similar to: [Bridge] Newbie at work - need some advise/guidence please.

Hi all, I have one bridge system (used for controlling bandwidth) connected to three different DSL ISP provider. I have the following setup below: - +-------------+ | br0 | | -> eth1 | -> DSL_1 | -> eth2 | +-------------+ | br1 | | -> eth3 | -> DSL_2 | -> eth4 | +-------------+ | br2 | | -> eth5

I have a 2.6.12(ubuntu-patchset), kernel recompiled with this routing options: [*] IP: advanced router [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath Load balancing is working great, but i have problems whits long term tcp flows (like msn-messenger or vpns or any other type of long term ip based conection). I assume this is because after a period of time, the per-host

Hi, I met a problem when using bridge with netfilter. The kernel version 2.4.20, and the patch is bridge-nf-0.0.10-against-2.4.20.diff. Our firewall configuration is as follows, eth3,eth4,eth5,eth6 configured as a bridge with an IP address 10.0.0.1. The local net connect to the internet via the gateway 10.0.0.1 and SNAT is applied on the firewall. It worked but sometimes there are some

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:59:56 +0200 "Peter M" <peter.mdk@gmail.com> wrote: > The analyzer is a AMD Duron around 1200 MHz and has 128 MB of RAM. Your trying to squeeze blood from a turnip (not tulip) by trying to run 8 interfaces at once on that system. > I can't remember if the crashes only comes when I'm running tcpdumps > on several bridges at a time. But

Hello, I''m new to Xen (and this mailing-list) and facing some problems with the network. I''m stuck and don''t know how to continue. And Google isn''t very helpful either... My setup: - Ubuntu 7.10 for dom0 and Debian 4.0 for all domU - 4 physical NIC (DHCP from my ISP, internal LAN, DMZ & WLAN) - 1 Dom as firewall/router - 1 domU with internal services

Hello newsgroup, I hope somebody with more routing experience then me can help me with the problem I have. The setup is as described below. A dual internet provider routing, multiple local area networks, and a dmz network with one public and one private ip range. I followed the instructions at lartc.org, and so far everything is working. The default route is via

Hi, i have a question if linux is able to do the same thing that commercial wan simulators do (which cost 7000 $ or more). Basicly i want to use the following setup. Linux Router Machine 192.168.0.1 192.168.1.1 Eth0 192.168.10.1 Eth5 192.168.2.1 Eth1 192.168.100.1 WEB Server. 192.168.3.1 Eth2

Hi, Shorewall version -4.0.12-2 (EL5 rpm version) OS : Centos 5.2 I have shorewall successfully running on Linux with multi ISP. Trying to make services such as "rsync, ftp" go through my secondary ISP. For which I did the following eth0 : Internal LAN eth4 : DSL (Second ISP) => x.x eth5 : T1 (First ISP) => y.y Created the following entries in

I have a setup with two Internet providers. One circuit (net0 == eth1) is used primarily for employees and tunnels to other sites. The other (net1 == eth2) is for the production machines that customers access. Everythung works in teh sense that packets get to where they are sent (mostly) but I recently I had a sniffer on the system and noticed a problem I cannot solve. traffic coming in

I have been studying Tom''s configuration at: http://www.shorewall.net/myfiles.htm -and- http://www.shorewall.net/NAT.htm I am using SBC as an ISP and also have 5 "real" IP addresses and because of other issues, have to re-do my set-up. If I have a block at .120/29 assigned to me, what SBC does is give you 5 usable addresses, in my case .121 is the SBC modem/router and

Hello all, I''m using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (with RH Virtualization) and a Dell Poweredge 2950 with 10 NICs. My virtual operating systems are all RHEL4, and I''ve installed 4 instances. I''m trying to set up the virtual operating systems so that the physical NICs are allocated to certain operating systems. Using the following tutorial:

Hello all, I have a Xen server with 6 network interfaces, I want a bridge on all of them. I use a personal network script like this : #!/bin/bash dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=eth0 bridge=xenbr0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@"

Hello, I''m receiving this error while restarting/starting Shorewall : Processing /etc/shorewall/init ... WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan20 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan10 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan30 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan50 WARNING: default route ignored on interface vlan100 My route -n

On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:20, Rafa? Radecki <radecki.rafal at ...> wrote: > Hi All :) > > I have three servers, all with centos 7 installed 3 days ago. I need on > them "old" naming scheme (ethX) for network interfaces, because of that: > > # grep GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX /etc/sysconfig/grub > GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.lvm.lv=centos_node-XY/swap

Hi all, First of all I repost this email in shorewall list as there are a lot of firewall experts here that might know what the hell i going on. We have also posted this on the linux bridge list (we needed acceptance first) and leaf list. Very thankful for your understanding. We are experiencing a very strange problem and would need some help. We have a Leaf / Shorewall based box (actually

Hi All :) I have three servers, all with centos 7 installed 3 days ago. I need on them "old" naming scheme (ethX) for network interfaces, because of that: # grep GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX /etc/sysconfig/grub GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.lvm.lv=centos_node-XY/swap rd.lvm.lv=centos_node-XY/root rhgb quiet ipv6.disable=1 net.ifnames=0" net.ifnames=0 was added and afterwards I ran:

Hi, Sometimes, I found one of my Mellanox NIC renamed to rename6, instead of eth1. The right names of NICs in my system should be: eth0 Mellanox NIC eth1 Mellanox NIC eth2 Intel NIC eth3 Intel NIC eth4 Intel NIC eth5 Intel NIC eth0 and eth1 will combined as bond1 with mode 4. However, the current names are: eth0 Mellanox

Hi i have read the all the docs and try to deploy the load balance and QoS using my 4 links (DSL links) My setup looks like below LAN ----Local IP-----Connected to Linux Box Eth1 Eth5-- connected to one DSL1 Eth4-- connected to one DSL2 Eth3-- connected to one DSL3 Eth2-- connected to one DSL4 iam marking them in prerouting randomly and puting them in table and snating at POSROUTING

All, I've got a machine running CentOS 5.3 and this machine has got 2 - built-in 1 Gig NICs and a expansion card with 4 - 100 Meg NICs. For whatever reason at install time, it made the expansion card eth0 through eth3 and the internal ports eth4 and eth5. And by default the 'machine' is known on the network by the eth0 NIC, so my throughput is limited to 100 Mb. How can I force

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I''ve a problem with the configuration below eth3 - Connection to ISP 1 eth4 - Server Farm Public address (202.73.10.*) eth5 - Local Area Network (192.168.0.0/24) I''m doing this one-to-one NAT because there is a server need to have the public ip and it is located in somewhere that can only be reach by LAN. I''ve