similar to: missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed with R ipolygrowth

Hi, I think you're misunderstanding which set of variables go on either side of the formula. Is this what you're looking for? > aggregate(OD ~ Time + Target + Conc, data = df, FUN = "mean") Time Target Conc OD 1 1 BACT 1 765.3333 2 1 BACT 2 745.3333 3 1 BACT 3 675.0000 > aggregate(ODnorm ~ Time + Target + Conc, data = df, FUN =

Hello, I have a data frame with different groups (Time, Target, Conc) and each entry has a triplicate value of the measurements OD and ODnorm. How can I merge the triplicates into a single mean value? I tried the following: ``` df = data.frame(Time=rep(1, 9), Well=paste("A", 1:9, sep=""), OD=c(666, 815, 815, 702, 739, 795, 657, 705, 663),

Also, > aggregate(cbind(OD, ODnorm) ~ Time + Target + Conc, data = df, FUN = "mean") Time Target Conc OD ODnorm 1 1 BACT 1 765.3333 108.33333 2 1 BACT 2 745.3333 88.33333 3 1 BACT 3 675.0000 18.00000 (You might wish for "cbind(OD,ODnorm) ~ . - Well", but aggregate.formula is not smart enough for that.) -pd > On 24 Oct 2023, at

Dear R users I get different F-statistic results for a "within" model, when using "time" or "twoways" effects in plm() [1] and when manually specifying the time control dummies [2]. [1] vignette("plm") [2] http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Farnsworth-EconometricsInR.pdf Two examples below: library("AER") data("Grunfeld", package =

Hi All, Two and three-node clusters with SC3.2 and S10u3 (120011-14). If a node is rebooted when using SCSI3-PGR the node is not able to take the zpool by HAStoragePlus due to reservation conflict. SCSI2-PGRE is okay. Using the same SAN-LUN:s in a metaset (SVM) and HAStoragePlus works okay with PGR and PGRE. (both SMI and EFI-labled disks) If using scshutdown and restart all nodes then it will

> Here is a trivial reason why I have not propagated http://bb.pgr.jp/ . > Sometimes (but I suppose rarely) he reports false alarm in a few > points. He'd send blames to the llvm-testresults if his master (aka I) > knew he were mature. > > I don't also want him promoted and called as one of official > buildbots. He is my pet, though, I expect he should be helpful to

Here is a trivial reason why I have not propagated http://bb.pgr.jp/ . Sometimes (but I suppose rarely) he reports false alarm in a few points. He'd send blames to the llvm-testresults if his master (aka I) knew he were mature. I don't also want him promoted and called as one of official buildbots. He is my pet, though, I expect he should be helpful to the developers. ...Takumi

> I think this is the right thing to do. Once you've resolved the Mac and Windows issues, go for it. Thanks Doub. Just to let people know what happened. I enabled in r174322 around lunchtime. Here's a report of the noticed failures with status (important/outstanding ones at the top). Feel free to do anything from telling me about more problems to reverting the patch when llvm.org comes

Does opensolaris iSCSI target support SCSI-3 PGR reservation ? My goal is to use the iSCSI LUN created by [1] or [2] as a quorum device for a 3-node suncluster. [1] zfs set shareiscsi=on <storage-pool/zfs volume name> [2] iscsitadm create target ..... Thanks, -- leon This message posted from opensolaris.org

Good point. Now this returns 0.04062184. Hmmm..... On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Hollie Johnson (PGR) < h.a.johnson at newcastle.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > > Thanks for having a look into this. I think you have a small typo... > > B <- matrix(x, nrow=3, byrow = TRUE) should read B <- matrix(y, nrow=3, > byrow = TRUE) > > > Regards, Hollie >

Hi Jin-Gu Kang! It are possible that the problem you are experiencing have already been solved in the current llvm 2.6 release tree and the current svn trunk. So try using llc from llvm 2.6 release branch or llvm pre2.7 svn trunk! It would be helpful if you could open a bugreport for this issue and attach the problematic od.bc since we need a testcase from the bitcode that exposes the bug inorder

Unlike llvm itself, llvm-gcc needs to be configured for a particular target architecture. It looks like you're using a copy of llvm-gcc that was built to generate x86 code. On Sep 30, 2009, at 6:27 AM, Jin Gu Kang wrote: > Dear LLVM members. > > I am compiling coreutils-7.4 package for ARM linux using LLVM 2.5 > version. > > When i compiled 'od' program in

Dear LLVM members. I am compiling coreutils-7.4 package for ARM linux using LLVM 2.5 version. When i compiled 'od' program in coreutils package using LLVM 2.5, i could see the error message on llc processing. > llvm-gcc -emit-llvm ./od.c -c -o ./od.bc -other-options... > llc -march=arm ./od.bc -f -o ./od.s llc:

Hi Bob! I could not find llvm file for ARM target in llvm-gcc 4.2 front end source code. $llvm-gcc-src/gcc/config.gcc file alpha*-*-*) cpu_type=alpha need_64bit_hwint=yes # LLVM LOCAL begin out_cxx_file=alpha/llvm-alpha.cpp # LLVM LOCAL end ;; ... arm*-*-*) cpu_type=arm extra_headers="mmintrin.h" ;; ... i[34567]86-*-*) cpu_type=i386 # LLVM LOCAL begin

That is from 2.5, and just because there is nothing special listed in config.gcc does not mean it doesn't work. For 2.5, the ARM port of llvm-gcc did not require a separate llvm-arm.cpp source file, so nothing needed to be added to config.gcc. It worked fine as far as I know. For 2.6, you will see that there are some ARM-related changes to config.gcc in llvm-gcc. On Sep 30, 2009,

Hello all, I am using 'plot' to create standard curves for elisa data. when I use 'plot' with type='b' i get the points connected with lines and one straigth line from the lowest datapoint to the highest data point. how can i avoid/remove it from the figure. i am using R2.9.1, below is the example of the data. od<-c(10, 8, 6,4,2,1, 10.5,7.8,6.4,3.8,2.1,0.95)

So far two bots have complained about 2.7 (but have 2.6): http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-i686-cygwin-RA-centos6/builds/12836/steps/configure/logs/stdio http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-s390x-linux1/builds/12002/steps/configure/logs/stdio Should we just upgrade those bots or reduce the requirement to 2.6? On 12 December 2014 at 06:41, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > +1

On 15.11.2012, at 23:16, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> kinda random, but do we have a centralized list of all of the >> buildbots? I see a lot of different URL's in IRC, but no list so I can >> check "all of the waterfalls". I'm not talking about the

Greetings running dovecot for my first time on an OSX 10.6 server. after a reboot, several users are not able to Authenticate. here is a sample Oct 5 20:22:32 hsmail dovecot[2142]: auth(default): od(juser,127.0.0.1): auth mech=CRAM-MD5 Oct 5 20:22:32 hsmail dovecot[2142]: auth(default): od(juser,127.0.0.1): username=juser, challenge=<6757250558559635.1286324552 at

Hi dovecot masters, This is my first post here, since I desperately need some advices from the dovecot community. I've tried to get an answer on the Apple Forums but til now no luck....here we go: I've tried to sync our users emails (Mac OS X Server 10.6.8 Snow Leopard with dovecot 1.1.20-apple0.5) via imapsync to our new server by using the masterusers authentication method on the old