similar to: Proposal to raise ML digest threshold

Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > Are there many digest subscribers currently active? WDYT about raising the > size threshold significantly (500K? more?) or abolishing it and just going > for one digest per day? > > I guess the setting is there to make heated discussions (much traffic) > visible faster. I suppose it does not impact

Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > Are there many digest subscribers currently active? WDYT about raising the > size threshold significantly (500K? more?) or abolishing it and just going > for one digest per day? > > I guess the setting is there to make heated discussions (much traffic) > visible faster. I suppose it does not impact

Hello, I've updated sources but forgot to recreate configure so I've ended without #define HAVE_EVP_RIPEMD160 1 and ssh client ended with: OpenSSH_6.7p1, OpenSSL 1.0.1h-fips 5 Jun 2014 debug1: Reading configuration data ssh.config main: mux digest failed The problem was that ssh_digest_by_alg() couldn't verify alg with an index bigger than 1 since the line with SSH_DIGEST_RIPEMD160

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: > +Alex Bradbury > > Sounds to me like we have no known users still on VS 2012. > > So, how about we plan to move forward again with Chandler’s proposal for making this transition. For those who don’t want to dig through to the beginning here’s the basic plan: > > 1) Loop in cfe-dev and

Timo, Wonder if you can tweak the digests to hold more messages? In 5 hours this morning, I've received 6 digests, seems a little excessive to me. -- Kenny Dail <kend at amigo.net>

I keep recieving multiple digests per day. Need to find out if there is a way to limit the number digests that are being sent to me. Tried contacting the list administrator, but I have not recieved a response. Does anyone have a alternate email for him...??? -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm

On Thursday 03 May 2007 22:00, centos-request at centos.org wrote: > --- Ioannis Vranos <ivranos at freemail.gr> wrote: > > > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > > > > > That number is only for splitting off digests if that number is reached > > > before the *daily* archive gets out. As I already said: This number can > > > be changed as it really

+Alex Bradbury Sounds to me like we have no known users still on VS 2012. So, how about we plan to move forward again with Chandler’s proposal for making this transition. For those who don’t want to dig through to the beginning here’s the basic plan: 1) Loop in cfe-dev and lldb-dev (Done!) 2) Wait until this email fully circulates in digests and LLVM Weekly so that everyone who has an objection

Hi, does it true every CentOS mailing list subscriber gets a digests from CentOS-announce mailing list? I get digest from CentOS-announce, but I subscribe announce (i386) for other email address. Regards -- Dominik

Hello Speex list members, The Speex Project is moving into space here on Xiph.Org's servers, and among other things, we're taking over running the mailing list. The new address for Speex mail is 'speex-dev@xiph.org'. All the members of the current list are already added to the new speex-dev list. An online searchable mailing list archive is at http://www.xiph.org/archives/speex/

Starting a new thread to loop in cfe-dev and lldb-dev. For those not following along there has been a thread on llvm-dev about moving the minimum required Visual Studio version to 2013. The motivating reason is this will allow us to take advantage of a bunch of C++11 features that are not supported by MSVC 2012. According to MSDN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx) the list is:

AFAIK there is no hashing utility in base R which can create hash digests of arbitrary R objects. However, as also described by Henrik Bengtsson in [1], we have tools::md5sum() which calculates MD5 hashes of files. Calculating hashes of in-memory objects is a very common task in several areas, as demonstrated by the popularity of the 'digest' package (~850.000 downloads/month). Upon

Great, thanks! Also just for context, this sounded reminiscent of one of the first NUT drivers, `genericups` (for simple contact-closure support, with IIRC serial-port connections rather than GPIO). Nearby there's also a `generic_modbus" name. Wondering if the new driver should be (similar to) `generic_gpio`. @Community verdict: Then there was also an effort some years ago to name

Just monkey patched Sprockets in our Rails 3.2.9 app to override the Cache-Control header for html assets that we need to tweak more often in development, but that we don''t want to use digests/fingerprinting with: # Sprockets 2.x patch if Rails.env.development? module Sprockets module Server private alias_method :sprockets_headers, :headers def headers(env,

Do MD5 digests exist somewhere for the source packages? If not, is there some other way to verify the integrity of the files we've downloaded? Thanks. -- Stuart Luppescu -=- s-luppescu at uchicago.edu University of Chicago -=- CCSR $B:MJ8$HCRF`H~$NIc(B -=- Kernel 2.4.19-xfs-r1 There *is* no such thing as a civil engineer. -------------- next part

FWIW, there is precedent with libusb{1,0}, libshut and libhid which abstract NUT operations from a "backend lib" to build against; similar for serial.c used by many drivers. Take care to not conflict by filenames with "real" third-party libs used by the build - especially to avoid mixups for headers and in docs/discussion. Jim On Thu, Feb 23, 2023, 22:16 MODRIS B?RZONIS

Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > Nearby there's also a `generic_modbus" name. Wondering if the new driver > should be (similar to) `generic_gpio`. sound good. It would be nice if there were an abstraction layer for various GPIO access methods, rather than hard-coding linux, even if there is only one implementation of the

On 2/12/19 10:55 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > DNSSEC keys do not expire. Signatures do expire. How long a signature > is good for depends upon the software generating the signature, some > lets you specify. ldns I believe defaults to 60 days but I am not sure. > > The keys are in DNSSKEY records that are signed by your Key Signing > Key and must be resigning before the signature

Did refactoring to better split library specifics, now see open/close/read lines that any library should support. Need to split into 2 files, may to go for library? On 2/22/23 20:17, Greg Troxel wrote: > Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > >> Nearby there's also a `generic_modbus" name. Wondering if the new driver >>

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:29:00 -0500 (EST), Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 at duke.edu> wrote: > I'm sorry, but making decisions based on Stupid User Tricks is about > the worst policy I can imagine. That way lies madness. No, where lies madness is in the self-centred way in which some people make demands of others to alter innocuous behaviour so that the data requirements of