Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration"
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 2/12] ldt-accessors
Introduce a write acessor for updating the current LDT. This is required for
hypervisors like Xen that do not allow LDT pages to be directly written.
Testing - here's a fun little LDT test that can be trivially modified to test
limits as well.
/*
* Copyright (c) 2005, Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com)
* This is licensed under the GPL.
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 2/12] ldt-accessors
Introduce a write acessor for updating the current LDT. This is required for
hypervisors like Xen that do not allow LDT pages to be directly written.
Testing - here's a fun little LDT test that can be trivially modified to test
limits as well.
/*
* Copyright (c) 2005, Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com)
* This is licensed under the GPL.
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no_paravirt.h for native ops
(Andrew, please sit these in the -mm tree for cooking)
Create a paravirt.h header for (almost) all the critical operations
which need to be replaced with hypervisor calls.
For the moment, this simply includes no_paravirt.h, where all the
native implementations now live.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no_paravirt.h for native ops
(Andrew, please sit these in the -mm tree for cooking)
Create a paravirt.h header for (almost) all the critical operations
which need to be replaced with hypervisor calls.
For the moment, this simply includes no_paravirt.h, where all the
native implementations now live.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
2017 May 19
13
[PATCH 00/10] paravirt: make amount of paravirtualization configurable
Today paravirtualization is a all-or-nothing game: either a kernel is
compiled with no paravirtualization support at all, or it is supporting
paravirtualized environments like Xen pv-guests or lguest additionally
to some paravirtualized tuning for KVM, Hyperv, VMWare or Xen
HVM-guests.
As support of pv-guests requires quite intrusive pv-hooks (e.g. all
access functions to page table entries,
2017 May 19
13
[PATCH 00/10] paravirt: make amount of paravirtualization configurable
Today paravirtualization is a all-or-nothing game: either a kernel is
compiled with no paravirtualization support at all, or it is supporting
paravirtualized environments like Xen pv-guests or lguest additionally
to some paravirtualized tuning for KVM, Hyperv, VMWare or Xen
HVM-guests.
As support of pv-guests requires quite intrusive pv-hooks (e.g. all
access functions to page table entries,
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/3] Paravirtualization: Kernel Ring Cleanups
Hi all,
I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and
other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're
getting somewhere.
These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the
VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0,
and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The
third patch is
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/3] Paravirtualization: Kernel Ring Cleanups
Hi all,
I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and
other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're
getting somewhere.
These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the
VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0,
and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The
third patch is
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 3/6] i386 virtualization - Make ldt a desc struct
* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote:
> Make the LDT a desc_struct pointer, since this is what it actually is.
I like that plan.
> There is code which relies on the fact that LDTs are allocated in page
> chunks, and it is both cleaner and more convenient to keep the rather
> poorly named "size" variable from the LDT in terms of LDT pages.
I noticed it's replaced
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 3/6] i386 virtualization - Make ldt a desc struct
* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote:
> Make the LDT a desc_struct pointer, since this is what it actually is.
I like that plan.
> There is code which relies on the fact that LDTs are allocated in page
> chunks, and it is both cleaner and more convenient to keep the rather
> poorly named "size" variable from the LDT in terms of LDT pages.
I noticed it's replaced
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 12/21] i386 Deprecate descriptor asm
Ancient inline assembler that manipulates descriptor tables is unreadable
and has no type checking. Doing this in C actually generates better code,
saves code space, and improves readability.
The fact that you must cast descriptors to (char *) for the inline assembler
to work properly caused me no end of grief working on these patches.
Note that GCC does not generate rotations to utilize
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 12/21] i386 Deprecate descriptor asm
Ancient inline assembler that manipulates descriptor tables is unreadable
and has no type checking. Doing this in C actually generates better code,
saves code space, and improves readability.
The fact that you must cast descriptors to (char *) for the inline assembler
to work properly caused me no end of grief working on these patches.
Note that GCC does not generate rotations to utilize
2007 Apr 18
2
proposed interface change for setting the ldt
At the moment, all the places where the LDT are set in the kernel are of
the form:
set_ldt_desc(cpu, segments, count);
load_LDT_desc();
(two instances in asm-i386/desc.h). set_ldt_desc() sets an LDT
descriptor in the GDT, and load_LDT_desc() is basically just lldt. These
map to the write_gdt_entry and load_ldt_desc paravirt ops.
This doesn't work well for Xen, because you set
2007 Dec 13
2
[PATCH] avoid ifdefs in desc.h, getting rid of pack_ldt and pack_tss
By Andi Kleen's suggestion, this patch removes pack_ldt() and pack_tss()
wrappers in favour of a general wrapper. It saves us an ifdef and some lines
of code, but more importantly, it's more elegant.
No functional change is made.
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
---
include/asm-x86/desc.h | 55 ++++++++++++++---------------------------------
1 files
2007 Dec 13
2
[PATCH] avoid ifdefs in desc.h, getting rid of pack_ldt and pack_tss
By Andi Kleen's suggestion, this patch removes pack_ldt() and pack_tss()
wrappers in favour of a general wrapper. It saves us an ifdef and some lines
of code, but more importantly, it's more elegant.
No functional change is made.
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
---
include/asm-x86/desc.h | 55 ++++++++++++++---------------------------------
1 files
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 07/17] paravirt_ops - descriptor changes.
plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-desc-header.patch)
Update the descriptors for an interface with paravirt ops
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Index: clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h
===================================================================
---
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 07/17] paravirt_ops - descriptor changes.
plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-desc-header.patch)
Update the descriptors for an interface with paravirt ops
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Index: clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h
===================================================================
---
2020 Jul 14
92
[PATCH v4 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I
addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and
rebased the code v5.8-rc5.
The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the
#VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big
pile of entry code changes merged into
2020 Jul 14
92
[PATCH v4 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I
addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and
rebased the code v5.8-rc5.
The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the
#VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big
pile of entry code changes merged into
2018 Aug 13
11
[PATCH v2 00/11] x86/paravirt: several cleanups
This series removes some no longer needed stuff from paravirt
infrastructure and puts large quantities of paravirt ops under a new
config option PARAVIRT_XXL which is selected by XEN_PV only.
A pvops kernel without XEN_PV being configured is about 2.5% smaller
with this series applied.
tip commit 5800dc5c19f34e6e03b5adab1282535cb102fafd ("x86/paravirt:
Fix spectre-v2 mitigations for