similar to: install nouveau in FreeBSD 8-CURRENT amd64

hail, I write just to make sure its dead. I've lost the first disk on a ZFS pool (jbod). Now I can't mount it with only the second disk. The first disk clicks to death :( [root@optimus ~]# zpool status pool: pool state: UNAVAIL status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue functioning. action: Attach the missing

hail, I have a soekris running an atom and 2GB RAM and ZFS using 7 drives, small capacity though, to test and study if I can make my home server this box and this way. It will be a simple server, three users tops. I followed the handbook and made the geli step on the disks: Geom name: label/zfs1.eli State: ACTIVE EncryptionAlgorithm: AES-XTS KeyLength: 128 Crypto: software UsedKey: 0 Flags:

hail, I have an old AthlonXP 1700+ running 7-STABLE: FreeBSD xxx 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Nov 13 23:54:59 BRT 2008 root@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386 where I have two 750GB Seagate SATA Disks. They are divided as two slices, around the first 120GB are gathered in gmirror, and what left is in gstripe. so that's whats going on. if the machine locks, and fsck comes to

I just merged drm (Direct Rendering) from HEAD. - Support for latest Intel chips - Support and fixes for many AMD/ATI chips r500 and below - Support AMD/ATI IGP based chips (rs690/rs485) - Lots of code cleanups - Lots of other fixes and changes since the existing drm is 2+ years old If you are experiencing a "garbled" screen with

Could a drm guru please have a look at kern/133554? Thanks, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/

hail, I have a 7-stable: [matheus@xxx /usr/home/matheus]$ uname -a FreeBSD xxx 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #2: Sun Jul 6 15:03:26 BRT 2008 root@lamneth:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx_7 i386 and there exists three geom things. gconcat status Name Status Components concat/concat0 UP ad4 ad5 gmirror status Name Status Components

hail, I partitioned the disk this way: fdisk da0 ******* Working on device /dev/da0 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=12161 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=12161 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size

Greetings, A fresh install of 7 followed by a cvsup to 7.2-PRE on the 26th results in an inability to build Xorg on the system. A cvsup only an hour ago provides no solution. An attempt at the following: cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg-minimal make produces the following error: ... checking pkg-config files for X11 are available... yes checking for LIBDRM... yes checking for DRI2PROTO... yes checking

I'm planning to ship nouveau drm in FreeBSD 8.0. In order to do that, I need to get copyright/license headers on a few files. The license I think is pretty straight forward, since I'll be using the usual MIT drm license. The following files don't seem to have headers at the moment and I would like to get this resolved soon, since we are approaching code freeze in a few days. ==>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11918 Summary: drmMap of framebuffer failed Product: Mesa Version: CVS Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: pmandin at

Hi all I'm new to the list, so I hope this si the right one to post too. I've setup a linux box with Samba and as a DHCP server. Now I find that Samba is very slow for access, is this normal or should it be relatively instant. Regards access I battle to get into the share full stop. I can see my share, the shared disk but when I try and access any of them it says it's unaccesible.

Stephen Clark wrote: > Robert Noland wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 07:48 -0500, Stephen Clark wrote: >>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>> Stephen Clark wrote: >>>>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>>> you will need to define the setup and question better. >>>> thanks.. cleaning it up a bit more... >>>> >>>>

Hi Rafael, Sure, the expansion of at least .cpload should be done in the Target ELFStreamer but AFAICS it doesn't solve my initial problem. MCCodeGenInfo is not created in tools where CodeGen isn't needed (llvm-mc) and it's still not possible to access the Relocation Model in MCObjectFileInfo from the target streamer (private member). Am I missing something obvious ? There are many

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Matheus Almeida <Matheus.Almeida at imgtec.com> wrote: >> Why Imagination Technologies do not offer the latest MIPS ABI document download link just like the ISA docs? > It's something we're considering to do and the documents should be available at some point in the [hopefully] not too distant future. > >> then why GCC disagree with

Thank you very much for your information and documents! Why Imagination Technologies do not offer the latest MIPS ABI document download link just like the ISA docs? If they thought no much people interested in that doc, they had to make greate effort on compiler like GCC,LLVM by themself,then why GCC disagree with some MIPS ABI, it should be freely designed by MIPS ABI designer and compiler

Hi Matheus, Thank you for your information! Do you known where do download MIPS ABI/EABI document? Thanks in advance! -- Best Regards, Yu Rong Tan On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Matheus Almeida <Matheus.Almeida at imgtec.com> wrote: > An assembler is the tool you're after. [And a linker if you want to have an executable in the end]. > > You can specify -filetype=obj to

For a target that hasn't implemented branch relaxation (yet), does anyone know what is the preferred way to report an error if a fixup cannot be applied because, for example, the destination of a branch is out of range? I suppose I could use asserts just like AArch64 is doing but that won't stop the assembler of emitting a branch to an undesired location in release builds. Does anyone see

Matheus, The ARM backend reports these kinds of errors using FatalError method of MCContext. You can see some examples in ARMAsmBackend.cpp (search for "out of range pc-relative fixup value"). -David From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Matheus Almeida Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 5:37 AM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Some Mips macros (e.g. la[1]) and the handling of Mips directives used for Position-Independent Programming (e.g. .cpload[2]) require access to Reloc::Model from within the Assembly Parser but there doesn't seem to be a way to do it in its current form. 1) Reloc::Model is passed to MCObjectFileInfo but it's a private member of that class 2) TargetMachine is not accessible I can also

> So in summary, each step is ABI compatible with the previous step. The linker will ensure that the end-user doesn't try to do the second step before the first step is finished since it will refuse to link a binary that contains both O32 and O32+fp64. It will produce an O32 binary given a combination of O32+fpxx, and similarly a O32+fp64 binary given a combination O32+fpxx and O32+fp64.