similar to: LDAP + SSSD + Winbind group membership updating

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "LDAP + SSSD + Winbind group membership updating"

2008 Dec 25
1
Nested Groups
Hi all, I'm not able to create localgroups as described in "docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html" I have tested Samba 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 on Debian lenny. As usual I am using openldap as backend. First I have tested with smbldap-tools, then I have switched to ldapsam:editposix = yes ldapsam:trusted = yes and removed all the script entries from smb.conf.
2014 Aug 27
2
sssd with ad backend and "ldap_id_mapping = false" refuse to start
Hello, we are using sssd version 1.12 on openSUSE 13.1 with Sernet-Samba Packages 4.1.11. Samba runs as a single AD DC We have removed the complete openSUSE samba stuff before testing. sssd runs on the same machine as samba. Our sssd config: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [sssd] services = nss, pam config_file_version = 2 domains =
2003 Jul 31
1
Réf. : groupmember list fails with 3.0.0b3 and LDAP
Hi, Same problem for me, any clue ? Gana?l. owen@isrl.uiuc.edu@lists.samba.org on 07/31/2003 01:42:21 AM Envoy? par : samba-bounces+ganael.laplanche=edf.fr@lists.samba.org Pour : samba@lists.samba.org cc : Objet : [Samba] groupmember list fails with 3.0.0b3 and LDAP Hi all, I've been working on a PDC with group mapping with Samba-3.0.0Beta3 with OpenLDAP-2.1.22. Things
2008 Nov 05
1
Samba 3.2.4 not locking accounts?
Hello guys! I'm using samba 3.2.4 (binaries from samba.org) on SLES9+sp3. I am building a PDC with LDAP support (i am attaching my config files), I'm also using ldapsam:trusted and ldapsam:editposix. Although I am setting the account lock after 3 failed tries in usrmgr, and verified that the parameters are actually set in the LDAP, no locking occurs. I started thinking that it was my
2025 May 16
1
LDAP + SSSD + Winbind group membership updating
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:41:27 +0300 Alex Moz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I broke my head trying to solve the LDAP group membership updating > issue. I need help. > > ###### Description > I've configured OpenLDAP + SSSD + Winbind + Samba 4.21.5 on Fedora 41. Why ? Why not use AD ? Are you aware that sssd and winbind do much the same thing ? What is
2011 Feb 19
0
Samba ACLs and NFS ACLs:Differing results
I have two users on my network, Mary and Bob, who work together in a shared share. They both belong to the group Accounting. Bob is a savvy Linux user who accesses the share via NFS4. Mary toils away using Windows accessing the share via the Samba server. Mary will create a directory on the share and dump a number of files in which Bob and Mary will split the load. Bob, being a LInux user, will
2003 Nov 14
1
net group question
I groupapped the domadmins group in linux to ntgroup="Domain Admins" but instead of mapping to the SID number ending in 512 it's creating a new SID number endind in 2025 mapped to domadmins... Does anybody knows why??? It worked in the previous server. This is the command I execute net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=domadmin If I use the rid=512 option I
2010 Jun 30
0
Samba groups membership
Hi all: I was running Samba 3.0.x (from CentOS 5 repository) integrated with OpenLDAP as a complete PDC solution that worked fine for several moths. As we needed to join Win7 computers to the domain I upgraded to Samba 3.5.3 keeping my Samba configuration the same. We find that after this upgrade the root account of the domain wasn't able to access to C$, D$ or other administrative resources
2005 Nov 21
1
does a pdc need to be in the domain itself?
Hello List, we have installed samba Version 3.0.20-0.1-SUSE. when I'm entering > net getlocalsid I get > SID for domain <netbios name> is: S-1-5-21-4166838278-3756557259-2095403906 entering > net getlocalsid <domain name> returns > SID for domain <domain name> is: S-1-5-21-2018781741-1218799122-1862565094 Does this mean that the pdc itself is not in the domain
2005 Nov 24
1
Group mapping: different SIDs
Hi, I have the following situation concerning group mapping: when I enter > net getlocalsid I get > SID for domain PDC is: S-1-5-21-4166838278-3756557259-2095403906 when I enter > net getlocalsid DOMAIN I get >SID for domain DOMAIN is: S-1-5-21-2018781741-1218799122-1862565094 The group mapping shows > net groupmap list > Domain Users
2004 Apr 17
1
Bug in "force group" parameter, or group membership checking?
Hello, I have the following situation: Samba with ldap passdb backend. In my setup I have a group called exact: ------------ dn: cn=exact,ou=Groups,dc=ahm,dc=nl objectClass: posixGroup,sambaGroupMapping cn: exact gidNumber: 1000 sambaSID: S-1-5-21-4269728302-1655870493-3894479995-3001 sambaGroupType: 4 memberUid: gerrit,piet,hornie ------------ maps to the unix group exact: exact
2011 Sep 13
0
Win7 to Samba Domain Printing Strangeness
Hi, I have a server which until recently was serving a domain of about 20 XP PCs in a school. Over the summer I updated Samba to 3.5.4-0.70, and replaced the desktops with new machines which are running Win7 Pro 64 bit SP1. This being a school, I have a system of mandatory group profiles set up, and all of the pupil groups curently have copies of the same mandatory profile (generated via the
2004 Mar 24
1
members server cant find bdc for logon service
Dear List, we've the following setup: login: PDC (Samba + Master LDAP with Slave LDAP) appserver: BDC (Samba + Master LDAP with Slave LDAP) fileserver: Samba domain member server Everything is running with Samba3 and OpenLDAP2 The following problem: when the PDC is not available (test shutdown) the clients can log into the domain (netlogon- script is running from BDC), but the fileserver
2004 Oct 12
3
Group membership
I am using Samba PDC with OpenLDAP2 and smbldap-tools. As part of my logon.bat, I call a script called ifmember.exe. This script can list out the groups a user is a member of. It is reporting that my root user is a member of the group 'engr.' I don't know if this is a bug with ifmember.exe or if it's an issue in Samba or in LDAP. Here is some relevant data:
2009 Nov 04
0
Problems with tdb-database after migration from Debian-Samba-3.2.5-4lenny6 to Samba-3.2.5-4lenny7
Hi there ... I have a problem with my tdb-database after I've migrated from Debian-Samba-3.2.5-4lenny6 to Samba-3.2.5-4lenny7. All the old directories /etc/samba with the smb.conf and /var/lib/samba with the tdb-database has been hold. Now I've inexplicable effects with my tdb-database. - I cannot list my admin - user, which is the domain-administrator, in my passwd.tdb. - I cannot
2006 Mar 08
0
Checking effective group membership - Linux side
First off, on the Windows side I use "ifmember.exe /list" to check the group membership in affect for the currently logged in domain user, works like a charm. However, Linux side is another story, specifically the net command. We have, among others, the following mapping in place: net groupmap modify ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=domadmin Based on this documentation:
2003 Jul 15
0
ntconfig.pol policies for groups
Hi! I have a problem using ntconfig.pol-policies for domain groups other than "Domain Users" and "Domain Admins". I am using Samba 2.2.7 with LDAP support as a PDC. Policies work as expected for "Domain Users" and "Domain Admins" but setting policies for any other group doesn't work. The "Browse"-list for AddGroups in poledit only shows
2004 May 13
0
Cannot set a "Domain group" membership with ldapSAM
Hello everybody! I should have an error on the LDAP entries of my ldapSAM, but I've read several times chapters 11 & 12 of the Samba HOWTO Collection and I cannot fix it. Let's explain: I've got a StandAlone fileserver (not PDC) samba-3.0.4 with ldapSAM working on a RedHat Enterprise 3.0 (linux kernel 2.4.25). The directory server version shouldn't be important, but
2005 May 13
2
losing access to profile when user becomes domain user instead domain admin
Hi, I am in the process of migrating our windows workstations to a samba domain. Here is the problem: When creating the domain user I put every user additionalyy in the domain admin group so that he/she can copy his old files on the local profile to his new domain account. Then after this is done I put them to the domain users group but some (!) of the user the lose then access to the
2011 Jun 09
3
DFS root only works for more recent Windows clients
I've been testing DFS roots and I'm finding that while Vista and 2008 Server clients can connect with no problems, Windows XP Pro and 2003 Server clients fail. This seems like it's the wrong way round - Samba usually has more difficulties with recent Windows versions than older ones - but I can only assume that there's some registry/policy change between the versions. If anybody