similar to: [Bridge] Re: bridge can't get ip by "dhcpcd br0"

dear all: I try to configure a bridge in my embedded linux. I had fininshed these operations below: 1) configure kernel, select the option "802.1d bridge" 2) compile bridge-utils 3) issue these commands: ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 brctl addbr vb brctl addif vb eth0 brctl addif vb eth1 ifconfig vb 192.168.110.24 up

dear all: I try to configure a bridge in my embedded linux. I had fininshed these operations below: 1) configure kernel, select the option "802.1d bridge" 2) compile bridge-utils 3) issue these commands: ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 brctl addbr vb brctl addif vb eth0 brctl addif vb eth1 ifconfig vb 192.168.110.24 up

Hello! "brctl stp br0" would crash brctl provided that br0 is a bridge. This is caused by incorrect number of arguments in the commands table. "stp" needs at least 2 arguments after "stp". The patch against version 1.0.4 is attached. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin -------------- next part -------------- --- brctl/brctl_cmd.c +++ brctl/brctl_cmd.c @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@

Hi, we're running the standard linux bridge setup (redundant bridge) for 5 years now. So first of all, thanks to everyone involved for implementing the bridging feature in Linux. Now I'm trying to bridge hosts connected to VLAN'ed Cisco switches using linux bridge. I'm testing the following setup (Kernel 2.6.19, bridge-utils 1.2 on both bridges)

I am doing some testing of openwrt'd wireless access points, using madwifi-ng'd atheros radios. In the test configuration, I have three devices in a triangle, each has wds links to the other two devices. The ath0 interface is in ap mode, ath1 is a wds link to one device, and ath2 is a wds link to the other device. All three interfaces (and an ethernet interface) are in a bridge (br-lan)

1. Link state monitoring added. We discovered the following problem with the existing bridge code. The code doesn't monitor the link state of the interfaces. When using two cisco switches with two Linux bridging firewalls the following problem exists. When the Cisco switch that has the blocking (stp) Linux bridge attached dies, the Linux bridge no longer receives stp packets and changes

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:50:15 +0100 "Andre Santos \(Ecofilmes\)" <andre.santos@ecofilmes.pt> wrote: > Hi there, > > I want to have a computer betwen the internet and the network to see the trafic and control. > I used windows, but its somehow limited, and want to try linux... > I installed Fedora linux in server mode, and now Im trying to put 2 nics in bridge.

dhcpcd requires an interface name as parameter to work. We are now getting it from /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/ folder children. dhclient on Debian also has the problem, thus use the guessed interface name for it too. --- appliance/init | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/appliance/init b/appliance/init index cca62e7..d5a428d 100755 --- a/appliance/init +++

dhcpcd requires an interface name as parameter to work. We are now getting it from /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/ folder children. --- appliance/init | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/appliance/init b/appliance/init index cca62e7..ef18959 100755 --- a/appliance/init +++ b/appliance/init @@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ if test "$guestfs_network" = 1; then if

Hi, ran into a problem w/ linode hosted VM where IPv6 address changed after they migrated it to a different host. They claim I can fix it with sed -i 's/slaac private/slaac hwaddr/' /etc/dhcpcd.conf However there appears to be no dhcpcd.conf on any of my CentOS 7 systems. What is the CentOS 7 equivalent?

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:603-01 Moderate: dhcpcd security update Files available: dhcpcd-1.3.20pl0-2.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:21:56 +0100 "Marc Juette" <m.juette@fox-netcenter.de> wrote: > > Hello, I?m writing to you, because i?ve had the same problem with SuSE 9.2 and bridging. I tested a few setting (bridging as module, bridging compiled within Kernel...), but nothing matched. So I decided to install 9.1 and test again. And wow, it worked with only a few command lines:

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:21:59 +0530 (IST) <ravivsn@www.rocsys.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I wrote a module to create dummy ethernet device, the intention is to > add it to a bridge and transmit modified packets. I get ethernet device > created but its xmit function is not called when the bridge receives a > packet. The interface has to go through the Spanning Tree Protocol

Package: logcheck Severity: wishlist I'm attaching rules suggestions for dhcpcd as a git patch, and also a sample from my logs. Please review the patch (I can fix any issues with it) and include in logcheck if you like it. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Added-rules-for-dhcpcd.patch URL:

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:14:04 +0100 (MET) "Thomas Franke" <thomas-carsten.franke@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi, > > first of all - sorry that I'm contacting directly, but I'm in time > critical situation ... hopefully you can help me. > I'm using SuSE 9.2 kernel 2.6.8-24.3-smp (latest version from suse) > I wanted to bringup a bridge on my machine. After

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:43:30 +0700 <arkady-parabel@ngs.ru> wrote: > Hi. > > I'm using a powerpc-based board (CPU - Motorolla 82855, 50 > Mhz) with 32 Mb of RAM, Big Endian. > Linux kernel - 2.4.22, bridge - statically linked & as a > module > brctl - 0.9.6 > Ethernet - fec (arch/ppc/8xx_io/fec.c) > All this was compiled with gcc version 3.2.2 20030217

Hi, I added below code in /etc/rc.d/rc.local in order to load the bridge brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 wlan0 ifconfig br0 up but it fail, i found error in /var/log/message said localhost: modprobe: modprobe cannot locate br0 modules but i found it said suceedly up the br0 interface anyone know? ===== Ô¸ÄúÓÀÔ¶ÐÒ¸££¬¿ìÀֺͰ²Ïê Happy & Healthy Always ! ^_^ !

Hello, I've been trying to implement a bridge in place for a clustered firewall at one of our office locations. Currently we NAT two class C's internally. We decided, for performance reasons, that it would make sense to put our servers into an official DMZ. So we started this bridging project. Our goal is to have two redundant firewalls in place. There is no need for active/active.

Hello You must add first: vlan (tagged) to eth2 eth2 interface is not tagged by default and not know vlan-s . It is like a cisco if you have 24 ports in cisco by default all ports are in vlan1. if you want to do trunk (with vlans) you myst add (vlans) to this ports (tagged or untagged) So you can compare that all interfaces in linux by default are in one vlan(but not tagged). (only for

Santiago, I appreciate your offer. I'm not really a kernel hacker, however I do know C and I would be willing to try if you point me in the right direction. Here is my first attempt using Debian running on an UltraSPARC: debian{root}:/root<512>strace -f -F -v brctl addbr br0 execve("/usr/sbin/brctl", ["brctl", "addbr", "br0"], [/* 16 vars */]) =