similar to: [Bridge] bridge + squid

Hi, I am running squid as a TRANSEPARENT PROXY WITH SQUID 2.5 on CENTOS 4.5. Pls see below for squid.con file. http_port 3128 cache_mem 64 MB cache_dir ufs /var/spool/squid 100 16 256 cache_access_log /var/log/squid/access.log cache_log /var/log/squid/cache.log cache_store_log /var/log/squid/store.log # INSERT YOUR OWN RULE(S) HERE TO ALLOW ACCESS FROM YOUR CLIENTS # Example rule

hey friends, I am trying to configure Squid Transparent Proxy on Centos4.0. The eth0 is connected to the Internet and eth1 is for the LAN connection I am testing this scenario with 2 machines one machine (Centos4.0 ) on which squid is running and other machine which is debian is on the network 192.168.2.0. Centos4.0 eth0: 192.168.1.125/24 eth1: 192.168.2.126/24 Debian: eth0:

Hi all, (not sure that this is the right places where send this. sorry) I think that http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html must be updated. The current SQUID version (2.6) don''t support anymore the ''httpd_accel'' directives. So anyone that would follow this guide for configure a transparent proxy will receive an error 400. Please modify the guide as

Hi ALL, I want to setup Transpaent Proxy on the box running iptables Firewall. With iptables, I have given below rules. iptables -F INPUT iptables -F OUTPUT iptables -F FORWARD iptables -F -t nat iptables -F -t mangle #Enabling ip forwarding echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward #enable syn cookies (prevent against the common 'syn flood attack') echo "1"

Hi everybody. We are running Shorewall and Squid on Suse on the same box. Each is working fine independently, but we can''t get them to cooperate. The access log in squid shows no requests when Shorewall is on. Here are all the changes we made in the configuration files. Everything else is the same. We have read through the mailing list and the guide, but still haven''t figured it

hello, my name is Denny. I am new in this list. I am trying use multiple uplinks as describe in the lartc documentation (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) with squid transparent proxy in my gateway server. let me draw the configuration : /----------------- -----DSL1-----| \ |Transparent proxy |----Local network -----DSL2-----|

Hi, I followed the instructions in the section "Squid (transparent) Running on the Firewall" on http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html to setup Squid transparently on a Linux gateway. My net is as follows: loc subnet --- fw Linux Gateway --- ADSL router 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.1.92 (eth1) WAN.WAN.WAN.2 (gw = WAN.WAN.WAN.WAN (eth0) 192.168.1.92) (gw =

Thanks to everyone for all the help getting this done. As promised, here are the detailed notes I put together. These step by step instructions should work starting with a raw RedHat Linux 9.0 system. - Greg Scott GregScott@InfraSupportEtc.com These are step by step instructions for how to install and configure the Squid proxy server with transparent authentication for users in a

Hi all, is it possible configure Shorewall in bridge mode and, in the same box, utilize Squid in transparent mode? I''m triing to do this, but the REDIRECT rule doesn''t work. I''ve already read http://www.shorewall.net/bridge.html to configure the bridge and work fine for me, but when I add the rule for transparent proxy

Hi, guys I am new to linux and iptables/ebtables =========================== My network is as follows LAN IP1 : 10.10.3.25 Web Server BRIDGE : Bridge + Squid + Firewall Which is between IP1 and IP2 which is given IP and Defuault Gateways for this is 192.168.1.1 IP2 : 10.10.3.61 Normal Machine Acting as Clinet If I enable Squid, I am unable to acces web on IP1. =========================== How

any comments? if nothing else, is there any way to atomically setup bridge? not on list, please cc. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:08:15 -0000 From: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk> To: Adam Sulmicki <adam@cfar.umd.edu>, xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] nfsroot and brige > hello, > it seems like a catch-22 to

When vlan device is configured on top of the brige, it does not support any offload capabilities because the bridge device does not initiliaze vlan_fatures. Set vlan_fatures to be equivalent to hw_fatures. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic at redhat.com> --- net/bridge/br_device.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_device.c

Hi, I have used bridge-utils 0.9.6 so far in a kernel 2.4.26, uClibc and ppc environment. When I use version 1.0.3 I have the problem that I do not see the brige with the 'brctl show' command if it is not fully set up. It was working with 0.9.6. I tracked the problem down to an 'incompatibility' in bridge/uClibc/kernel. 0.9.6 uses its own if_indextoname function which uses the

Hello. I''m trying to set up hvm for linux or windows. I start with a very simple configuration without disks at all. but the virtual machine does boot or even "power up". If i remove the ioemu from the network device and specify type=brige or type=route everything goes fine, the boot process is starting but then I cant get network working in the guest.

Say, I''ve found a fairly reproducible error: If you have ethernet aliases, when you first start xend (I use /etc/init.d/xend start) your brige fails to initialize properly. However on the exact same build/hardware/server removing the aliases produced a solid server for both domain0 and domain1 I tried to fix the bridge with "brctl addif xen-br0 eth0" and that would work, but

Hi I need to know if Asterisk supports the full features of the SIP REFER message (i.e blind and supervised transfers). I'm trying to do a supervised transfer through Asterisk from a VoiceXML application using the <transfer> tag and setting bridge="true" (i.e <transfer name="transfer1" bridge="true" connecttimeout="10s"> ) but as soon as

Hello Yazeed, Am Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:26:55 +0300 schrieb Yazeed Fataar <yazeedfataar at gmail.com>: > [..] > > *Site 1* > Server -ping- Site 1 (tinc-srv01) - Success > Server -ping- Site 2 (tinc-srv02) - Success > Server -ping- Site 2 - Server 2 - Failure > > > *Site 2* > Server -ping- Site 2 (tinc-srv02) - Success > Server -ping- Site 1 (tinc-srv01) -

Hi, I''m new to XEN and have the following Problem: If I shutdown my domU the network of the dom0 leaks. A ping from another server to my xen dom0 shows a Packetloss > 80%. Then if I restart the domU after some seconds the ping show a loss from 0%. I retryed that 3 times but it is really hard to go to the dom0 via ssh and recreate the domU if the packetloss is that high. I used google

Hi Lars Thank you for reply. My apologies it is running in "*TAP*" mode. root at tinc-srv:~# tincd -n netname -D -d3 tincd 1.0.23 (Dec 5 2013 17:16:47) starting, debug level 3 /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tap mode) I have enabled ip forwarding and it seems that bridging rules is enabled root at tinc-srv02:~# cat /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables 1 root at

Hello all, I have compiled the latest samba release (3.0.249 on a RedHat AS 4.0 platform with the following options : ./configure &#8722;&#8722;with&#8722;smbwrapper &#8722;&#8722;with&#8722;dce&#8722;dfs &#8722;&#8722;with&#8722;smbmount &#8722;&#8722;with&#8722;pam &#8722;&#8722;with&#8722;pam_smbpass