Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Réf. : Re: [PATCH 0/4] Virtual Machine Time Accounting"
2007 Aug 20
4
[PATCH 0/4] Virtual Machine Time Accounting
The aim of these four patches is to introduce Virtual Machine time accounting.
_Ingo_, as these patches modify files of the scheduler, could you have a look to
them, please ?
[PATCH 1/4] as recent CPUs introduce a third running state, after "user" and
"system", we need a new field, "guest", in cpustat to store the time used by
the CPU to run virtual CPU. Modify
2007 Aug 20
4
[PATCH 0/4] Virtual Machine Time Accounting
The aim of these four patches is to introduce Virtual Machine time accounting.
_Ingo_, as these patches modify files of the scheduler, could you have a look to
them, please ?
[PATCH 1/4] as recent CPUs introduce a third running state, after "user" and
"system", we need a new field, "guest", in cpustat to store the time used by
the CPU to run virtual CPU. Modify
2008 Mar 18
3
[PATCH 0/3 - resend] kvmclock reboot
Avi,
Hope this series is okay now.
Thanks for the testing
2006 Jan 04
2
[PATCH] Fix leak in blkback initialization
In case of failing due to lack of memory in the system, blkif_init
potentially leaves a leak if some of the allocations was sucessfully
suceeded.
This patch frees the memory allocated, avoiding the leak.
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@br.ibm.com>
--
glommer
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2008 Jan 18
6
[PATCH 0/10] Tree fixes for PARAVIRT
Hi,
This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal
to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just
some more small steps are needed.
The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually
preventing the whole tree from booting.
2008 Jan 18
6
[PATCH 0/10] Tree fixes for PARAVIRT
Hi,
This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal
to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just
some more small steps are needed.
The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually
preventing the whole tree from booting.
2003 Jun 05
0
Réf. : Samba & Sage Line 50 Accounting
Hi,
I think that is a oplock problem.
disable oplock in your share.
-----------------------------------
St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be
Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467
2007 Aug 08
19
Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
Hi folks,
After some time away from it, and a big rebase as a consequence, here is
the updated version of paravirt_ops for x86_64, heading to inclusion.
Your criticism is of course, very welcome.
Have fun
--
arch/x86_64/Kconfig | 11
arch/x86_64/ia32/syscall32.c | 2
arch/x86_64/kernel/Makefile | 1
arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c | 2
2007 Aug 08
19
Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
Hi folks,
After some time away from it, and a big rebase as a consequence, here is
the updated version of paravirt_ops for x86_64, heading to inclusion.
Your criticism is of course, very welcome.
Have fun
--
arch/x86_64/Kconfig | 11
arch/x86_64/ia32/syscall32.c | 2
arch/x86_64/kernel/Makefile | 1
arch/x86_64/kernel/apic.c | 2
2007 Aug 13
1
[kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting
Laurent Vivier wrote:
> The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
> machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to do that.
>
> [PATCH 1/2] introduce a new field, "guest", in cpustat to store the time used by
> the CPU to run virtual CPU. Modify /proc/stat to display this new field.
>
> [PATCH 2/2]
2007 Aug 13
1
[kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting
Laurent Vivier wrote:
> The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
> machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to do that.
>
> [PATCH 1/2] introduce a new field, "guest", in cpustat to store the time used by
> the CPU to run virtual CPU. Modify /proc/stat to display this new field.
>
> [PATCH 2/2]
2008 Feb 11
3
[PATCH 1/5] Change vsmp compile dependency
Change Makefile so vsmp_64.o object is dependent
on PARAVIRT, rather than X86_VSMP
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@scalemp.com>
Acked-by: Shai Fultheim <shai@scalemp.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
2007 Dec 18
3
[PATCH] finish processor.h integration
What's left in processor_32.h and processor_64.h cannot be cleanly
integrated. However, it's just a couple of definitions. They are moved
to processor.h around ifdefs, and the original files are deleted. Note that
there's much less headers included in the final version.
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
---
include/asm-x86/processor.h | 140
2007 Dec 18
3
[PATCH] finish processor.h integration
What's left in processor_32.h and processor_64.h cannot be cleanly
integrated. However, it's just a couple of definitions. They are moved
to processor.h around ifdefs, and the original files are deleted. Note that
there's much less headers included in the final version.
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
---
include/asm-x86/processor.h | 140
2004 Mar 26
1
Réf. : add machine script wont add Postfix account
Hi!
I have the same problem with my PDC.
Work fine:
Modify the script for add samba attribute ( three lines)
Execute manually the entry (with smbldap-useradd.pl -w machine1)
Try to join the domain
Don't work :
Samba call the smbldap-useradd -w %u and the script is not modified.
I use samba 3.0.2a RH 8.0 openldap 2.1.25
-----------------------------------
St?phane PURNELLE
2019 Nov 06
0
[PATCH] virtio_console: allocate inbufs in add_port() only if it is needed
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:02:25PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> On 06/11/2019 14:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 06:47:18PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> >> When we hot unplug a virtserialport and then try to hot plug again,
> >> it fails:
> >>
> >> (qemu) chardev-add socket,id=serial0,path=/tmp/serial0,server,nowait
>
2007 Aug 20
0
[PATCH 3/4] modify account_system_time() to update guest time in cpustat and task_struct
[PATCH 3/4] modify account_system_time() to add cputime to cpustat->guest i=
f we
are running a VCPU. We add this cputime to cpustat->user instead of
cpustat->system because this part of KVM code is in fact user code although=
it
is executed in the kernel. We duplicate VCPU time between guest and user to
allow an unmodified "top(1)" to display correct value. A modified
2007 Aug 20
0
[PATCH 3/4] modify account_system_time() to update guest time in cpustat and task_struct
[PATCH 3/4] modify account_system_time() to add cputime to cpustat->guest i=
f we
are running a VCPU. We add this cputime to cpustat->user instead of
cpustat->system because this part of KVM code is in fact user code although=
it
is executed in the kernel. We duplicate VCPU time between guest and user to
allow an unmodified "top(1)" to display correct value. A modified
2007 Aug 20
3
[PATCH 2/4] Introduce a new fields "gtime" and "cgtime" in task_struct and signal_struct
[PATCH 2/4] like for cpustat, introduce the "gtime" (guest time of the task=
) and
"cgtime" (guest time of the task children) fields for the
tasks. Modify signal_struct and task_struct. Modify /proc/<pid>/stat to dis=
play
these new fields.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>
-- =
------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net --------------
2007 Aug 20
3
[PATCH 2/4] Introduce a new fields "gtime" and "cgtime" in task_struct and signal_struct
[PATCH 2/4] like for cpustat, introduce the "gtime" (guest time of the task=
) and
"cgtime" (guest time of the task children) fields for the
tasks. Modify signal_struct and task_struct. Modify /proc/<pid>/stat to dis=
play
these new fields.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>
-- =
------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net --------------