similar to: [Bridge] bridge running slow

Hi All, Today is a great day. My hotmail login error is fixed. Following Peter's advice, I used e1000 card, don't change any MTU , the hotmail login error went away! It is MTU issue, for VLAN tag traffice going through the bridge, the NICs in the bridge need support VLAN tag, e100/e1000 card can. Thanks to Peter, Stephen Hemminger, and All ! So far I know Intel e100/e1000 card can

Hi, I recently upgraded the kernel in my Debian server from 2.4.22 to 2.6.9. This server acts as router and has an ethernet bridge (br0) that combines eth1 and eth2. Each of these two network cards is connected to one Windows PC. Since I booted kernel 2.6.9 it takes more than one minute for a client pc to receive its IP address when that one starts up. I noticed that the kernel messages (shown

Hi. I am use a linux bridge with two via-rhine ethernet cards. I have aprox. the 3% of packet loss in the bridge. This is normal? Is it a possible problem of the via-rhine cards? Is best change the NICs for 3COM? Sincerely Thanks. Daniel.

Hi everybody, Just have myself added into the maillist. I have a few linux boxes with Kernel 2.6.9. Each box has 2 ethernet interfaces, one 3COM, one Intel. I connected one with Power Line Modem, and one with Wifi Modem. They form a nice network with bridge. I have a few questions here. Suppose I have two path from box A to box D, which path will packets go through? If I want to monitor the

----- Original Message Follows ----- From: kasra kangavari <kasra_kng@yahoo.com> To: fulvio.ricciardi@zeroshell.net Subject: Re: [Bridge] Passing vlan tagged packets through linux bridge(2.6.19) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 00:16:12 -0800 (PST) > Dear Fulvio > > I wanna know if your linux box ethernets are 1000 or 100 > ? > and are you sure about kernels < 2.6.15 that large

Hi bridge list: Bart de Schuymer suggested that this question might be better placed on this list rather than in the ebtables area. So here it is : ================================================================= Hi listers: I am a relative Penquin Newcomer, and I am (therefore?) encountering problems trying to setup a simple bridge/firewall between two vlans sharing portions of the same

A detailed description of our status and dilemma is given below... This week I've been on samba.org and searched the MARC mailing list archives for discussions pertinent to our situation. My search for "slow DOS client" produced over 100 hits dating back to the last millennium, some of which were really about something else. Many of the rest were descriptions of problems VERY

Hi, I'm having some problems with kernel panic with the bridge. I have the following network setup: | | +----+----+ | (eth0) | +---------+ | Bridge | | | | (eth1)|<-- Mirror of ---+ Switch | +---------+ +- - - - -+ 1000SX link | |<--1000SX-->| Switch | | | |

I put a bridging firewall together last winter (with some help) and have it= in production in front of a couple windows web and mail servers for going = on 6 months now. I used Fedora C1 with 2.4.22 kernel and 0.9.6 bridge-utils= . The bridge has solved a lot of security headaches. I use a modified start= up script written by David Whitmarsh that has worked really well. http://ww=

On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 11:10 +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:52:18PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 19 May 2023 16:51:48 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote: > > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c > > > index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644 > > > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c > > > +++

On Sun, 9 May 2004 17:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Matthew Tanase <tanase@qaddisin.com> wrote: > Hi > > I have a question for you - I know you probably get a lot but I figured I'd try. I've setup several bridges before using the code. Never had any problems. Recently I set Mandrake 10.0 up on a rackmount, with a builtin NIC and a 4 port ethernet card. Initially, I plugged 2 links

(originally filed as a bug in Fedora's bugzilla, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171933) Greetings, Using Fedora Core 4 on a Dell PE 420sc. Malfunctioning kernel is smp-2.6.13-1.1532_FC4. Properly functioning kernels included smp-2.6.12-1.1456_FC4. Network performance is extremely poor when using bridged network interfaces. When not using brctl, the interface

> Use an Intel pro/100 or pro/1000 driver..they are known to > work with VLANs. > > I guess it's also possible that it's a problem in the > bridging code, so try the latest kernel > as well... I compiled the latest 2.6.19 kernel and tested it with two 3COM 3c905c fast ethernet interfaces which work fine with vlan 802.1q tagging, but when I have added the eth0 and eth1

hi, = i have my wireless LAN card connected in USB port of linux machine at eth= 1, = = and another wireless LAN card connected to USB port of windows machine. = = the LAN card of windows has been plugged out. now, i want to access the = = internet sites on windows machine through the wireless LAN b/w the 2 = = machines. = I have successfully made a bridge

Hi, I use rsync (2.4.6) to mirror some directories from two servers to an another server. The mirroring server is RedHat 6.2 with 2.2.15 kernel. The mirrored servers are: RedHat 6.2 with 2.2.14 kernel / RedHat 6.1 with 2.2.14 (smp). All servers are connected to the same switch and the network is 100Mbit/s. All servers have 3Com 905 nics. With the first mirrored server speed is okay, but the

I'm a problem with bridge please help me My configuration: eth0,eth1,wlan0 bridge is br0 on devices eth0 and wlan0. Device eth1 is not in bridge. br0 ip is 192.168.1.1 eth1 ip is 192.168.2.1 ethernet (eth0,eth1) is in one switch. all is ok if eth1 not in system, if eth1 plugged into system and up interfa= ce eth1 network crash :( thanx. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi all, let me see if I can explain my problem in an explicable way. I have written a WLAN driver which runs on a dedicated box (e.g. not a PCMCIA card). The box is plugged into a client that wants WLAN connectivity via Ethernet. E.g.: [ ] Ethernet [ ] RF/WLAN [ Laptop ]------------------[ WLAN adapter ]------------- [ ] [ ]

Hi there- I think I have a bug to report :-( I'm trying to setup up a bridge for use with OpenVPN on my Gentoo box- resulting in a lot of fiddling and creating/destroying bridges (mostly to do with me getting things right in gentoos network config scripts.) What I've noticed is that when I create br0, and try and add eth0, it says it's already part of a bridge (it isn't - no

Hi all, I'm new to the world of bridging and the mailing list but I am hopeful my initial problems are fairly trivial. I am running the Honeynet Project's rc.firewall script at boot time (on my Sparc running Aurora) but the script is having trouble establishing the bridge. In my logs, I have found the following error: tSIOCSIFADDR : No such device eth1: unknown interface: No such

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 5675 bytes Desc: Clear Day Bkgrd.jpg Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20060515/b39aa4d5/attachment.jpeg