similar to: [Bridge] Bridge Performance 2

Dear list-members! I am using OpenWRT (www.openwrt.org) on two accesspoints. Within OpenWRT, the wireless interface and the ethernet interface are bridged to one interface (br0). Those two accesspoints are standing quite far from one another. Their WLAN-cells do not cross each other, meaning I have an area in between the two accesspoints, where there is no accesspoint of the two accessible: a

[desktop] ----- lan ----eth0 [notebook] eth1 192.168.?.? ` ----- wlan ---- [speedport(hub and router)] -- internet 192.168.2.x So on my laptop I have eth0 beeing lan, eth1 beeing wlan ethernet card. When only using eth0/1 everything is fine. Now I want to be able to use internet from both [desktop] and [notebook]. Typically you set up a bridge with

Hi! I have some problems with an bridge between wlan0 and eth0 device... It works and I can from both sides ping the router with the bridge device but I cant ping the devices from other net so I cant ping wlan devs from eth net and other way around the wlan card is an atmel usbw11 from linksys and eth is a intel e100 10/100mbit nic I have configured the bridge according to the how to and

So, I'm setting up my first bridge, and I'm running into an interesting issue. I have a 4 port NIC (formerly 4 seperate /29 and /28 LANs) and an onboard NIC (to my ISP). I've setup the bridge using the script included at the bottom of this email (modified from Gentoo for Aurora). When the WET11 (the WET11 is a simple ethernet to wireless bridge) is unplugged, the bridge works

Dr. Tweedie, et al.: I recently formatted a partition using EXT3, and after a "df -h" I get 14GB of space. When I reformatted the partition with ReiserFS, and did a "df -h" I got 16GB of space! Now the partition was setup to be 16GB via fdisk, so 16GB is correct. However, why does EXT3 loose 2GB of space? The journals cannot be that big!?! Very Respectfully, Stuart

Hi all, Can anyone explain me why we need all this per port state information. A bridge port seems to be either in BR_STATE_LISTENING, BR_STATE_LEARNING or BR_STATE_FORWARDING. I don't get it, thought the bridge is learning from MAC addresses of the received packets, therefore while listening. Why a bridge port distinquishes these states? Thanx, Patrick

Hi there, I got a question regarding throughput performance using linux 2.4.5.1. My setup is very simple : I have two laptops with a wireless card. On each laptop I configure the wireless cards to be in ad hoc mode, create a bridge and include the interface within the bridge (stp is off). Then of course I'm assigning an IP address to the bridge while assigning 0.0.0.0 to the wireless

I've seen this come up on occassion, but every NAS OEM that uses NVRAM I've ever talked to over the last 18 months won't tell me anything about their equipment nor their suppliers. Recently, Micro Memory contacted me. Is anyone here using their products? FYI, their 64-bit PCI 128MB-1GB NVRAM board is here:

Greetings, I have a server I'm working on here with two tdm cards in it. 4 FXS and 4FX0. Both cards work fine on their own. The problem lies with using both in the system at once. I have verified the IRQ's are fine. I have tried switching the slots the cards reside in, no luck though. I am using ACPI but not APM. I am using gentoo latest, with vanilla 2.6(.10) kernel and udev. CVS as of

Hello, I'm using a defualt everything install of 7.2 (kernel 2.4.7-10 #1) with a 27 gig ext3 / partition. The problem that I am experiencing is this: If I create more than (about) 3.5 million distinct files on the partition, touch, mkdir, cp and all other file creation methods complain that there is no available space on the disk. A df shows me that the partition is only 65% full.

Hello, first of all, thanks to everyone who has responded to my questions lately. All pointers are as always much appreciated. That said, I have now narrowed down (and solved, sort of) the problem with the mysterious "freeze effect"[1] I've been posting about. To put it in short terms: X = original smb.conf that's worked fine for a long time up until a power outtage efter

Just posted: http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/nfs_and_zfs_a_fine ____________________________________________________________________________________ Performance, Availability & Architecture Engineering Roch Bourbonnais Sun Microsystems, Icnc-Grenoble Senior Performance Analyst 180, Avenue De L''Europe, 38330, Montbonnot Saint

I just want to limit bandwidth on a particular link. Specifically, one machine (PC1) is on wired LAN and other (PC1) on a WLAN, acess point for which is on the same LAN. Both machines have static ip addresses (AD1 and AD2) and I want to limit the bandwidth utilization of certain udp traffic from PC2 to PC1. Is is possible to do this using iptables and tc (controlling from PC1 as that has both

Hi all, let me see if I can explain my problem in an explicable way. I have written a WLAN driver which runs on a dedicated box (e.g. not a PCMCIA card). The box is plugged into a client that wants WLAN connectivity via Ethernet. E.g.: [ ] Ethernet [ ] RF/WLAN [ Laptop ]------------------[ WLAN adapter ]------------- [ ] [ ]

Hallo, can I use pxelinux for booting a notebook via WLAN? Viele Gruesse! Helmut

Hello, In one of our project we need to connect one IMX 27 based baord which ahs a internal FEC controller & an MPC 8323RDb baord which has a Built in Network controller. We need to connect the IMX27 based board to MPC board thro cross cable & MPC baord has wlan AP card . Basically we want to communicate from IMX27 to wireless network. Hence we are planning to make follwoing arranage

tinc 1.0.19 worked fine on Raspberry Pi as long as my Pi was connected via ethernet cable. Today i changed the connection to wlan. Pi crashed. worse, it was no longer operational, even if connected via cable. recovery from backup before tinc was installed (yes, i had a backup ;) tried again. installed tinc: worked as long as connected via cable. crash after connecting via wlan. no longer

Hi folks! First post here, so please don't bother if it's not the right place to post those kind of questions. I'm currently running a 4.7-release (upgrade to 4.8 planned but not yet started) on my production box. As I would like to setup a small WLAN (major use for my notebook, other clients are possible) I need to know which cards are really supported. The handbook is IMHO not

Well I think we all need to look at something like this first. We will be one of the first people in Europe who will be selling this. If anyone is interested do drop me an email. Picture of the phone can be found here. http://cyber-telecom.net/wifi-gsm.jpg GSM / VoIP Over WiFi Dual-Mode Phone CYBER-TELECOM released the world first commercial GSM/VoIP Over WiFi dual-mode smart phone, in

Hi list, I bought two UTStarcom F1000 phones, pre-equipped with the latest firmware, including WPA support. Those are configured to register to an asterisk server on the internet (not LAN), and registration works. Calling and being called also, with transfer and all bells and whistles. After a few minutes up to 5 hours (varies widely), the display tells me that an Accesspoint is not available