similar to: [Bridge] Man-in-the-middle scenario within vmware - problem

Hi there! I'm super-happy because I've just finished my semi-auto configurator for Windows machines ^^ I've got a question: must all the users of a VPN share all together their hosts files? i.e. PC1 is linked to PC2 -> PC1 and PC2 must have both /hosts/PC1 and hosts/PC2 PC2 is linked to PC3 -> PC2 and PC3 must have both /hosts/PC2 and /hosts/PC3 Must PC3 have /hosts/PC1

pc1(LANa) ----poor connection ----> VPS <--------- PC2(LANb) pc1 and pc2 used to connected directly with tinc, since pc1 used to have WAN IP(pppoe), but the pppoe IP is not WAN IP anymore (ISP changed to let all ADSL user in a LAN). if I let the two pc connect to a VPS with tinc, can later connections between pc1 and pc2 be directly ? for example, ssh from pc1 to pc2 but not proxyed by

R version: 1.7.1 OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 When "covmat" is supplied in princomp(), the output value "center" is all NA's, even though the input matrix was indeed centered. I haven't read anything about this in the help file for princomp(). See code below for an example: pc2$center is all NA's. Jerome Asselin x <- rnorm(6) y <- rnorm(6) X <- cbind(x,y)

Dear all The following process is about trying to do the " live migration at the same time with 5 Virtual machines ", but there is somthing problem with it. Process: yogi-pc2: # xm migrate --live vm01 pc2 & xm migrate --live vm02 pc2 & xm migrate --live vm03 pc2 & xm migrate --live vm04 pc2 & xm migrate --live vm05 pc2[1] 29983 [2] 29984 [3] 29985 [4]

Heloo! I have 3 Vpn with 3 servers! pc1 with debian and adr. for ex. 10.10.10.x pc2 with debian and adr. for ex. 10.10.10.y pc3 with debian and adr. for ex. 10.10.10.z On tinc i have pc1 connect to pc2 and pc3 pc2 connect to pc1 and pc3 pc3 connect to pc1 and pc3 Evrithing works fine but i whant to connect from home to this vpn but at my home i have a pppoe (no ip adr., i have user and pass to

I have two networked pcs. pc 1- RH8.0 which came with Samba-backend 1.0.8 and Samba 2.2.5 pc 2- XP Home I am able to access the shared folders from pc2 on pc1. However from pc2 I can not even see the ressources of pc1. In My Network Places/Entire Network/Microsoft Windows Network/"My Workgroup" I can see "pc1" but when I click on it I get an error message: \\"pc1"

Hello I was wondering if anyone has been able to change the pch value for points in 3dplot()? I am able to change point colors just not symbol types. I have included a portion of my code below. I realize this won't work outside of my script, but thought, maybe there is something obvious that I am doing wrong. Also is it possible to utilize the interactive feature of 3dplot in a

Hi there: I have this configuration: |-----[Server 2] | [Internet]--------[Router]----------[Switch]------------ [Server 1] | |-----[PC1] | |-----[PC2] | |-----[PC3] Server 1 has IP 216.251.XXX.XX1 Server 2 has IP 216.251.XXX.XX2 PC1 has IP 216.251.XXX.XX3 PC2 has IP 192.168.XXX.1 PC3 has IP 192.168.XXX.2 How do I configure shorewall in SERVER 2 to block to/from the Internet Port 22

I am testing EXT3 as a filesystem for a server whose power supply is failure prone. In order to do the test, I have a lever that I can control from PC1 that can press the reset button on PC2. PC2's reset button is automatically pressed once every 120 seconds (the boot sequence on PC2 takes 80 seconds). While PC2 is booted, PC1 directs email and web requests at PC2, so that the PC2 disks are

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20091125/bf6c327e/attachment-0001.pl>

Hello, not understanding the output of prcomp, I reduce the number of components and the output continues to show cumulative 100% of the variance explained, which can't be the case dropping from 8 components to 3. How do i get the output in terms of the cumulative % of the total variance, so when i go from total solution of 8 (8 variables in the data set), to a reduced number of

Hello R-friends, i have a question to the "text"-function. a little test-dataset for better understanding: -the dataset was imported with read.table(....,header=TRUE) s1-s10 are the samplenames var1 var2 var3 s1 1 1 2 s2 2 3 1 s3 2 2 3 s4 5 4 3 s5 4 2 3 s6 6 3 2 s7 8 5 4 s8 7 2 1 s9 9 3 2

Dear Tinc developer, I have some problems connecting to the other site of the VPN Here are my configuration files on pc1 Configuration files on pc2 /usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc.conf /usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc.conf Name = pc1 Name = pc2 TapDevice = /dev/tap0 TapDevice = /dev/tap0 PrivateKeyFile =

Hi, I am having difficulty entering a 'programmable' argument into the multinom function from the nnet package. Interactively, I can get the function to work fine by calling it this way: z1=multinom(formula = class.ind(grp[-outgroup])~ (PC1 + PC2 + PC3), data=data.frame(scores)) However I need to be able to change the number of variables I am looking for in 'scores' and so am

Hello! I'd like to create an assets-based economic indicator using data from a national household survey. The economic indicator is to be the first principal component from a principal components analysis, which (given the source of the data) I believe should take in consideration the sampling weights of the observations. After running the PCA with svyprcomp(), from the survey package, I

Hello Sir, I want some help from you. I have my configuration like this. I have three machines. PC1,PC2,PC3. hub hub PC1--------------------PC2-----------------------PC3 eth0 eth0,eth1 eth0 I want to work my configuration like diffserv. I am generating traffic from PC3 and sending it to PC1 via PC2(as a router)and from

Hi guys, I am new to R, so sorry if my problem seems trivial. Sometimes I encounter some lists, which I cannot index their components with [ . ] For instance the prcomp() function returns a 'prcomp' object whose components are some 'lists'. the second component is a list that comtains the following: > mylist <- churn[2] > class(mylist) [1] "list" >

Hi guys im trying to make a port redirecction using iproute together with iptables mangle option .. but for some strange reason is not working yet, I know i can do it in a diferent way, but the idea is using packet marking and redirect the packets with a rule. I have two computers PC1 and PC2 PC1: 192.168.0.1 this is the one connected to internet, and this machine make the redirection PC2:

Greets to the list! I am aware that this topic has been discussed several times. And I've read quite some related posts [1]. Yet, can't seem to give a solution to my problem. I have 6 data frames consisting of 6 rows x 7 columns put together from other data.frames. Something like: a b c d e f g v1 # # # # # # # v2 # # # # # # # v3 # # # # # # # v4 # # # # # # # v5 # # # # # # # v6

Hi guys, i have a problem with a configuration what i''m trying to do. I have two computers with linux, A and B, connected in the same network with this configuration: PC1 A: 192.168.192.1 PC2 B: 192.168.192.30 The PC1 A is a firewall doing nat... this one is connected to the internet via an adsl modem and of course it have its own public ip , and the router B is a smtp server but