similar to: [Bridge] how to install

Hi I have been using Shorewall for a while now and find it very useful and easy to configure, I am learning iptables and having trouble getting the bridge to successfully work with squid, although I get it working with Shorewall straight away? Does anyone know the rules to successfully use squid with a transparent bridge? Internet – router - (bridge eth0 – eth1) – local lan auto lo iface lo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Is there a way to prevent hwaddr/mac address spoofing between DomU''s? So in a way ''binding'' a mac-address on boot time with a virtual interface? (with something like ebtables/arptables/etc?) Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -

Hello list, I've posted here about this before, but I realise that it may have been assumed that the bridged vlans simply put a switch port in a blocking state and left my question ignored. So to recap. I have two tg3 interfaces named 'in' and 'out' and a bridge named 'br0' My vlan trunk is on the 'in' side of the network, and set as in.2, in.3 ... The

The university is like a ISP to give access to Internet to several faculties, but we want to restrict the traffic, we needed a traffic shaper to do this, I wanted to have something like (Packeteer INTEL NETSTRUCTURE 7370 aplication server) which it is a bridge where I not need IP for my networks cards. somebody knows one good one to work it on Linux? Regards.

Hello all! I try to use network filters for openvswitch interfaces.  This is the xml configuration of my bridge interface <interface type='bridge'>    <mac address='00:11:22:33:44:55'/>    <source bridge='virbr1'/>    <virtualport type='openvswitch'>         <parameters interfaceid='0529d6b5-627c-4330-803f-0d7018e6d496'/>   

Hello, I am trying to run Xen 3 on FC5, but I cannot have the eth0 interface appear in domU. I have 3 servers running FC3 and Xen 2 with various domUs since a year. Everything is fine on that front. I took one of the server, upgraded it to FC5 and did the following: - yum install xen kernel-xen0 kernel-xenU - grub.conf contains title Fedora Core (2.6.15-1.2054_FC5xen0 root (hd0,0) kernel

Hi, I am trying to set up a bridge that connects 2 user mode linux (UML) machines. The bridge lets ARP traffic through, but not the IP traffic. linux:~ # brctl showmacs br0 port no mac addr is local? ageing timer 2 00:ff:7d:86:06:47 yes 0.00 3 00:ff:bc:de:07:76 yes 0.00 2 fe:fd:c0:a8:00:03 no

<I apologize if this arrives twice... I sent it first from an non-subscribed address, don't know if that'll get to the list or not --JJ> Hi folks, I have an implementation question regarding bridging on a linux box between a catalyst trunk port and a cisco 26something w/802.1q subinterfaces. So right now, there's no vlan trunking going on on the link my bridging firewall sits

Here are some notes I have about Linux bridging. I''ll try to separate what I know I know from what I think I know. Let''s say I want to bridge eth0, eth1, and eth2 together, all with an IP Address of, say, 1.2.3.2. This is how to do it: echo "Setting up br0 to bridge eth0 with eth1 and eth2" /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br0 /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 eth0

Hi all, I have a bridging firewall running fine with kernel 2.4.31 (Slackware 10.1) and iptables 1.2.11 Yesterday I install the new kernel 2.6.14.3 and iptables 1.3.4 but the bridging firewall doesn't work anymore. Do I need to patch the kernel 2.6 as what I did it for kernel 2.4? Or what I have missed? Regards, ro0ot

Hello all, I am new to Linux Ethernet bridging. Let me first start with what I am trying to achieve. Well you see - I am attempting to have 2 main firewall running at the same time - one as a master and the other one as a slave. Yes, I would like to make use of Ethernet bridging in this scenario - as I understand it, all I need are two machines and STP enabled. I am running Debian

Hey folks; I have been happily using shorewall for quite some time so this problem _may_ not be easy to resolve but I am interested in any information regarding your experience with the same setup. I was using FC3 with shorewall 2.2.3 and two NICs setup as a bridge without any issue until I upgraded to FC4. My production system would pass traffic through the bridge but local usage would not

hello i am a new user for this group. i am working at a ISP. here i want to made a bridge firewall i am using fedora core 3. i want to block a serirs of ip address 192.16.18.0/255.255.255.0 and want to give the accesss only 172.16.18.0/255.255.255.0. but iptables not be able to block ip;s its passes all the ip series. i made my machine as bridge. i think my bridge passes all the

While using the linux bridge module in 2.6.10, the kernel seems to munge the source IP address of broadcast UDP packets if they come from "0.0.0.1", and sticks on an address of the linux host. I humbly submit that re-writing the source address of packets is not proper behavior for a bridge, even if those source addresses are not traditionally valid. Sure, 0.0.0.1 isn't a valid

Hello again: I''m hoping that somebody, anybody, can help with this question. How do I make sure that records in a join model are unique? Using the scenario outlined in Chad Fowler''s "Rails Recipies", number 16, "Many to Many Relationships Where the Relationship Iteself Has Data". Here are the tables: create_table :magazines do |t| t.column :title,

******************************************************************** * PLEASE SAVE THIS WELCOME MESSAGE! * ******************************************************************** Welcome to linux-mag-news! This list is for the monthly Linux Magazine newsletter. SUBSCRIBING: Send a blank message to: join-linux-mag-news@sand.lyris.net UNSUBSCRIBING: Send a message

Hi All, I''m trying to do some traffic shaping on an ethernet bridge. Currently, I have the following setup working: ifconfig eth0 down brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1 brctl stp br0 off ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig br0 up This creates a bridge consisting of eth0 and eth1. So far so good. I now want to use tc to shape traffic

The network-bridge script fails when setting a few sysctls which are only available if ebtables is present in the host kernel. Fix by ignoring the return value of the sysctl command. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> Index: xen/tools/examples/network-bridge =================================================================== --- xen/tools/examples/network-bridge (revision 991)

Hello, I am running into a strange problem here. I wrote you a mail earlier also regarding this. 1. I am trying to run the bridge mode over Redhat 7.3 (kernel 2.4.18). I tried the latest version of brdige mode utility and also I tried version 0.94 as well. But whenever I run the brdige mode on this kernel - the kernel goes panic saying "aiee - killing interrupt handler". Now I am in a

Hi, I'm relatively new to linux world.I'm just trying to setup a bridge firewall between a router and LAN. I've installed Red Hat Linux 9.0 - 2.4.20-8 from installation CDs and upgraded to 2.4.25 successfully. I've patched my kernel to support bridge firewall also loaded ebtables module,so far so good.Now I tried to create a bridge using the code given in the following link