similar to: Samba 4.20 ACL issue with FreeBSD (UFS)

> I am now wondering if there is some change to the port which assumes ZFS or similar. In the past it was required to put the sysvol on UFS otherwise it wouldn?t work but times change :) > > Any ideas gratefully received, I guess I can try switching to ZFS but that would be a bit of a PITA I would like to avoid unless necessary. > ZFS ACL handling in Samba 4.20-4.22 on FreeBSD is

Hi, I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the folowing error: ?ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires.? Try the mounting the filesystem with the

I have samba 4.3 running on FreeBSD 10.2 on ZFS and I am unable to create new GPOs, getting "invalid Parameter" response.Log files indicate ACL issues. Domain was provisioned with --use-ntvfs option.Filesystem is mounted with this options:zroot/ROOT/default on / (zfs, local, noatime, nfsv4acls) acl options on zfs are this:zroot/ROOT/default aclmode passthrough inherited from

On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 06:19 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems > the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the > folowing error: Can you explain a bit more about what you are doing with CircleCI? This will help me understand how best to advise you. >

On 14.08.2003 15:36, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > I just noticed a problem with periodic scripts inside a jail. I'm getting: > > Local system status: > tee: /dev/stderr: Operation not supported > > Mail in local queue: > tee: /dev/stderr: Operation not supported > > Mail in submit queue: > tee: /dev/stderr: Operation not supported > > in the periodic daily,

Hi and happy new year everyone i am testing classic upgrade with recent samba versions everything is ok until version 4.19 but for samba version 4.20 (4.20.6+dfsg-1~~mjt+ubt22 amd64) and 4.21, it fails with this message Failed to connect to 'ldap://localhost' with backend 'ldap': operations error at lib/ldb-samba/ldb_ildap.c:923 my smb.conf settings are passdb backend =

Hi, I am trying to get some integration tests running in CI with a software uses samba4 AD for authentication. So basically I would like spin up a build and provision a samba4 AD with some test users and groups non-interactively and test commits and pull requests against the AD. On 11/14/19 8:16 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 06:19 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah via samba wrote:

Rowland and Michael... Thanks for the help - it sounds like I should be close to getting this working. More troubleshooting... Here is what my test Samba AD has after being freshly provisioned: [drwxr-xr-x root???? root??? ] /var/lib/samba/sysvol/sambatest327.com/Policies ??? [drwxr-xr-x root???? root??? ] {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} ??? ??? [-rwxrwx--- root???? 3000000 ]?

Hi there, from time to time my PC panics when I insert an empty DVD or CD-R. The kernel locks up instantly after the DVD writer's tray is closed. It seems burning the first DVD isn't critical but inserting the second one seems susceptible. I use k3b as software, which polls the hardware while the tray is open, maybe it's something with hald. Don't know, just use this. I

I'm unable to join a new DC to our existing domain after following the instructions on the wiki: # samba-tool domain join company.net DC -U"COMPANY\Administrator" INFO 2025-04-21 18:54:27,655 pid:1090 /usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/samba/join.py #106: Finding a writeable DC for domain 'company.net' INFO 2025-04-21 18:54:27,664 pid:1090

Hello, I'm running a Samba 4.3.3 install on FreeBSD 8.4 (ZFS) in domain mode with passdb tdb backend. The databases and config files are the current versions of an install that I think started in the 1.9.x version range back in the late 90s (I can't remember exactly--it's been a long time!) and smbpasswd days. I'm now trying to convert to an AD install using the classicupgrade

On my small, one DC AD setup, where I just followed the wiki and did not (!) make any other changes except for working on the AD through the RSAT, I ran samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and got the following output: --------------------snip-------------------- ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory

I decided to restart the provisioning process. I stopped the samba_server, deleted /usr/local/etc/smb4.conf and /var/db/samba4. I then decided to do an interactive provisioning and this is the result: [root at smb4-1 ~ (master)]# ll /var/samba4 ; ll /usr/local/etc/smb4.conf ls: /var/samba4: No such file or directory ls: /usr/local/etc/smb4.conf: No such file or directory [root at smb4-1 ~

Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> Hi to all, >> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports >> (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors >> with the

Command: samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/etc/samba.PDC/ --realm=nemuh.cz -- dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ /etc/samba.PDC/smb.PDC.conf ...a lot of lines... and: Following names are both user names and group names:    radix    lekarna    vema    dss    vydejzp    nagios    doprava    audio ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError:

Hi at all, i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some time ago from an nt4-domain. By trying samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ i get the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/samba_upgradedns", line 262, in <module> paths, lp.configfile, lp) File

On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> >> >> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>> Hi to all, >>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >>> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports

Hi everyone archlinux Release: 2014.06.01 using the information on https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Samba_4_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller to install my Active Directory Domain Controller :- samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive --use-xattrs=yes Realm [LOCALDOMAIN]: SAT.CO.UK Domain [SAT]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL,

On 16/01/2023 18:56, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> >>> >>> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>>> Hi to all, >>>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the

Can anyone explain what is happening when I run / usr / local / samba / bin / samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it and an error? ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO file /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tdsfs01.net/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Scripts/scripts.ini