similar to: [Bridge] Re: [VLAN] newbie problems

Hi, I have a router that got its second link. I was trying to do load balancing, but i can not get it to work properly. Just one link works at time, and is always the second in the command ip route add default table 222 proto static. Am I missing something? My script is below. I am using Debian, tried with kernel 2.6.19 (my compilation) or debian''s one (2.6.18-3-486), same results

hi i''ve not found many hints on shorewall/ucarp/conntrackd topic. i''m sharing this with the list, so that i''m able to search and find it the next time. :) i''ve setup 2 identical systems with shorewall, ucarp and conntrackd in an active/backup way. ucarp just calls ifup/ifdown, all network configuration is maintained in /etc/network/interfaces (Debian),

Hi Everybody in the list I have a situation like this ------ (IP1) linux |----eth0.40------ | router | | | box | (IP2) |------|Client Router ( Destiantion Net DNET) |----eth0.41------ | | /27 subnet ------ I just want to balance the load of bandwidth per packet based between the two vlan interfaces to Client Destination network

Hello i want to luanch an URL in my PC when i call a number like below exten => 066104xxxx,1,Set(CALLERID(number)=52xxxxxxx) exten => 066104xxxx,n,MixMonitor(zap_g1_${EXTEN}_${UNIQUEID}.wav|av(0}V(0)) exten => 066104xxxx,n,Dial(Zap/g1/${EXTEN},30,A(this-call-may-be-monitored-or-recorded)) exten => 066104xxxx,n,http://192.168.5.109/interface2/interface2.php ( here i want to launch

Hello, i have ported the BCP (Bride Control Protocol) patch for pppd 2.4.1 mentioned in http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/bridge/2004-September/000619.html to pppd 2.4.2. The kernel patch still works without problems with kernel 2.4.30. Perhaps someone else could use this patch ... Here again some documentation i have found about the BCP patch somewere else: When pppd negotiates BCP, it tells

hi, try exten = .....,n,System(wget -P /var/log/asterisk/wgets 'http://theUrlYouWantToCall' &) kind regards, andre Am 30.05.2013 19:00, schrieb asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com: > Message: 9 > Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 15:06:59 +0000 > From: Salaheddine Elharit <salah.elharit200 at gmail.com> > Subject: [asterisk-users] how to launch a URl when dialing a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 Summary: system hangs, Availability problems, maybe conntrack bug, possible reason here. Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2

Hello Lartc Mailing List: Been working on something the last week and a half and ALMOST have it working.., just need a few pointers from the wizards on this mailing list to nail it. Ok, my setup is a hub and spoke arrangement, hub is Cisco 2821 with IOS 12.4. Spokes are ruggencom RX1000 routers, Debian based with the following versions installed: rx1000test:~# uname -a Linux rx1000test

<I apologize if this arrives twice... I sent it first from an non-subscribed address, don't know if that'll get to the list or not --JJ> Hi folks, I have an implementation question regarding bridging on a linux box between a catalyst trunk port and a cisco 26something w/802.1q subinterfaces. So right now, there's no vlan trunking going on on the link my bridging firewall sits

Hello all, I have a CentOS box that has a NIC (eth0) on which I defined 4 VLAN's (counting the NIC itself): eth0, eth0.1, eth0.2 and eht0.3. Initially the Cisco switch was not partitioned into VLAN's which means that the only VLAN running on it was the default one (VLAN 1). I have then played with VLAN's a bit on the switch and at this point have two: VLAN 1 (which is default and can

Running shorewall 3.0.6, Linux 2.6.16, iptables 1.3.0. This firewall has eth1 facing the DMZ and eth0 is a 802.1q trunk with 6 VLANs and zones on it. I would like to allow one subnet living out beyond the DMZ to have access to all zones on this firewall. It seemed that creating a zone would allow for this to be done cleanly via a line in the policy file. I defined this special subnet as the

Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs).

Hello FrancisM, Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing to > bring-up. So this is what Im doing > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this > 2 port configured for teaming1 (set as link only port) -> Create Bridge > (br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40

Hello all, I have created this module: https://github.com/Spantree/puppet-thrift and everything worked fine all specs ran fine. Now I using the puppetlabs/apt module and when I run the 'rake spec' it is trying to run the 'apt' tests, and it is failing (I think) because I am not providing the appropriate facts. Is there a way to ignore the rspecs inside the

OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port? Boris. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:53 PM, SilverTip257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> wrote: > Andrew and Dennis are spot on. > Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and > not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < > dennisml at

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> wrote: > Hello FrancisM, > > Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: > > > > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing > to > > bring-up. So this is what Im doing > > > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this > > > 2 port

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> wrote: > >> Hello FrancisM, >> >> Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote: >> >> >> > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is >> failing to

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:20 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, FrancisM <francis at mytechrepublic.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello FrancisM, >>> >>> Thursday, April 7,

>-----Original Message----- >From: Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] >Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 10:24 PM >To: Bart De Schuymer >Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com; vlan@wanfear.com; bridge >Subject: [VLAN] Re: [PATCH/RFC] Let {ip,arp}tables "see" bridged VLAN >tagged{I,AR}P packets > > >Bart De Schuymer wrote: >> - add some code in

Hi, I'm using Dovecot 1.0rc15 from Debian stable/etch. I'd like to have Dovecot listen on more than one interface. It shall listen on one IPv4 Interface and on one IPv6 Interface. The comments in the sample configuration file say, that it's not possible to listen on more than one interface at a time. Sadly it's no option to me to listen on all interfaces. So I'd like to ask