similar to: [Bridge] Transparently bridge Vlans to eth0

Hello all, I have a CentOS box that has a NIC (eth0) on which I defined 4 VLAN's (counting the NIC itself): eth0, eth0.1, eth0.2 and eht0.3. Initially the Cisco switch was not partitioned into VLAN's which means that the only VLAN running on it was the default one (VLAN 1). I have then played with VLAN's a bit on the switch and at this point have two: VLAN 1 (which is default and can

<I apologize if this arrives twice... I sent it first from an non-subscribed address, don't know if that'll get to the list or not --JJ> Hi folks, I have an implementation question regarding bridging on a linux box between a catalyst trunk port and a cisco 26something w/802.1q subinterfaces. So right now, there's no vlan trunking going on on the link my bridging firewall sits

Hi all, i need config xen with this ___________ __________ |VM1 |----------------bridge1-------------------| | |__________ | | | ____________ | |-----BALBLA |VM2 |

Hello, I am creating a configuration where a Redhat server running bridge-tools 0.9.5 will be bridging between different VLANs on the same physical interface (for example: a bridge consisting of eth1.100 and eth1.110). This physical interface is being connected to modern Cisco switches running PVST+. The Cisco switch does not like this configuration as the tags on its BPDUs are being changed

Hello to everybody, Sorry if my english isn?t very good. I need pass 802.1q through a VPN between two offices. I have mounted a WRT54GL, with OpenWRT firmware, conected to a switch trunk port in both offices. In the switch of the first office I have created five tagged VLANs and I need pass these VLAN to the second offices where it has created it too. Can I do this with Tinc in HUB/Switch

I just added 802.1Q VLAN support to redhat initscripts. And after support was ready, I tried to restart shorewall. Well it blew into pieces. Seems like shorewall can''t handle device names like: eth0.3 very properly. That''s default naming of vlan devices. eth1 is master device and 3 is id of my test vlan. So when I added to interfaces line: home eth0.3 detect seems like

As part of my initial KVM host on C8 deployment, I decided to set up some HA features on the new host, specifically NIC teaming. Teaming seems to be bond++ of a sort, so I thought I would at least try it.? So here's the scenario: 1.) Server with two gigabit ethernet ports, two Cisco switches. 2.) During install, used the 'Server with GUI' group and added the virtualization

Hello. I''m trying to use vlan in domU, but have something strange: I created bridge on eth0. This interface was configured as trunk with vlan 300, 301. I use this bridge in my domU, and I can see tagged packets when run tcpdump in domU. Also I created interface on domU to work with vlan 300. On this interface I see untagged packets in vlan300. And everything looks fine. But when

Here are some notes I have about Linux bridging. I''ll try to separate what I know I know from what I think I know. Let''s say I want to bridge eth0, eth1, and eth2 together, all with an IP Address of, say, 1.2.3.2. This is how to do it: echo "Setting up br0 to bridge eth0 with eth1 and eth2" /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br0 /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 eth0

I know this is not a normal request, but I would like to connect two vlans into the same box that have the same subnet on them, and then NAT them out to the Internet. We don''t need to make any connections inbound to them, but only provide outbound access. Any suggestions on how to do this? If I can''t do it with routing then I could use something like user-mode Linux, or other

Hi to the ML. I''m new to VLAN configuration, and combining it to XEN is a bit difficult. I want to use VLAN because it''s possible to "arping" from a domU to an other, and VLAN looks like; the only solution to prevent that. May be I''m wrong if someone got a solution, I may be interrested. I''ve also tryed ebtables, but nothing to prevent arp

Hi, this is my Linux Box ---------------------------- LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | | \ | | eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link | / | LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 | ---------------------------- I have to bridge the 2 lans

This one is really throwing me. Thanks in advance for any advice. I''m working on a 4 port firewall system. It is running heartbeat+drbd. Primary box looks like this: eth0 -> net/cicso router 192.168.144.2/29 eth1 -> drbd/heartbeat crossover cable 192.168.254.253/30 eth2 -> dmz 192.168.144.10/24 eth3 -> loc 192.168.101.2/24 The IP''s

Hi! I''m doing load balancing for 5 dsl lines, each one with a dsl router attached to a linux machine ethernet plug. The problem is that I''m adding 15 more dsl lines, and I don''t have enough PCI slots in the linux machine to sum up 20 ethernet plugs (I already have 2 quad ethernet cards). So I''m considering connecting all dsl routers and the linux machine to a

Hello, does someone could explain me what means this message : query_name_response: Multiple (2).... example : samba4 nmbd[88458]: query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 192.168.151.237 for name SAMBA_DOMAIN<1d>. samba4 nmbd[88458]: This response was from IP 192.168.152.237, reporting an IP address of 192.168.152.237. The server has 3 nic (vlans)

Hi, I'm trying to use rsync to backup a linux filesystem to a windows server. I followed the hints that I found at http://www.tiarnan.phlegethon.org/rsyncntdoc.html to run rsync on windows, and it works quite well. The only problem I found is that windows is not able to backup linux special files (/dev/*). I don't know if the problem is in the way rsync has been compiled, or simply in

Hi, this is probably a very newbie statistical question. I have some experimental data. My hypothesis is that the data are binomially distributed with a known N and p. I am trying to obtain a sort of p-value to tell me whether or not my hypothesis is correct. What can I do with R? Thank you, Pier Luca

Hello list, I've posted here about this before, but I realise that it may have been assumed that the bridged vlans simply put a switch port in a blocking state and left my question ignored. So to recap. I have two tg3 interfaces named 'in' and 'out' and a bridge named 'br0' My vlan trunk is on the 'in' side of the network, and set as in.2, in.3 ... The

Hi. I'm pretty new to ocfs2 and clusters. I'm trying to make ocfs2 running over a drbd device. I know it's not the best solution but for now i must deal with this. I set up drbd and work perfectly. I set up ocfs and i'm not able to make it to work. /etc/init.d/o2cb status: Module "configfs": Loaded Filesystem "configfs": Mounted Module

Running shorewall 3.0.6, Linux 2.6.16, iptables 1.3.0. This firewall has eth1 facing the DMZ and eth0 is a 802.1q trunk with 6 VLANs and zones on it. I would like to allow one subnet living out beyond the DMZ to have access to all zones on this firewall. It seemed that creating a zone would allow for this to be done cleanly via a line in the policy file. I defined this special subnet as the