Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[PATCH 0/9] x86 boot protocol updates"
2007 Jun 15
11
[PATCH 00/10] paravirt/subarchitecture boot protocol
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement
paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel
what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under,
and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code.
Specifically:
- Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the
hardware subarchitecture and some
2007 Jun 15
11
[PATCH 00/10] paravirt/subarchitecture boot protocol
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement
paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel
what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under,
and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code.
Specifically:
- Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the
hardware subarchitecture and some
2007 Jun 15
11
[PATCH 00/10] paravirt/subarchitecture boot protocol
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement
paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel
what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under,
and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code.
Specifically:
- Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the
hardware subarchitecture and some
2007 Jun 06
7
[PATCH RFC 0/7] proposed updates to boot protocol and paravirt booting
This series:
1. Updates the boot protocol to version 2.07
2. Clean up the existing build process, to get rid of tools/build and
make the linker do more heavy lifting
3. Make the bzImage payload an ELF file. The bootloader can extract
this as a naked ELF file by skipping over boot_params.setup_sects worth
of 16-bit setup code.
4. Update the boot_params to 2.07, and update the
2007 Jun 06
7
[PATCH RFC 0/7] proposed updates to boot protocol and paravirt booting
This series:
1. Updates the boot protocol to version 2.07
2. Clean up the existing build process, to get rid of tools/build and
make the linker do more heavy lifting
3. Make the bzImage payload an ELF file. The bootloader can extract
this as a naked ELF file by skipping over boot_params.setup_sects worth
of 16-bit setup code.
4. Update the boot_params to 2.07, and update the
2007 Jun 01
2
another RFC patch: bzImage with ELF payload
OK, here's another go-around. This patch leaves the bzImage itself
unmodified, but it changes the payload into an ELF file. That is, the
32-bit decompression/relocation+compressed kernel is now a properly
formed ELF file.
One thing that fell out of this is that code32_start end up being a
pointer to the ELF header rather than an entrypoint. Rather than
reproducing Vivek's (?) hack of
2007 Jun 01
2
another RFC patch: bzImage with ELF payload
OK, here's another go-around. This patch leaves the bzImage itself
unmodified, but it changes the payload into an ELF file. That is, the
32-bit decompression/relocation+compressed kernel is now a properly
formed ELF file.
One thing that fell out of this is that code32_start end up being a
pointer to the ELF header rather than an entrypoint. Rather than
reproducing Vivek's (?) hack of
2008 Feb 13
4
[PATCHv3 1/3] x86: use ELF format in compressed images.
This allows other boot loaders such as the Xen domain builder the
opportunity to extract the ELF file.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
---
2008 Feb 13
4
[PATCHv3 1/3] x86: use ELF format in compressed images.
This allows other boot loaders such as the Xen domain builder the
opportunity to extract the ELF file.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
---
2007 Apr 18
2
Single PV startup vs multiple PV startup
Hi Rusty,
I had a look over your 011-paravirt-head.S.patch. I'm struggling to
come up with a list of any benefits over having separate entrypoints for
each hypervisor.
Multiple entry pros:
* allows maximum startup flexibility for any given hypervisor
* for Xen at least, it's pretty simple
* the "what hypervisor am I under" question is answered trivially
cons:
2007 May 09
1
lguest re-review
Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send
the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations
about the author's personal appearance, etc.
I'll plan on sending these patches off to Linus in a week's time, assuming
all goes well.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
2007 May 09
1
lguest re-review
Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send
the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations
about the author's personal appearance, etc.
I'll plan on sending these patches off to Linus in a week's time, assuming
all goes well.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
2007 Apr 18
5
[RFC] First (incomplete) cut of Xen paravirt binding
I've updated the patches at
http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/paravirt/?mf=33ba6c4fce13;path=/ to carve out
the basic shape of how I see all this fitting together.
These patches implement an initial set of Xen paravirt ops, as well as
adapting head.S to set up a Xen-specific entrypoint. The head.S code
does absolutely minimal setup, and then calls xen_start_kernel(). This
installs the Xen
2007 Apr 18
15
[PATCH 0 of 13] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It
didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ]
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The
patches should
2007 Apr 18
15
[PATCH 0 of 13] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It
didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ]
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The
patches should
2007 Apr 18
8
[patch 0/8] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
The main change from the last posting is that all the page-table
related patches have been moved out, and will be posted separately.
Also, the off-by-one in reserving the top of address space has been
2007 Apr 18
8
[patch 0/8] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
The main change from the last posting is that all the page-table
related patches have been moved out, and will be posted separately.
Also, the off-by-one in reserving the top of address space has been
2017 Feb 08
3
Linking Linux kernel with LLD
>I have just checked it, the startup.elf and realmode.elf are fine. Only few changes are required for mainline kernel and one >commit has to be reverted from lld and a few patches have to be applied.
>
>The only step when I have used BFD is linking vmlinux. I have manually set LD variable in vmlinux_link() function. The vmlinux >produced by lld doesn't work yet. I will compare
2008 Oct 20
13
[PATCH 00/13] ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization.
This patchset is for more paravirtualization on ia64/pv_ops.
- paravirtualize fsys call (fsys.S) by multi compile
- paravirtualize gate page (gate.S) by multi compile
- support save/restore
For this purpose, the followings needs to be paravirtualized
- ar.itc instruction
- sched_clock()
This is because timer may changed before/after saving/restoring.
For convenience the working full
2008 Oct 20
13
[PATCH 00/13] ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization.
This patchset is for more paravirtualization on ia64/pv_ops.
- paravirtualize fsys call (fsys.S) by multi compile
- paravirtualize gate page (gate.S) by multi compile
- support save/restore
For this purpose, the followings needs to be paravirtualized
- ar.itc instruction
- sched_clock()
This is because timer may changed before/after saving/restoring.
For convenience the working full