similar to: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

>>> On 02.03.12 at 10:04, EMEA1.EMEA1-MH.GATEWAY wrote: > The message that you sent was undeliverable to the following: > > jake.wires@citrix.com (550 #5.1.0 Address rejected jake.wires@citrix.com) > daniel.stodden@citrix.com (550 #5.1.0 Address rejected daniel.stodden@citrix.com) > Who is considered the maintainer(s) of blktap2 code these days? Jan

On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:30:34 +0800 (CST) yang.yang29 at zte.com.cn wrote: > From: xu xin <xu.xin16 at zte.com.cn> > > This creates six drop reasons as follows, which will help users know the > specific reason why bridge drops the packets when forwarding. > > 1) SKB_DROP_REASON_BRIDGE_FWD_NO_BACKUP_PORT: failed to get a backup > port link when the destination port is

And apparently the original poster had bad headers. Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: ml.afb at mailbox.org Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain mailbox.org by mx2.mailbox.org. [80.241.60.215]. The error that the other server returned was: 577 5.1.1 <ml.afb at

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.44 Severity: minor Tags: patch Please change the following line in violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix: -^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtp\[[0-9]+\]: [[:upper:]0-9]+: to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9.]{7,15}\], delay=[0-9]+, status=(deferred|bounced) \(host [._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9.]{7,15}\] said: [45][0-9][0-9] .* \(in

From: xu xin <xu.xin16 at zte.com.cn> This creates six drop reasons as follows, which will help users know the specific reason why bridge drops the packets when forwarding. 1) SKB_DROP_REASON_BRIDGE_FWD_NO_BACKUP_PORT: failed to get a backup port link when the destination port is down. 2) SKB_DROP_REASON_BRIDGE_FWD_SAME_PORT: destination port is the same with originating port when

Returned mail: User unknown Hi List; I keep getting emails similar to the text below. I/We own the domain dataintellect.com and we have email addresses setup however I always see a bogus dataintellect.com email address as the sender. -or is this simply a random spam email? Thanks in advance for any advice... ========================================= From: Mail Delivery Subsystem

Hi, Is it possible to have a static user database along with an LDAP password database and *not* be forced to set "allow_all_users=yes" for the userdb? The wiki page on static user database says "Normally static userdb handles this by doing a passdb lookup instead." How should the passdb behave in order for this to work? In my tests (on a test server) I am using

The original message was received at Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:26:47 -0400 (EDT) from mail.shf.org.za [209.212.112.50] *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----". The reason your mail is being

Hi Guys, I've already posted this to the postfix mailing list and they made sure the error as the title suggest was generated by dovecot and not the other way around. I have an almost perfectly working multi domain mail server running dovecot+postfix+mysql+postfixadmin behind pfsense, when we transferred office, issues arose, suddenly users using email clients like thunderbird/outlook

Hello, ive tried to send letters to samba list few times and every time i get a mail back with an error "Message status - undeliverable" from Mailer-Daemon at mthelen7.ballarat.edu.au. The contents of the letter is following: The message that you sent was undeliverable to the following: Mdelves (User account is expired) So i'm sending this test message to make sure my letters

The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of delivering mail to my test box. When I send a message to either a valid or relayed user at my remote machine's address, it never gets there. I know this virtually for sure because I'm tailing /var/log/maillog and nothing new has been added for the past hour. I'm thinking eventually my ISP will send the message back to me

> Someone on this list uses the address @sedwards.com > > I doubt this is their actual email address as there is no MX record for > sedwards.com and I can't find registration for their domain either. > > Part of my mail servers reject these emails because they cannot be > replied to, or are likely to be spam. > > Every so often I get a mail from the list

This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields: Return-path: <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org> Received: from ims-ms-daemon.msg1s.netvision.net.il by msg1s.netvision.net.il (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) id <0HVW000SZM2M5K at msg1s.netvision.net.il> (original mail from openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org); Fri, 9

On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 22:02:29 +0200, you wrote: >Am Dienstag, den 16.06.2015, 11:44 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura: >> The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of >> delivering mail to my test box. When I send a message to either a >> valid or relayed user at my remote machine's address, it never gets >> there. I know this virtually for sure

i have a similar(ish) questionm tho i admit it may be slightly OT coz I'm trying to do it with otto...any idea how to script (and here i guess i AM asking 'how do i automate this with otto' rather than 'is there anyway to do it with icecast') semiregular ads/news itesm/bulletins into an otto playlist? even something as simple as cronning an insert of a news item into the

Your message was refused by recipient's server filtering program. Reason given was as follows: Mensagem bloqueada por suspeita de v?rus. Verifique se a mensagem cont?m anexos com a extens?o *.pif -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/rfc822-headers Size: 523 bytes Desc: not available Url :

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. rh at dpaschoal.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Subject: Failed (rh at dpaschoal.com.br) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:08:50 -0300 Size: 1973 Url:

- These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server: renato-costa.vieira-pinto at serpro.gov.br; Failed; 5.3.0 (other or undefined mail system status) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: unknown sender Subject: no subject Date: no date Size: 143 Url:

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. clodo at iae-sp.br -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Subject: Error (clodo at iae-sp.br) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:48:18 -0300 Size: 1167 Url:

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. diego.silva at cpm.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Subject: Re: Nossas contas leia! Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 01:42:10 -0300 Size: 7663 Url: