similar to: [Bridge] One NIC not bridging?

I four nodes setup to do active-backup bonding and the drivers loaded for the bonded network interfaces vary between tg3 and e100. All interfaces with the e100 driver loaded report errors much like what you see here: bonding: bond0: link status definitely down for interface eth2, disabling it e100: eth2: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for

Hi, ppl, I am using kernel 2.4.25 and having this peculiar problem on my ixp425. When i have 2 ethernet ports of the board connected to the same linksys switch running STP. ixp0 and ixp1 are the name of my ethernet ports enslaved to the same bridge( br0)and my PC is also connected to the switch. IXP425 -br0 (192.168.2.1) |_ixp0|--- |

Hi bridge list: Bart de Schuymer suggested that this question might be better placed on this list rather than in the ebtables area. So here it is : ================================================================= Hi listers: I am a relative Penquin Newcomer, and I am (therefore?) encountering problems trying to setup a simple bridge/firewall between two vlans sharing portions of the same

I hope someone can enlighten me. I have a quad-port Intel 82580 nic (igb driver) on my system and I''d like to dedicate each nic to a HVM via VT-d PCI passthrough. The IOMMU on my system seems to work, I can assign the PCI devices to my HVMs. The HVMs see the pci device and load their respective igb drivers, and ethtool -i eth0 works on each HVM, shows the drivers are loaded and the

Hello all, I'm trying to bridge the wlan0 and eth0 on an embedded system. I used the following commands to setup the bridge: ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 promiscuous ifconfig wlan0 0.0.0.0 promiscuous brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 wlan0 brctl sethello br0 1 brctl setmaxage br0 4 brctl setfd br0 4 ifconfig br0 up The eth0 is connected to a local network, and wlan0 is set to

Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:43:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [libvirt] Problem with Open vSwitch and dnsmasq From: aatteka at nicira.com To: dano1988 at hotmail.it CC: libvir-list at redhat.com; roberto.sassu at polito.it; paolo.smiraglia at polito.it; dev at openvswitch.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniele Milani <dano1988 at hotmail.it> wrote: I think I could try the first solution.

Just responding in case this may be of help to somebody with firewalling issues. Not sure if this is off on a tangent to the original question... Here are three different forms of common firewall scripts and ways of getting SIP to work behind them. The third one has some additional stuff beyond just SIP although I can't remember why I wrote it that way. I've been having no fun using

(Cc'ing to libvirt-users at redhat.com) On 03/22/2012 02:43 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniele Milani <dano1988 at hotmail.it > <mailto:dano1988 at hotmail.it>> wrote: > > I think I could try the first solution. Can you explain me how do > I create the port used by dnsmasq? > > For example, is it correct

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

Could the problem be that the e100 can do IP receive checksumming on the board, but the eepro driver doesn't enable it. When the board is doing checksum offload, then the csum field isn't set. Please try disabling receive checksumming on the e100 driver modprobe e100 XsumRX=0 If this is the problem, it exists both 2.4 and 2.6. On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 18:24:57 +0200 Hannes Schulz

So a 70-persistent-net.rules like # onboard port 1 -> eth0 ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", BUS=="pci", ID=="0000:00:19.0", NAME="eth0" # PCIe card -> eth2 ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", BUS=="pci", ID=="0000:03:00.0", NAME="eth2" # onboard port 2 -> eth1 ACTION=="add",

So I'm back to this problem. A quick run down of what the original problem was: I have a machine that I'm configuring to use kickstart to setup. It has two builtin ethernet ports (labeled ports 1 and 2) and I'm adding a third one on its PCIe bus. Originally I was using an r8169 clone a default kickstart always put it as eth0 with the builtin ones as eth1 and eth2 respectively. After

another identical machine will have the same bus ids. that's why this works. Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289 Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382 DealMax Pty Ltd GitHub: @tartansandal Suite 1416 401 Docklands Drive Docklands VIC 3008 Australia "All parts should go together without forcing. You must

Hi All, I have a thin cliente here that i want to run asterisk: - National Semicondudor Geode GX1 266MHz Geode 266MHz single chip - NS Cx5530a Southbridge National Semiconductors SC2200 - NS PC97317 in chipset - 32MB Compact Flash - 64MB Ram - 10/100Mbps, Autosense 10/100Mbps, Autosense Realtek 8139C National DP83815 / DP83816 Some tip? I have a ide>flash

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

Actually, I know what the MAC is for the builtin Port1 and 2. Those are listed in the BIOS. But ultimately I don't want to rely on them as I want the same kickstart file to work for other machines, so hardcoding those in the kickstart file wouldn't quite work, unless I start writing multiple kickstart files, one per machine. Anyway, lspci reports this: 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel

Right, I understand that part. However I believe I'm now in the realm of making this specific to this machine as I have no guarantee that another identical machine will pop up with those same bus IDs. Maybe for the internal ports, but I don't know if the same will happen for the PCIe bus. Would that be correct? On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Kahlil Hodgson < kahlil.hodgson at

Hi all, I ave setup a CentOS server to act as LAN gateway and also as a transparent proxy server but all client "passing through" that server are enable to send or recieve mails. The mail server is host on the same LAN running mdaemon, both servers are on private IP block(192.168.0.0/24). Am using cisco router to do port forwading for mailserver(25,110,143) ports. If i eliminate

On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > > seeing if things