similar to: Samba DC and DNS

07.04.2025 14:12, Vladimir Mokrozub via samba wrote: > Hello, I'm new to Samba DC and I have a question regarding DNS: > > we have DNS and DHCP servers, DNS dynamic updates are controlled by DHCP when clients request IP addresses. There're a lot of zones in DNS and we need > to create a domain in one of these zones. > If I understand correctly Samba can't use external

m?ndag 4 maj 2020 kl. 21:17:13 CEST skrev Rowland penny via samba: > > samba_dnsupdate can insert all the records from dns_update_cache, *except* > > the NS record for the _msdcs zone > > Not sure I understand that, by default a Samba AD DC has two zones: > samdom.example.com (DomainDnsZone) > _msdcs.samdom.example.com (ForestDnsZone) > > Both of which can be

Hi all, (Samba 4.9.5-Debian (buster) with BIND 9.11.5.P4) I'm wondering, is it really strictly necessary to use the built-in DNS backend or the BIND9 DLZ plugin, at least in a forest with no Windows Server DCs? The LDAP and Kerberos I can understand, but DNS is just a bunch of records, right? There are a number of records that need to be in place in order for clients to find the DCs and

19.12.2024 17:52, Peter Mittermayer via samba wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > I'm aware of the dns_update_cache file, and I saw it being generated when starting samba service for the first time. However, I don't understand when it gets updated. It gets updated when "something" changes in the DC. Your FSMO role transfer is one such example. > For example, I have

Hi Michael, I'm aware of the dns_update_cache file, and I saw it being generated when starting samba service for the first time. However, I don't understand when it gets updated. For example, I have added an additional DC to my domain and moved the PDC role to it for a while. So the line for PDC record was added to the file. Once I removed the PDC role the line in the file is still

Hi! There has been a few questions on the samba mailing list, some of which (eg https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14518) are reoccurring often, some aren't. And I, once again, want to remind that there's another approach to DNS in samba, which avoids all these and many other issues, but it requires a bit of work. The benefit is to have DNS under control again as in the old good

(oeps) this need to be in this mail also. Try : rgrep "dc.domain.at" /etc/* > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: L.P.H. van Belle > Verzonden: woensdag 31 juli 2019 12:17 > Aan: 'samba at lists.samba.org' > Onderwerp: RE: [Samba] GPO issues - getting SYSVOL cleaned up again > > Ok, on that server. > > This > >

I have an AD with 1 Samba DC and 5 Windows 10 clients. The DC and the clients all have a fixed IPv4 address. In the windows event viewer, I constantly see the following warning: Event 8019, DNS Client Events ------------------------------------------ The system failed to register host (A or AAA) resource records (RRs) for network adapter with settings: Adapter Name: {someGUID} Host Name:

Well, I have discovered the proximate cause of why samba-4.4 is not listening on 53. It is because the DNS service dies due to missing files in /var/db/samba4/private/. Specifically dns_update_list. There are a number of missing files in the samba error logs. No such file or directory: '/var/db/samba4/private/spn_update_list' No such file or directory:

On 16.11.2015 18:42, James wrote: > On 11/16/2015 12:18 PM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> >>>>> >>>> Is this with Samba internal DNS? What version of Samba? Your >>>> original OP stated this to be the issue. >>>> >>>> "The system failed to register host (A or AAA) resource records >>>> (RRs) for network

"--seize" helped: root at pre01svdeb03:~# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=PRE01SVDEB03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=pilsbacher,DC=at InfrastructureMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=PRE01SVDEB03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=pilsbacher,DC=at RidAllocationMasterRole owner:

On 16.11.2015 17:52, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/11/15 16:35, James wrote: >> On 11/16/2015 11:15 AM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 16.11.2015 16:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >>>> Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? >>>> >>>> Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client >>>>

On 08/27/2015 04:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 21:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>> Hello Jim, >>> >>> Am 27.08.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Jim Seymour: >>>> BIND would be the auth nameserver for example.com and delegate >>>> the samdom.example.com zone to

On 16/11/15 18:52, James wrote: > On 11/16/2015 1:46 PM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> >> >> On 16.11.2015 18:42, James wrote: >>> On 11/16/2015 12:18 PM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Is this with Samba internal DNS? What version of Samba? Your >>>>>> original OP stated this to be the

On 31/07/2019 11:40, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 31.07.19 um 12:32 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 31/07/2019 11:22, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>> "dc" was the old name a few years ago >>> >>> I try to get rid of that now. >>> >>> host -t A dc... not found. We want that in the end. >>>

Ok Mathias.. I hoop this helps a bit. https://technet.microsoft.com/nl-nl/library/cc816941(v=ws.10).aspx now type : nslookup -type=soa internal.domain.tld or nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld and look at nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld ip_of_a_NS1-server. nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld ip_of_a_NS2-server. And see.. The soa record contains only

For me: - SOA means where updates can be sent. - SOA can be one or several. - NS is a record to help non-authoritative name servers to find a valid name server for the zone they receive a request and they don't know anything about that zone. - SOA is often declared as NS, I agree. I explained this is not mandatory. There is no link between these two notions except they share a zone. You are

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2223 Bug ID: 2223 Summary: Ed25519 support in SSHFP DNS resource records Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

On 11/16/2015 11:15 AM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > > > On 16.11.2015 16:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >> Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? >> >> Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client >> objects after the 'leave'? >> >> Ole >> > > Yes, first and only. As I said, it's more or less a lab setup

On 08/27/2015 04:52 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 21:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/2015 04:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 27/08/15 21:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>>>> Hello Jim, >>>>> >>>>> Am