similar to: [Bridge] Re: 4 port ethernet card bridge question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[Bridge] Re: 4 port ethernet card bridge question"

2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Network seperation and ethernet bridge...
Hello all, I would like to know if it is possible to have 2 bridge instances running - one for the internal network and the other for the external network. What I need to explain is that I need the internal bridge to go though the Linux Kernel and pass its packets to the external network bridge. I am also hopeful that the internal network bridge will not need an IP address as I am hoping to
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Backport
Hell everyone, I am wondering if any of you had backported bridge driver to kernel 2.4.x? Thanks! Hai -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/2005110= 7/b0e0c092/attachment.htm
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] [PATCH] (1/4) bridge: use jenkins hash
Replace the existing mac hash in the bridge code with the nice inline jenkins hash. This should provide better distribution across hash buckets and compiles to code that is similar in complexity. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> diff -Nru a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c 2005-03-10 15:05:11 -08:00 +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] [PATCH] turn off debug error message in bridge ioctl
Trivial patch to turn off a debug message. It seems some SNMP daemons just periodically trying to look at MII state. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> diff -Nru a/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c b/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c --- a/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c 2004-06-22 16:28:20 -07:00 +++ b/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c 2004-06-22 16:28:20 -07:00 @@ -403,6 +403,6 @@ } - printk(KERN_DEBUG
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Re: hang on PPC
Scratch that last comment. The kernel code I have now is identical to what I posted. Sorry for the misinformation. > -----Original Message----- > From: bridge-bounces@lists.osdl.org > [mailto:bridge-bounces@lists.osdl.org] On Behalf Of Eble, Dan > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 12:57 PM > To: 'arkady-parabel@ngs.ru' > Cc: bridge@osdl.org > Subject: RE: [Bridge] Re:
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Re: hang on PPC
Pavel, you may be interested in my work on Cisco HDLC bridging: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=108802311131855&w=2 I have used it with the bridge driver (in 2.4) without any problems (yet ;)), and I am sure Krzysztof Halasa, the HDLC maintainer, would be thrilled if you managed to port it to a recent version of the kernel and make it a compile-time option. Oh, it also
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Update OSDL/Linux-Foundation maintainer addresses
Hi, I'm not sure if this is apprriate or not, but here goes anyway. The patch below updates MAINTAIER address Individuals (Only Andrew :): osdl.org -> linux-foundation.org Lists: osdl.org -> lists.osdl.org I assume the latter will change at some stage, but at least with this change the osdl/linux-foundation lists are consistent. Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
2007 Apr 18
5
[Bridge] Bridge MAC address
Sorry, if this question has been answered before, but I could not find out with a brief look. How can I set the MAC address for a bridge? The MAC address given for the bridge device seems to be the one it sends network packets with if the bridge device has an IP address set. Apparently the bridge starts with a zero MAC address and when the first interface is attached to it, it takes its MAC
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Adding same physical port to multiple bridges
Hi, Is there any particular reason why the same physical port cannot be added to multiple bridges? Is it because of STP? If I am not using STP - can I change the code to have the same physical port in 2 VLANs? Is that a safe change? Thanks, Abhijit
2007 Apr 23
0
[Bridge] Update lists.osdl.org to lists.linux-foundation.org
lists.linux-foundation.org seems to be funtional now, so I guess it is as good a time as any to update the MAINTAINERS file. Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> --- There are still some http links to osdl.org, but I'm not sure if they should be updated, and if so, what they should be updated to. Index: linux-2.6/MAINTAINERS
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] [PATCH] fix 802.3ad multicast
Hi Stephen, there was a bug in bridging bonds. multicast packets needed for 802.3ad netif_carrier_ok() were dropped. attached patch works for me. Cheers, Vlad. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fix_br_multicast.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1344 bytes Desc: not available Url :
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Some Questions
I am battling an issue with use of bridging with xen. For some yet undetermined reason supposedly relating to stp, they assign a mac address of fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff to the bridge. Was hoping someone here may be able to elaborate on that. If I enslave a bridge to an ethernet, and than restart that network interface, should the bridge operation behave the same after the ip interface is restarted?
2007 Apr 18
7
[Bridge] Passing vlan tagged packets through linux bridge
> Use an Intel pro/100 or pro/1000 driver..they are known to > work with VLANs. > > I guess it's also possible that it's a problem in the > bridging code, so try the latest kernel > as well... I compiled the latest 2.6.19 kernel and tested it with two 3COM 3c905c fast ethernet interfaces which work fine with vlan 802.1q tagging, but when I have added the eth0 and eth1
2007 Apr 18
6
[Bridge] No UDP NFS over bridges in Linux 2.6.16.x?
Hi, I have 2 servers which are connected to a gateway machine. The gateway and one server are running Linux 2.6.16.2, while the third machine is running 2.6.16.5. The two ethernet ports on the gateway which are connected to the servers are combined into a single ethernet bridge device. Ever since 2.6.16, I have noticed that I can no longer cross-mount the two servers' /home directories via
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] is there RSTP for 2.6 kernel available?
Hi all, Can someone tell me where to find source code for RSTP for linux 2.6 kernel? Thank you in advance. -Marc.
2007 Apr 18
2
[Bridge] [RFC] bridge kernel API change
Here is the proposed revision to the bridge utilities interface to the kernel. The driving force is that the existing interface can't easily be converted to 32/64 bit compat. Right now, the bridge-utils (brctl) tries to handle 32bit command on 64 bit kernel, but the code is limited to sparc and wrong. Here is what I am thinking. get version - not needed? get bridges -
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] [BRIDGE] Unaligned access on IA64 when comparing ethernet addresses
From: Evgeny Kravtsunov <emkravts@openvz.org> compare_ether_addr() implicitly requires that the addresses passed are 2-bytes aligned in memory. This is not true for br_stp_change_bridge_id() and br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id() in which one of the addresses is unsigned char *, and thus may not be 2-bytes aligned. Signed-off-by: Evgeny Kravtsunov <emkravts@openvz.org> Signed-off-by:
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] [PATCH 2.4] Bridge STP message age
This is the 2.4 version which incorporates the observations from Kishore about 2.6. The existing 2.4 code set the age properly, but did not increment correctly for HZ=1000 and could send a stale (expired) configuration. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> diff -Nru a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c 2004-06-29 15:30:32 -07:00 +++
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Information needed about bridge c code
Hello, i need to write a little personal patch in the bridge code. For this patch, i need to know the original src and dst mac addresses of the packet incoming to the bridge. As i work on a brouter (some packets are bridged, some are routed based on ebtable rules), packets that are routed have their mac addresses modified by the IP stack). I put a software probe in br_input.c::br_handle_frame( ),
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] RE: BCP protocol
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemminger@osdl.org] > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 11:41 AM > > Could you work with 2.6 rather than 2.4? I'm truly sorry, but I get paid to work with 2.4. My employer understands the value of giving back to the open source community, and this is what we have at the moment. Someone else is going to have to