similar to: Proper use of this group?

Dear Centos-Virt: This is actually a second request for help on the same issue. I finally got to try what several months ago was replayed to me and no joy was to be had. I am afraid the original thread got stale and also had extra, unnecessary data in it. Guest=XP Pro, SP2 Host=CentOS5; # uname -r; 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 VirtualBox-1.5.0_24069_rhel5-2.i586.rpm

Hi All, I am trying to convert a customer over to Linux workstation, instead of upgrading to Windows 7. One last program to go. I can not get Access 2003 to work with CentOS 5.4's Wine 1.0.1. I am set to upgrade his test workstation to Fedora 12 and the latest Wine in a month or so. (Access 2003 crashed when you try to open a database.) Does anyone know if Access 2003 works in the latest

> -------- Original message -------- > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] Can I configure cores instead of CPU's > From: Todd And Margo Chester <toddandmargo at gmail.com> > To: "libvirt-users at redhat.com" <libvirt-users at redhat.com> > CC: > > > Hi All, > > Scientific Linux 6.1 x64 > qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.160.el6_1.2.x86_64 > > My XP-Pro

Hi All, I am working on a mystery. I am using openvpn-2.1_beta7-gui-1.0.3-install on all the computers in question. All computers are running XP-Pro-SP2. (Mine is running in a virtual window -- details below.) This configuration works perfectly from my office. I use it to call five facilities: remote aa.bb.cc.dd port 5030 proto udp dev tap ifconfig 192.168.240.30 255.255.255.0 secret

Hi All, Just wondering about winetricks. Is it still maintained? (Could not get ie7, ie8, or flash to install correctly.) -T

Hi All, I am using CentOS 5.4 (Old-Out-Of-Date) and $ rpm -qa samba\* samba-client-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1 samba-common-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1 samba-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1 On Thursday, at a customer's site, I did my CentOS updates and got the above sort-of-new version of Samba. Problem: when CentOS booted back up, suddenly the only thing anyone could get into was their "homes" share. If

Dear Centos-Virt: Help! Guest=XP Pro, SP2 Host=CentOS5; # uname -r; 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 VirtualBox-1.4.0_21864_rhel5-1.i586 http://www.virtualbox.org/download/1.5.0/VirtualBox-1.5.0_24069_rhel5-1.i586.rpm.run I have two nic: eth0 is the internal network; eth1 connects to a DSL modem. I also have a fully functioning DHCP server on eth0 (works perfectly with Parallels for Linux). The directions

On 08/19/2017 12:31 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 19:53:26 -0700 > toddandmargo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Fedora Core 26 >> >> # rpm -qa \*samba\* >> samba-common-4.6.7-0.fc26.noarch >> samba-common-libs-4.6.7-0.fc26.x86_64 >> samba-4.6.7-0.fc26.x86_64 >>

CentOS-6.2 What is the maximum number of cpus can I configure for a single vm guest running on a host with this hardware? # lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 4 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3 Thread(s) per core: 1 Core(s) per socket: 4 CPU socket(s): 1 NUMA node(s): 1 Vendor ID:

Hi I am getting this message when trying to install programs. So far with the game Sacred (stops installing altogether) and MS Project. Is there something simple I'm missing. Yes I am a total newb please be gentle. I have been Googling and searching everywhere for this info. Using Wine Suse 9.1 RPM 13082004 Should I use an earlier RPM? oh and btw shouldn't there be menu entries for

We have a Samba primary domain controller "empire", which seems to have DNS update issues. We can seem to query all records on empire just fine, and we can modify IPs for existing records, but it will not delete or add new records. Attempting to delete via the AD tools shows "Local security authority database contains an internal inconsistency". Adding a record on the command

On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:20:29 +0100 ash-samba--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > And to get it editable: > > > > ldbedit -e nano -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb --cross-ncs > > --show-binary -b > > 'DC=_ldap._tcp.pdc,DC=_msdcs.samdom.example.com,CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com' > > -s base > >

We appear to have some phantom DNS records on both our domain controllers. We can see the records using "dig", but not with samba-tool. We can't remove the records either. (v-ward and v-fief are the DCs, Hawaii and Alaska are old DCs which were demoted without errors, I'm trying to clean up some DNS records which don't seem to have been cleaned). All machines are

Hi All, What causes this error in /var/log/messages when on XP-Pro client boots up? winbindd[4041]: idmap uid range missing or invalid winbindd[4041]: idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs winbindd[4041]: [2009/04/02 19:38:22, 0] nsswitch/idmap.c:idmap_alloc_init(820) rn1 winbindd[4041]: ERROR: Initialization failed for alloc backend, deferred! Many thanks, -T

On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 15:41:24 -0400 lingpanda101--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 9/12/2016 3:23 PM, ash-samba--- via samba wrote: > > On 09/09/16 16:35, lingpanda101--- via samba wrote: > >> On 9/9/2016 10:59 AM, ash-samba--- via samba wrote: > >>> We appear to have some phantom DNS records on both our domain > >>> controllers.

The system described by https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-May/199829.html (Invalid data for index DN=@INDEX:OBJECTCLASS:DNSNODE) now appears to perform DNS updates correctly, all systems are 4.2.10-Debian, and we've been able to add a user and a new DC. (Thanks for the help!) Synchronisation between v-ward (the new local DC), and empire isn't entirely working, though. >

> OK, could this just be a permissions problem i.e. user 'ash' doesn't > have the required rights to add a dns record, try again, but this time > use the 'Administrator' user. I've repeated the "samba-tool dns add", and the "samba-tool domain join" commands with "-UAdministrator". I get the same errors with either user. (the error

On 17/05/16 12:11, ash-samba at comtek.co.uk wrote: > >> G'Day, >> >> This is a serious situation. What it means is that the nextRid value >> for that DC points at a user account that already exists, so when we >> go to create it, the create fails. > I've just looked at the LDAP output, and nextRid is 1000 for both dn: >

> This certainly sounds stressful. Yes! > Another way to (on a backup, particularly given your history above) remove the index is with samba-tool dbcheck --reindex. Re-indexing... completed re-index OK 0 root at empire:~[0] samba-tool dns add empire chester-dc.example.com p-cats A 10.4.4.142 -U ash Password for [CHESTER-DC\ash]: Record added successfully Thanks! > The missing

On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 16:41 +0100, ash-samba at comtek.co.uk wrote: > > > Andrew Bartlett > > I haven't actually got ldbdump on the machine, and I can't see it > > in > > the Debian packages. That said, I do appear to be able to add DNS > > records now, so I'm assuming it was the index. If you particularly > > want me to find out then I'll