Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[PATCH RFC 0/3] Virtio draft II"
2007 Jul 06
6
[RFC 0/4] Using a generic bus_type for virtio
This is a subject that came up in the virtio BOF session
at OLS. I decided to go forward and implement something
that I like, based on the latest virtio proposal at the
time, which was draft III.
It's not a drop-in replacement, because it's missing a
host implementation. I first started my own, which is
not done yet, but wanted to do one for lguest and one
for emulated PCI next. It's
2007 Jul 06
6
[RFC 0/4] Using a generic bus_type for virtio
This is a subject that came up in the virtio BOF session
at OLS. I decided to go forward and implement something
that I like, based on the latest virtio proposal at the
time, which was draft III.
It's not a drop-in replacement, because it's missing a
host implementation. I first started my own, which is
not done yet, but wanted to do one for lguest and one
for emulated PCI next. It's
2007 Jul 03
6
[PATCH 1/3] Virtio draft IV
In response to Avi's excellent analysis, I've updated virtio as promised
(apologies for the delay, travel got in the way).
===
This attempts to implement a "virtual I/O" layer which should allow
common drivers to be efficiently used across most virtual I/O
mechanisms. It will no-doubt need further enhancement.
The details of probing the device are left to hypervisor-specific
2007 Jul 03
6
[PATCH 1/3] Virtio draft IV
In response to Avi's excellent analysis, I've updated virtio as promised
(apologies for the delay, travel got in the way).
===
This attempts to implement a "virtual I/O" layer which should allow
common drivers to be efficiently used across most virtual I/O
mechanisms. It will no-doubt need further enhancement.
The details of probing the device are left to hypervisor-specific
2017 Jan 28
6
make SCSI passthrough support optional
Hi all,
this series builds on my previous changes in Jens' for-4.11/rq-refactor
branch that split out the BLOCK_PC fields from struct request into a new
struct scsi_request, and makes support for struct scsi_request and the
SCSI passthrough ioctls optional. It is now only enabled by drivers that
need it.
In addition I've made SCSI passthrough support in the virtio_blk driver an
optional
2017 Jan 28
6
make SCSI passthrough support optional
Hi all,
this series builds on my previous changes in Jens' for-4.11/rq-refactor
branch that split out the BLOCK_PC fields from struct request into a new
struct scsi_request, and makes support for struct scsi_request and the
SCSI passthrough ioctls optional. It is now only enabled by drivers that
need it.
In addition I've made SCSI passthrough support in the virtio_blk driver an
optional
2013 Feb 19
24
[PATCH 00/16] virtio ring rework.
OK, this is (ab)uses some of Paolo's patches. The first 7 are
candidates for this merge window (maybe), the rest I'm not so sure
about.
Thanks,
Rusty.
Paolo Bonzini (3):
scatterlist: introduce sg_unmark_end
virtio-blk: reorganize virtblk_add_req
virtio-blk: use virtqueue_add_sgs on req path
Rusty Russell (13):
virtio_ring: virtqueue_add_sgs, to add multiple sgs.
virtio-blk:
2013 Feb 19
24
[PATCH 00/16] virtio ring rework.
OK, this is (ab)uses some of Paolo's patches. The first 7 are
candidates for this merge window (maybe), the rest I'm not so sure
about.
Thanks,
Rusty.
Paolo Bonzini (3):
scatterlist: introduce sg_unmark_end
virtio-blk: reorganize virtblk_add_req
virtio-blk: use virtqueue_add_sgs on req path
Rusty Russell (13):
virtio_ring: virtqueue_add_sgs, to add multiple sgs.
virtio-blk:
2012 Aug 07
4
[PATCH V6 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, all
This version reworked on REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by
Christoph and dropped the block core bits since Jens has picked them up.
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16%
Latency improvement: 32%,
2012 Aug 07
4
[PATCH V6 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, all
This version reworked on REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by
Christoph and dropped the block core bits since Jens has picked them up.
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16%
Latency improvement: 32%,
2012 Aug 08
2
[PATCH V7 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, all
Changes in v7:
- Using vbr->flags to trace request type
- Dropped unnecessary struct virtio_blk *vblk parameter
- Reuse struct virtblk_req in bio done function
- Added performance data on normal SATA device and the reason why make it optional
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential
2012 Aug 08
2
[PATCH V7 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, all
Changes in v7:
- Using vbr->flags to trace request type
- Dropped unnecessary struct virtio_blk *vblk parameter
- Reuse struct virtblk_req in bio done function
- Added performance data on normal SATA device and the reason why make it optional
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential
2012 Jul 28
1
[PATCH V4 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, Jens & Rusty
This version is rebased against linux-next which resolves the conflict with
Paolo Bonzini's 'virtio-blk: allow toggling host cache between writeback and
writethrough' patch.
Patch 1/3 and 2/3 applies on linus's master as well. Since Rusty will pick up
patch 3/3 so the changes to block core (adding blk_bio_map_sg()) will have a
user.
Jens, could you please
2012 Jul 28
1
[PATCH V4 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, Jens & Rusty
This version is rebased against linux-next which resolves the conflict with
Paolo Bonzini's 'virtio-blk: allow toggling host cache between writeback and
writethrough' patch.
Patch 1/3 and 2/3 applies on linus's master as well. Since Rusty will pick up
patch 3/3 so the changes to block core (adding blk_bio_map_sg()) will have a
user.
Jens, could you please
2013 Feb 12
12
[PATCH 0/9] virtio: new API for addition of buffers, scatterlist changes
Most device drivers do not need to perform any postprocessing on the
scatterlists they receive from higher-level drivers (e.g. the block
or SCSI layer), because they translate the request metadata directly
from the various C structs into the data that is required by the device.
virtio devices however do this translation in two steps: a device-specific
step in the device driver, and generic
2013 Feb 12
12
[PATCH 0/9] virtio: new API for addition of buffers, scatterlist changes
Most device drivers do not need to perform any postprocessing on the
scatterlists they receive from higher-level drivers (e.g. the block
or SCSI layer), because they translate the request metadata directly
from the various C structs into the data that is required by the device.
virtio devices however do this translation in two steps: a device-specific
step in the device driver, and generic
2012 Jun 13
4
[PATCH RFC 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve
performance.
Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively.
Asias He (2):
block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper
virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
block/blk-merge.c | 63 ++++++++++++++
2012 Jun 13
4
[PATCH RFC 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve
performance.
Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively.
Asias He (2):
block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper
virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
block/blk-merge.c | 63 ++++++++++++++
2019 Dec 12
4
[PATCH] virtio-blk: remove VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI support
Since the need for a special flag to support SCSI passthrough on a
block device was added in May 2017 the SCSI passthrough support in
virtio-blk has been disabled. It has always been a bad idea
(just ask the original author..) and we have virtio-scsi for proper
passthrough. The feature also never made it into the virtio 1.0
or later specifications.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at
2012 Jun 18
13
[PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve
performance.
Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively.
Asias He (3):
block: Introduce __blk_segment_map_sg() helper
block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper
virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk