Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[PATCH 1/2] remove __init modifier from header declaration"
2007 Dec 18
3
[PATCH] finish processor.h integration
What's left in processor_32.h and processor_64.h cannot be cleanly
integrated. However, it's just a couple of definitions. They are moved
to processor.h around ifdefs, and the original files are deleted. Note that
there's much less headers included in the final version.
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
---
include/asm-x86/processor.h | 140
2007 Dec 18
3
[PATCH] finish processor.h integration
What's left in processor_32.h and processor_64.h cannot be cleanly
integrated. However, it's just a couple of definitions. They are moved
to processor.h around ifdefs, and the original files are deleted. Note that
there's much less headers included in the final version.
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
---
include/asm-x86/processor.h | 140
2007 Dec 17
5
[PATCH 0/21] Integrate processor.h
Hi,
This series integrate the processor.h header. There are a lot of things
that are deeply architectural differences between architectures, but
I've done my best to come to a settlement.
With this series, I am very close to have selectable paravirt for x86_64,
It applies ontop of today's x86 git, mm branch.
2007 Dec 17
5
[PATCH 0/21] Integrate processor.h
Hi,
This series integrate the processor.h header. There are a lot of things
that are deeply architectural differences between architectures, but
I've done my best to come to a settlement.
With this series, I am very close to have selectable paravirt for x86_64,
It applies ontop of today's x86 git, mm branch.
2016 Nov 16
2
[PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax_yield definition
No need to duplicate the same define everywhere. Since
the only user is stop-machine and the only provider is
s390, we can use a default implementation of cpu_relax_yield
in sched.h.
Suggested-by: Russell King <linux at armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/processor.h | 1 -
arch/arc/include/asm/processor.h
2016 Nov 16
2
[PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax_yield definition
No need to duplicate the same define everywhere. Since
the only user is stop-machine and the only provider is
s390, we can use a default implementation of cpu_relax_yield
in sched.h.
Suggested-by: Russell King <linux at armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/processor.h | 1 -
arch/arc/include/asm/processor.h
2016 Oct 25
7
[GIT PULL v2 0/5] cpu_relax: drop lowlatency, introduce yield
Peter,
here is v2 with some improved patch descriptions and some fixes. The
previous version has survived one day of linux-next and I only changed
small parts.
So unless there is some other issue, feel free to pull (or to apply
the patches) to tip/locking.
The following changes since commit 07d9a380680d1c0eb51ef87ff2eab5c994949e69:
Linux 4.9-rc2 (2016-10-23 17:10:14 -0700)
are available in
2016 Oct 25
7
[GIT PULL v2 0/5] cpu_relax: drop lowlatency, introduce yield
Peter,
here is v2 with some improved patch descriptions and some fixes. The
previous version has survived one day of linux-next and I only changed
small parts.
So unless there is some other issue, feel free to pull (or to apply
the patches) to tip/locking.
The following changes since commit 07d9a380680d1c0eb51ef87ff2eab5c994949e69:
Linux 4.9-rc2 (2016-10-23 17:10:14 -0700)
are available in
2013 Oct 22
9
[PATCH 0/3] x86: Support compiling out userspace I/O (iopl and ioperm)
This patch series makes it possible to compile out the iopl and ioperm system
calls, which allow privileged processes to request permission to directly poke
I/O ports from userspace.
Nothing on a modern Linux system uses these calls anymore, and anything new
should be using /dev/port instead, or better yet writing a driver.
Copying the bloat-o-meter stats from the final patch:
32-bit
2013 Oct 22
9
[PATCH 0/3] x86: Support compiling out userspace I/O (iopl and ioperm)
This patch series makes it possible to compile out the iopl and ioperm system
calls, which allow privileged processes to request permission to directly poke
I/O ports from userspace.
Nothing on a modern Linux system uses these calls anymore, and anything new
should be using /dev/port instead, or better yet writing a driver.
Copying the bloat-o-meter stats from the final patch:
32-bit
2014 Nov 02
12
[PATCH v4 00/10] x86: Support compiling out userspace IO (iopl and ioperm)
This patch series makes it possible to compile out the userspace IO system
calls, iopl and ioperm.
The first patch does some 32/64 unification in copy_thread to make subsequent
changes easier. The second patch simplifies the complex calculation of the TSS
segment limit, which also makes it easier to change in the last patch. Patches
3-9 introduce helpers to make it easier to compile out IO.
2014 Nov 02
12
[PATCH v4 00/10] x86: Support compiling out userspace IO (iopl and ioperm)
This patch series makes it possible to compile out the userspace IO system
calls, iopl and ioperm.
The first patch does some 32/64 unification in copy_thread to make subsequent
changes easier. The second patch simplifies the complex calculation of the TSS
segment limit, which also makes it easier to change in the last patch. Patches
3-9 introduce helpers to make it easier to compile out IO.
2014 Oct 29
4
[PATCH v3 1/3] x86: process: Unify 32-bit and 64-bit copy_thread I/O bitmap handling
The 32-bit and 64-bit versions of copy_thread have functionally
identical handling for copying the I/O bitmap, modulo differences in
error handling. Clean up the error paths in both by moving the copy of
the I/O bitmap to the end, to eliminate the need to free it if
subsequent copy steps fail; move the resulting identical code to a
static inline in a common header.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
2014 Oct 29
4
[PATCH v3 1/3] x86: process: Unify 32-bit and 64-bit copy_thread I/O bitmap handling
The 32-bit and 64-bit versions of copy_thread have functionally
identical handling for copying the I/O bitmap, modulo differences in
error handling. Clean up the error paths in both by moving the copy of
the I/O bitmap to the end, to eliminate the need to free it if
subsequent copy steps fail; move the resulting identical code to a
static inline in a common header.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
2014 Mar 11
2
[PATCHv2 1/3] x86: process: Unify 32-bit and 64-bit copy_thread I/O bitmap handling
The 32-bit and 64-bit versions of copy_thread have functionally
identical handling for copying the I/O bitmap, modulo differences in
error handling. Clean up the error paths in both by moving the copy of
the I/O bitmap to the end, to eliminate the need to free it if
subsequent copy steps fail; move the resulting identical code to a
static inline in a common header.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
2014 Mar 11
2
[PATCHv2 1/3] x86: process: Unify 32-bit and 64-bit copy_thread I/O bitmap handling
The 32-bit and 64-bit versions of copy_thread have functionally
identical handling for copying the I/O bitmap, modulo differences in
error handling. Clean up the error paths in both by moving the copy of
the I/O bitmap to the end, to eliminate the need to free it if
subsequent copy steps fail; move the resulting identical code to a
static inline in a common header.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 1/7] cleanup: paravirt unhandled fallthrough
The current code simply calls "start_kernel" directly if we're under a
hypervisor and no paravirt_ops backend wants us, because paravirt.c
registers that as a backend.
This was always a vain hope; start_kernel won't get far without setup.
It's also impossible for paravirt_ops backends which don't sit in the
arch/i386/kernel directory: they can't link before
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 1/7] cleanup: paravirt unhandled fallthrough
The current code simply calls "start_kernel" directly if we're under a
hypervisor and no paravirt_ops backend wants us, because paravirt.c
registers that as a backend.
This was always a vain hope; start_kernel won't get far without setup.
It's also impossible for paravirt_ops backends which don't sit in the
arch/i386/kernel directory: they can't link before
2007 Dec 06
51
[PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration
Hi,
this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends
across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a
side-effect for x86_64.
I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing
effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to
accomplish that.
I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.
2007 Dec 06
51
[PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration
Hi,
this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends
across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a
side-effect for x86_64.
I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing
effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to
accomplish that.
I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.