but I have x86_64 machines loading 32-bit kernels as a longer
goal, and that's why the patch features the load_elf_header() function.
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
--
Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Red Hat Inc.
2007 Jul 20
2
[PATCH] Remove -static from Documentation/lguest/Makefile
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 23:13 +0300, S.?a?lar Onur wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Remove -static from Documentation/lguest/Makefile, most distros only provides shared library form of zlib in their default installation.
> And shared linking also provides litte tiny security for hypotetical security problems will be introduced by zlib :).
Unfortunately, this introduces a security hole. See, the
2007 Jul 20
2
[PATCH] Remove -static from Documentation/lguest/Makefile
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 23:13 +0300, S.?a?lar Onur wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Remove -static from Documentation/lguest/Makefile, most distros only provides shared library form of zlib in their default installation.
> And shared linking also provides litte tiny security for hypotetical security problems will be introduced by zlib :).
Unfortunately, this introduces a security hole. See, the
2007 Dec 21
0
[kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 1/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
From 5d85cee1fb14608b79b5b6103d8be2d90bb76ca4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:30:26 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] virtio: simplify config mechanism.
Previously we used a type/len pair within the config space, but this
seems overkill. We now simply define a structure which represents the
layout in the config space: the config space can
2007 Dec 21
0
[kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 1/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions
From 5d85cee1fb14608b79b5b6103d8be2d90bb76ca4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:30:26 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] virtio: simplify config mechanism.
Previously we used a type/len pair within the config space, but this
seems overkill. We now simply define a structure which represents the
layout in the config space: the config space can
2007 May 04
1
[PATCH 1/3] Documentation and example updates
1) Example code: old libc headers don't have SIOCBRADDIF, and old zlibs
don't have gzdirect() -- it's a sanity check anyway.
2) Some people don't build in their source directories, so .config
isn't there (thanks to Tony Breeds <tony@bakeyournoodle.com>).
3) Point out that guest and host kernel are usually the same.
4) Set the "no checksum" option on the
2007 May 04
1
[PATCH 1/3] Documentation and example updates
1) Example code: old libc headers don't have SIOCBRADDIF, and old zlibs
don't have gzdirect() -- it's a sanity check anyway.
2) Some people don't build in their source directories, so .config
isn't there (thanks to Tony Breeds <tony@bakeyournoodle.com>).
3) Point out that guest and host kernel are usually the same.
4) Set the "no checksum" option on the
2007 Sep 25
50
[patch 00/43] lguest: Patches for 2.6.24 (and patchbomb test)
Hi all,
These are the patches I'm planning to submit for 2.6.24. Comments
gratefully accepted. Along with the usual cleanups and improvements are Jes'
de-i386-ification patches, and a new "virtio" mechanism designed to be shared
with KVM (and hopefully other hypervisors).
Cheers,
Rusty.
Documentation/lguest/Makefile | 30
Documentation/lguest/lguest.c
2007 Sep 25
50
[patch 00/43] lguest: Patches for 2.6.24 (and patchbomb test)
Hi all,
These are the patches I'm planning to submit for 2.6.24. Comments
gratefully accepted. Along with the usual cleanups and improvements are Jes'
de-i386-ification patches, and a new "virtio" mechanism designed to be shared
with KVM (and hopefully other hypervisors).
Cheers,
Rusty.
Documentation/lguest/Makefile | 30
Documentation/lguest/lguest.c
2008 Jul 03
2
[PATCH 1/3] tun: Interface to query tun/tap features.
The problem with introducing checksum offload and gso to tun is they
need to set dev->features to enable GSO and/or checksumming, which is
supposed to be done before register_netdevice(), ie. as part of
TUNSETIFF.
Unfortunately, TUNSETIFF has always just ignored flags it doesn't
understand, so there's no good way of detecting whether the kernel
supports new IFF_ flags.
This patch
2008 Jul 03
2
[PATCH 1/3] tun: Interface to query tun/tap features.
The problem with introducing checksum offload and gso to tun is they
need to set dev->features to enable GSO and/or checksumming, which is
supposed to be done before register_netdevice(), ie. as part of
TUNSETIFF.
Unfortunately, TUNSETIFF has always just ignored flags it doesn't
understand, so there's no good way of detecting whether the kernel
supports new IFF_ flags.
This patch
2008 Jun 25
3
[PATCH 1/4] tun: Interface to query tun/tap features.
The problem with introducing checksum offload and gso to tun is they
need to set dev->features to enable GSO and/or checksumming, which is
supposed to be done before register_netdevice(), ie. as part of
TUNSETIFF.
Unfortunately, TUNSETIFF has always just ignored flags it doesn't
understand, so there's no good way of detecting whether the kernel
supports new IFF_ flags.
This patch
2008 Jun 25
3
[PATCH 1/4] tun: Interface to query tun/tap features.
The problem with introducing checksum offload and gso to tun is they
need to set dev->features to enable GSO and/or checksumming, which is
supposed to be done before register_netdevice(), ie. as part of
TUNSETIFF.
Unfortunately, TUNSETIFF has always just ignored flags it doesn't
understand, so there's no good way of detecting whether the kernel
supports new IFF_ flags.
This patch
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] Lguest launcher, child starving parent
Glauber noticed long delays between hitting a key, and seeing data come
up on the virtual console. Looking into this, I found that the
wake_parent routine that reads from all devices was actually starving
out the parent after sending the parent a signal to wake up.
The thing is, the child which takes the console input is recognized by
the scheduler as an interactive process. The parent,
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] Lguest launcher, child starving parent
Glauber noticed long delays between hitting a key, and seeing data come
up on the virtual console. Looking into this, I found that the
wake_parent routine that reads from all devices was actually starving
out the parent after sending the parent a signal to wake up.
The thing is, the child which takes the console input is recognized by
the scheduler as an interactive process. The parent,
2009 Apr 03
0
PATCH: Handle virtual entry point in mboot.c32
Hi,
This patch ensures that mboot.c32 will always jump to a physical address
when loading a Multiboot kernel.
Some kernels are linked with a virtual entry point and without this patch
these kernels are unbootable.
Hope this helps,
Matthew
--- a/com32/modules/mboot.c 2009-04-03 09:48:08.000000000 +1000
+++ b/com32/modules/mboot.c 2009-04-03 09:48:16.000000000 +1000
@@ -650,6 +650,13 @@ static
2008 Feb 06
0
[PATCHv2 1/3] x86: use ELF format in compressed images.
This allows other boot loaders such as the Xen domain builder the
opportunity to extract the ELF file.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
---