similar to: [Bridge] Enable Bridgeing with a unsupported Eth devices

As reported in an earlier thread (http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Disable-memset-synthesis-tp4057810.html), we noticed in some cases that the llvm.memset intrinsic, if lowered to stores, could help with performance. Here's a test case: If LIMIT is > 8, I see that a call to memset is emitted for arm & aarch64, but not for x86 target. typedef struct { int v0[100]; }

Hi all, I'm trying to use mboot.c32 to build our Solaris machines but the problem we are getting is the network interface doesn't get configured. It would boot in to the miniroot and then drops in to a shell. At the shell, if I configure the interface via dhcp it would continue on with the jumpstart. This is the first time we are using syslinux (version 4.04) and looking at the

Hi Some time ago I wrote this mailing list about some extra time that it takes for my system to boot and I don't know where it came from.I'm using a custom BIOS which loads at 1 second and now I've found out that it takes for the bootloader and OS an extra 1 second to load when keyboard is disconnected.I got from the BIOS engineer the following explanation and steps to take: In

Hi, I’m facing a crash issue (--target=arm-linux-gnueabi -march=armv8-a+crc -mfloat-abi=hard) and debugging the problem, I found that an intended branch was not taken due to bad code generation after the Post RA Scheduler pass. A CMPri instruction after an INLINEASM block (which inturn contains a cmp, bne instruction) is being moved before the INLINEASM block incorrectly resulting in two

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Tim Northover via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 15 August 2017 at 19:38, bharathi seshadri via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I find that GCC has an option -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns that > > can be used to disable memcpy/memset synthesis. I wonder if there is > > something similar

Our application is 32-bit big-endian ARM and we use -O3 with LTO. clang optimizes certain initialization of structures to zero with calls to memset, which are not further lowered to move instructions. Investigating perf reports, it looks like it may be beneficial to disable this optimization that introduces a function call to memset in certain hot paths. I tried passing -fno-builtin, but that

I have the following problem with syslinux. With boards with same core chipset and bios, syslinux fails on some boards. The difference on boards are that the ones that succeed has standard PC components (KBC, PATA). The ones that failes have SATA only and no KBC. It does not matter if I boot from USB or Compact flash drive. I has been noted that the bootloader calls BIOS functions for a drive

My concern wasn't a phylosophical one but a pragmatic one. Learning about poor choices when lowering memset is probably quite useful. Having a flag that just turns off idiom recognition for it may just work around the problem. But the problem may still exist. In any case, I'm not fundamentally against such a flag but it just seems like something that could 1. Hide a problem 2. Get a bit

Hi, Does anyone know how to turn on TOE ( TCP offload engine ) and RSS ( Receive-Side Scaling)? Thanks, pete

Dear list, Shorewall is running here with 2 ISP''s: ISP1: corporate ADSL-line with fixed set of IP''s ISP2: fast consumer-grade cable-connection with higher bandwidth All our main traffic (web, e-mail) is routed trough ISP1. Only for special purposes (frequent large ftp-transfers) ISP2 is used, configured trough tcrules. ISP2 is not so reliable as ISP1 (duh) and they sometimes

> we lower llvm.objectsize later than we should Is there a well-accepted best (or even just better) place to lower objectsize? I ask because I sorta fear that these kinds of problems will become more pronounced as llvm.is.constant, which is also lowered in CGP, gains popularity. (To be clear, I think it totally makes sense to lower is.constant and objectsize in the same place. I'm just

I''m planning on dipping my toe into the rails ocean after having lurked here for a bit. From what I gather, rails *WILL* work on a straight CGI based server setup, it''s just slow, right? Since this is going to be for my own enlightenment, I just need to confirm(/deny) it''ll work at all right now; I''ll work on the "fast" later.

Hi everybody - this is an oddball question. I wonder if anybody has programmed any games in R, such as Sudoku, Tic-Tac-Toe and the like. Or even a flight simulator... R mateys! Let's make some t-tests! Regards, David

Hi, I have come across a couple of cases where the code generated after CodeGenPrepare pass has "br i1 false .." with both true and false conditions preserved and this propagates further and remains the same in the final assembly code/executable. In CodeGenPrepare::runOnFunction, ConstantFoldTerminator (which handles the br i1 false condition) is called only once and if after the

Is it possible to make Icecast run, for serving no more than 16 listeners, on Raspberry Pi? I simply want to dip my toe into the Linux universe, and this would be a fine excuse for me to try RP if it's doable. Thanks. Jeremiah Rogers Cell: 704-996-5334 Email: jeremiahzrogers at gmail.com Social Networking: /jzrogers

Last time I checked (but that was a while ago) TOE (TCP Offloading Engine) was not supported very well, at least not with Broadcom chips. Did anything change in that regard recently? More specifically, the chip I'm looking at is Broadcom NetXtreme II 5709 and the distribution is 5.3 Any luck with proprietary drivers? Any problems those drivers may cause with bonding? -- Florin Andrei

Evening folks: Not sure where this fits into the picture so bear with me for a few moments while I think out loud to lay out the particulars of my problem. -would love to be employed using R for a living but so far I have just worked with it on my home machine to develop a basic level of skill with it. -I run Ubuntu linux 8.04 LTS on a machine with a 2.5GHz Celeron processor and 1.2GB of memory.

Hi there, I'm in the process of installing Centos 5.2 on an IBM x236 w/ ServeRAID 7k I recently acquired to act as a samba file server. The hardware has all passed various stress tests I could throw at it so we're okay there. My question is. Has anyone had any luck getting the latest IBM ServeRAID Manager v9.0 working in CentOS? If so how? ServeRAID Manager is based off Adaptec's

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01 Sep 2015, at 16:21 , Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> There used to be changelog of sorts for R-devel [1] and R-release [2]. >> Neither have been updated since 2015-07-24. Have these moved >> elsewhere, or are they no longer

Hi, I've just released v1.0.0 of Virtlyst[1] a web tool to manage VMs using Qt/C++/Cutelyst https://dantti.wordpress.com/2018/04/19/announcing-virtlyst-a-web-interface-to-manage-virtual-machines/ Thanks. 1 - https://github.com/cutelyst/Virtlyst -- Daniel Nicoletti KDE Developer - http://dantti.wordpress.com