similar to: scanner stopped working to store files on samba-4.21.5

On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 14:21:02 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Losing my mind again ;-) > > A Ricoh MPC-3003 doesn't store scans anymore: > > [2025/04/09 14:12:32.414091, 2] > source3/auth/auth.c:353(auth_check_ntlm_password) > check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [scanner] -> > [scanner]

Am 2017-07-11 um 09:04 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 2017-07-10 um 13:08 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > >> And what does this tell me, please: >> >> [2017/07/10 13:07:48.593400, 1] >> ../source3/auth/token_util.c:430(add_local_groups) >> SID S-1-5-21-2940660672-4062535256-4144655499-1008 -> getpwuid(11008) >> failed

Am 2017-07-11 um 14:00 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> template homedir = /home/%U >> >> works for me in this context, right? > > That should work. edited accordingly, and rm-ed that idmap schema line on DM. I now have on the DM: [global] workgroup = BUERO realm = secret.AT netbios name = SERVER security = ADS map to guest = Bad User username map = /etc/samba/smbusers

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:22:36 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists at xunil.at> wrote: > Am 2017-07-11 um 12:16 schrieb Rowland Penny: > > > Try running this: > > > > ldbsearch -H /path/to/sam.ldb -b "dc=secret,dc=at" -s sub > > "(&(objectclass=user)(uidnumber=11029))" > > > > This will check if it is a user. >

Hey guys, i tried to create a simple rsync script that should create daily backups from a ZFS storage and put them into a timestamp folder. After creating the initial full backup, the following backups should only contain "new data" and the rest will be referenced via hardlinks (-link-dest) This was at least a simple enough scenario to achieve it with my pathetic scripting skills.

Hello I want to add Win7 machine to my Samba PDC with WinXP clients. Google tells me I have to add a .V2 to my profiles. The samba log ask about a .v2 share. Can someone explain me the difference of the v2 extension at the profile names and the roaming profile share? Following my settings: smb.conf: [global] logon path = \\%L\nt-profile logon home = \\%L\nt-profile [nt-profile]

On Wed, 24 May 2017 11:36:07 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > No big change here ... > > I can: > > * logon as BUERO\root > > * connect to the shares on \\dc > > * test other users via smbclient (auth works for them) > > But: > > * login as BUERO\Administrator just sits there and waits for >

Am 2017-07-11 um 14:57 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:47:50 +0200 > "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists at xunil.at> wrote: > >> Am 2017-07-11 um 14:40 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> >>>> Restarted winbind, did "killall -HUP" on smbd and nmbd. >>>> >>>> still can't login to DM via smbclient and that

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:58:14 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists at xunil.at> wrote: > Am 2017-07-11 um 12:51 schrieb Rowland Penny: > > > Well, that explains where '11029' is coming from, you are using the > > 'rid' backend. The users (or group) ID will be calculated using this > > formula: > > > > ID = RID - BASE_RID +

Stefan... You changed the user his password while, I said, change the Adminisitrator password. Let him logout and login again or you monitor his event logs remotely and see what happens if you change the Administrator password. And try this. !root = BUERO\Administrator BUERO\administrator Last question that share, any special settings? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk

On Wed, 24 May 2017 12:39:32 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 2017-05-24 um 11:55 schrieb Rowland Penny: > > On Wed, 24 May 2017 11:36:07 +0200 > > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> No big change here ... > >> > >> I

Am 2017-07-11 um 14:57 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> # smbclient \\\\server\\daten -Usgw%PW >> session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL > > Restart all the Samba binaries on the DM > > Then check that the OS knows your user with: > > getent passwd sgw libnss_winbind was missing! Now both results are the same user-names in /etc/passwd ... rmed now I was 100%

Am 06.08.19 um 15:50 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 06/08/2019 14:44, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> same user uses a share on one of the DCs (yes, I know ... administrative >> small share) >> >> there it is correctly displayed in smbstatus >> >> So I expect some wrong/outdated mapping on the DM/fileserver? >> >> >> > On

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:05:28 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists at xunil.at> wrote: > Am 2017-07-11 um 11:57 schrieb Rowland Penny: > > > Remove this local Unix group, you cannot have a group (or a user) > > in AD and /etc/group > > ok, done > > > Probably because '11029' isn't a 'RID', it will be a uidNumber. > >

Am 2017-07-07 um 18:40 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 2017-07-07 um 14:59 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> Good luck with the migration, if you follow what you did in your tests, >> you should be okay. Unfortunately I will be un-contactable for the >> next two days, but I am sure that you will get help if you require it. > > it looks quite ok, but

Am 2017-07-11 um 12:16 schrieb Rowland Penny: > Try running this: > > ldbsearch -H /path/to/sam.ldb -b "dc=secret,dc=at" -s sub > "(&(objectclass=user)(uidnumber=11029))" > > This will check if it is a user. Did so, no entry returned. -- plus: please note that yesterday all users could work normally .... > Can you post the smb.conf from the DM

Well, it was quiet and stable for quite a while now .. thanks to all the devs ;-) This weekend I upgraded some Debian servers, from Debian 9.12 to 10.4 One of these is a Samba-4.10.15 DC and I didn't touch the samba config at all. Now smbstatus shows uids and gids in smbstatus output: # smbstatus Samba version 4.10.15-Debian PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:19:09 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists at xunil.at> wrote: > Am 2017-07-11 um 14:00 schrieb Rowland Penny: > > >> template homedir = /home/%U > >> > >> works for me in this context, right? > > > > That should work. > > edited accordingly, and rm-ed that idmap schema line on DM. > > I now have on

Am 2017-07-11 um 13:37 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: >> Having everything in AD, gives you the possibility of using different >> Unix home dirs etc per person. > > Not needed. I am the only UNIX user there. > > I only need separate [home] dirs for a group of users: > > some customers of my customer come by to do some work with a specific > software and I want

Am 05.08.19 um 10:41 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 05/08/2019 09:33, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> The saga around the misnamed DC seems over, so let's open a new thread >> ;-) >> >> In the same AD I see this: >> >> in smbstatus I see a smbd-PID for a Username "root", Group "root" >> >> But the actual