similar to: [Bridge] <kernel BUG> generated on bridge up/down & other issues

Hi there, I'm currently experiencing a minor problem using the bridge module under kernel 2.4.27 part of the Devil Linux distribution (http://www.devil-linux.org). The problem I am having is that when the bridge is unloaded during a reboot I receive the following errors in /var/log/messages: Nov 14 13:22:13 src@Devil kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count =

Hello, I have two hosts with a tunnel closed by vtun, when I reboot a host, the other show the error bellow. unregister_netdevice: waiting for tun0 to become free. Usage count = 6 OS version: CentOS 5.4 Vtund version: vtun-3.0.2-1 some idea about? Thanks -- Daniel Bruno http://danielbruno.eti.br danielbruno at projetofedora.org

hi i've setup the following on debian etch with bridge-utils 1.4 (backported) and kernel 2.6.26 from backports.org: vlan10 with raw device eth0 vlan20 with raw device eth0 br10 with initial port vlan10 br20 with initial port vlan20 i've set hw addr to DE:AD:BE:EF:34:10 for br10 and DE:AD:BE:EF:34:20 for br20 the bridges are used to connect virtual machine nic's. "brctl

With recent 2.6 kernels, the command brctl delbr br0 hangs during shutdown, and the kernel prints this message again and again: unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count = 1 I was able to reproduce this problem with several kernels between (and including) 2.6.9-rc1 and 2.6.11-rc2-bk9. I haven't tried later versions than 2.6.11-rc2-bk9 yet. 2.6.8.1-bk2 still works

I configured a tunnel where the server is a CentOS 5 x86_64 with compress. In the client don't have problem but in the message log of the server show this erro: vtund[15145]: segfault at 0000000000000040 rip 0000000000409774 rsp 00007fff88d548d0 error 4 I did the same configuration on another server, but i686 and had no problems. Packs: vtun-3.0.2-1.el5.rf x86_64 lzo2-2.02-3.el5.rf x86_64

When i want to delete my test bridge, using: ifconfig eth0 down ifconfig eth1 down ifconfig br0 down brctl delif br0 eth0 brctl delif br0 eth1 brctl delbr br0 i get this error message from the kernel on the console: unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count =3D 2 The brctl user-level command is blocked. Could you explain me what could likely be the cause of this error?

Hello, I connected the network 192.168.1.0 with 192.168.2.0 over the internet trough a GRE-Tunnel. I don''t know if I set up all things right: The client-pcs in both networks have a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 and 192.168.2.x''s default gateway is the server wich has started the tunnel. The 192.168.1.x''s default gateway is 192.168.1.250 wich routes traffic destinated to

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Stephen Hemminger, Yes,I use V2.4.17. Which patch can I use? Or can you tell me the reason,so that i can modify my Kernel.I use this kernel at the embeded system. >Haisen.Zhang wrote: > >>shemminger? >> >> I have a problem with brctl application,following is my operations: >> >> vconfig add eth0 3 >> >> brctl addbr br0 >> >>

Hey, I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows: ____ ____ / VM1\______br0_______/ em1\ \____/ | \____/ | _|_ /VM2\ \____/ virbr0 is the virtual network switch VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively. em1 is the default

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:13:33 +0100 ncrfgs <ncrfgs@tin.it> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using the great 802.1d Ethernet Bridging support via > brctl along with Universal TUN/TAP devices created with > openvpn on a GNU system with a vanilla 2.6.8.1 Linux > kernel. > > > To start it: > > /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br${X} > /sbin/ifconfig brX

Package: xen-utils-3.0 Version: 3.0.2+hg9656-1 Severity: normal My setup is a basic one. No changes to the /etc/xen/* files. Network in a domU works perfectly fine. But, after shutdowning a domU, I can see the following lines in /var/log/debug: May 6 10:31:45 vaio logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: offline XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/18/0 May 6 10:31:46 vaio logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge:

On 9/9/20 7:13 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Hello, > > I want to do some testing and I have removed two VM's from the bridge > what connects them to internet, and added them to another isolated > bridge what's not connected to internet. Problem is that I cannot reach > the other host in the isolated network. > > Something like this: > > virsh shutdown

Hello, I have been using the bridging facilities provided by Linux (vanilla 2.6.7 SMP with UML skas host patch applied) to bridge a regular physical ethernet network (on interface eth0) with a virtual network (on interface tap0, cf uml_switch, http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/networking.html). A couple of virtual machines (run using user-mode linux, a tool that enables you to run linux

I've looked around briefly for what options are available for encrypting the media stream using asterisk. I did not see any SRTP support, and it looks like there is some initial work on iax2 encryption, but whether it works is still open for question I guess. I'm also curious of other solutions that could be bolted onto the front end of asterisk to provide encryption, and are there

Hi guys, i use xen3.2. how can i manually create the xenbr0 ? which parameters have i to choose for brctl ? thanks, -- Viele Grüße Dominique Holger Schramm | Linux Administrator http://schwarz-weiss.cc/ | Life between PuTTy and reality http://ihr-linuxadmin.eu/ | Commercial Admin Service _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hello, I thinking about using PCI passthrough to dedicated a domU as firewall. I understand PCI passthrough concept. When done, my domU will see network card and the dom0 won''t any more. So I''ll be able to filter all trafic from outside, since it will go through network domU. Then, how will I be able to connect other domU (and maybe dom0) to the network domU ? In a normal way,

inquiry about differences between the tap and the vnet in the virt-manager Greetings! I encounter a problem about the network when using virt-manager to create and run a VM. when I want to establish a network bridge for the guest OS, I generally use two kinds of ways described as fellow : First method : create a bridge with the help of linux commad: brctl, or Second method : using

Hello, I have the need to connect 2 remote site with vpn, the windows pc of the 2 site it can share the HD and printer. This is my configuration : LOCAL NETWORK A : ip from 192.168.10.2 to 192.168.10.99 | | | | eth0: 192.168.10.1 FIREWALL A : ( with debian ; openvpn ver. 2.0.beta15 ; shorewall ver 2.0.11 ) eth1 : xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ( pubblic ip address ) | | | | INTERNET | | | eth1 :

Hi folks, I've been reading through the list a bit, and also looked at the KVM How-To on the wiki (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM ) but I still have a question. I haven't yet begun to set up KVM, so I haven't made any mistakes yet. :-) My company recently rented a server on which CentOS 5.0 is installed, and my goal is to set up a virtualized instance of CentOS for a new