similar to: [PATCH 0/7] (Re-)introducing pvops for x86_64 - Consolidation part

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH 0/7] (Re-)introducing pvops for x86_64 - Consolidation part"

2007 Apr 28
3
huh startup_ipi_hook?
The current paravirt startup_ipi hook for vmware commit: ae5da273fe3352febd38658d8d34484cbcfb3423 is quite frankly ridiculous. In the middle of wake_up_secondary_cpu: We have: /* * Paravirt / VMI wants a startup IPI hook here to set up the * target processor state. */ startup_ipi_hook(phys_apicid, (unsigned long) start_secondary, (unsigned
2007 Apr 28
3
huh startup_ipi_hook?
The current paravirt startup_ipi hook for vmware commit: ae5da273fe3352febd38658d8d34484cbcfb3423 is quite frankly ridiculous. In the middle of wake_up_secondary_cpu: We have: /* * Paravirt / VMI wants a startup IPI hook here to set up the * target processor state. */ startup_ipi_hook(phys_apicid, (unsigned long) start_secondary, (unsigned
2007 Apr 28
3
[PATCH] i386: introduce voyager smp_ops, fix voyager build
This adds an smp_ops for voyager, and hooks things up appropriately. This is the first baby-step to making subarch runtime switchable. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> --- arch/i386/kernel/Makefile | 1 arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
2007 Apr 28
3
[PATCH] i386: introduce voyager smp_ops, fix voyager build
This adds an smp_ops for voyager, and hooks things up appropriately. This is the first baby-step to making subarch runtime switchable. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> --- arch/i386/kernel/Makefile | 1 arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
2011 Sep 01
3
HVM guests and pvlocks not working as expected
After much joy with this, I thought I post this to a bigger audience. After having migrated to Xen 4.1.1, booting HVM guests had several issues. Some related to interrupts not being set up correctly (which Stefano has posted patches) and even with those 3.0 guests seem to hang for me while 2.6.38 or older kernels were ok. After digging deeply into this, I think I found the issue. However, if that
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] Add smp_ops interface
Add a smp_ops interface. This abstracts the API defined by <linux/smp.h> for use within arch/i386. The primary intent is that it be used by a paravirtualizing hypervisor to implement SMP, but it could also be used by non-APIC-using sub-architectures. This is related to CONFIG_PARAVIRT, but is implemented unconditionally since it is simpler that way and not a highly performance-sensitive
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] Add smp_ops interface
Add a smp_ops interface. This abstracts the API defined by <linux/smp.h> for use within arch/i386. The primary intent is that it be used by a paravirtualizing hypervisor to implement SMP, but it could also be used by non-APIC-using sub-architectures. This is related to CONFIG_PARAVIRT, but is implemented unconditionally since it is simpler that way and not a highly performance-sensitive
2007 Dec 20
6
[PATCH 0/15] adjust pvops to accomodate its x86_64 variant
Hi folks, With this series, the bulk of the work of pvops64 is done. Here, I integrate most of the paravirt.c and paravirt.h files, making them applicable to both architectures. CONFIG_PARAVIRT is _not_ present yet. Basically, this code is missing page table integration (patches currently being worked on by Jeremy). Enjoy
2007 Dec 20
6
[PATCH 0/15] adjust pvops to accomodate its x86_64 variant
Hi folks, With this series, the bulk of the work of pvops64 is done. Here, I integrate most of the paravirt.c and paravirt.h files, making them applicable to both architectures. CONFIG_PARAVIRT is _not_ present yet. Basically, this code is missing page table integration (patches currently being worked on by Jeremy). Enjoy
2009 Nov 18
5
[PATCH 0/3] Split up pv-ops
Paravirt ops is currently only capable of either replacing a lot of Linux internal code or none at all. The are users that don't need all of the possibilities pv-ops delivers though. On KVM for example we're perfectly fine not using the PV MMU, thus not touching any MMU code. That way we don't have to improve pv-ops to become fast, we just don't compile the MMU parts in! This
2009 Nov 18
5
[PATCH 0/3] Split up pv-ops
Paravirt ops is currently only capable of either replacing a lot of Linux internal code or none at all. The are users that don't need all of the possibilities pv-ops delivers though. On KVM for example we're perfectly fine not using the PV MMU, thus not touching any MMU code. That way we don't have to improve pv-ops to become fast, we just don't compile the MMU parts in! This
2008 Jan 18
6
[PATCH 0/10] Tree fixes for PARAVIRT
Hi, This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just some more small steps are needed. The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually preventing the whole tree from booting.
2008 Jan 18
6
[PATCH 0/10] Tree fixes for PARAVIRT
Hi, This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just some more small steps are needed. The first fix is not even specific for PARAVIRT, and it's actually preventing the whole tree from booting.
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation
smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete duplicates of the same logic. This patch combines them by implementing them in terms of the more general smp_call_function_mask(). [ Jan, Andi: This only changes arch/i386; can x86_64 be changed in the same way? ] [ Rebased onto Jan's x86_64-mm-consolidate-smp_send_stop patch ] Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation
smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete duplicates of the same logic. This patch combines them by implementing them in terms of the more general smp_call_function_mask(). [ Jan, Andi: This only changes arch/i386; can x86_64 be changed in the same way? ] [ Rebased onto Jan's x86_64-mm-consolidate-smp_send_stop patch ] Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011 Jan 17
8
[PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule()
For future rework of try_to_wake_up() we'd like to push part of that onto the CPU the task is actually going to run on, in order to do so we need a generic callback from the existing scheduler IPI. This patch introduces such a generic callback: scheduler_ipi() and implements it as a NOP. I visited existing smp_send_reschedule() implementations and tried to add a call to scheduler_ipi() in
2011 Jan 17
8
[PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule()
For future rework of try_to_wake_up() we'd like to push part of that onto the CPU the task is actually going to run on, in order to do so we need a generic callback from the existing scheduler IPI. This patch introduces such a generic callback: scheduler_ipi() and implements it as a NOP. I visited existing smp_send_reschedule() implementations and tried to add a call to scheduler_ipi() in
2011 Jan 17
8
[PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule()
For future rework of try_to_wake_up() we'd like to push part of that onto the CPU the task is actually going to run on, in order to do so we need a generic callback from the existing scheduler IPI. This patch introduces such a generic callback: scheduler_ipi() and implements it as a NOP. I visited existing smp_send_reschedule() implementations and tried to add a call to scheduler_ipi() in
2007 Apr 18
34
[patch 00/34] Xen-pv_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP and SMP guest support (NEW!) * dynamic ticks (NEW!) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes (non-PAE may be broken at the moment) * xen hvc console
2007 Apr 18
34
[patch 00/34] Xen-pv_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP and SMP guest support (NEW!) * dynamic ticks (NEW!) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes (non-PAE may be broken at the moment) * xen hvc console