similar to: Windows Server 2008 with the KVM --no-acpi option

Hi all, I have followed the wiki howto to install KVM on my C5 server with a F10 x86_64 guest. Howto here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM With one small problem here: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=74275&topic_id=19726 the guest is really running stable for one week now. Maybe someone could have a look at udev why it always sets permission for /dev/net/tun

hi, after a long time it seems the current packages which needed for kvm on centos-5 host seems to working (ie. worth to change). my repo: http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/SRPMS/ contains the current set of rpms what we use (about a week): ----------------------------- libvirt-0.6.0-1 python-virtinst-0.400.1-1 virt-manager-0.6.1-1 virt-top-1.0.1-7.el5 virt-viewer-0.0.3-3

may here someone can answer me... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.2 i386 and x86_64 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:31:20 +0200 From: Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel at centos.org> References: <4860E6EB.5000906 at centos.org> Karanbir Singh wrote: > > We are

hi, while all files is owned by nsd user and nsd run as nsd the nsd.db is still owned by root user (because the compiler run as root and create this file as root, ok i know just it'd be better if this file is owned by nsd too). another strange thing is that on the slave nsd i've got such messages: ----------------------------------------- zonec: reading zone "lfarkas.org".

Dear all, I've succesfully installed a F10 x86_64 KVM guest on C5 x86_64 with the help of the wiki - running for 7 days now. :) Two questions; What's the state of the lfarkas's repository - can it be trusted - I guess yes but google did not help much. It's only mentioned in the kvm howto - not under the third party repos. And sadly http://www.lfarkas.org/ is empty. Second q.

hi, I'm look around to find a usable imap server and find dovecot. I read all the docs, but I've got a few questions: - currently we use courier (since we find and install it quickly). can we switch from it to dovecot smoothly? or we have to convert the maildirs somehow? - I've got a few plan in my mind it it possible to do it with dovecot now or in the near future (if yes what

hi, i put together a mariadb rpm for el6. it seem to be much more complicated then i thought. the sources was: - Karanbir's mariadb for centos6 5.5.29 http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/mariadb/ unfortunately the link disappear a few days ago but i've got the src.rpm - rhel7 mariadb-5.5.33a-3.el7.src.rpm - fedora's mariadb-5.5.35-4.fc21.src.rpm - rhel6's scl's

hi, so yesterday I move the whole mail system to a better machine. the only thing which is running on this system is dovect and: -------------------------------------------------- 10:44am up 6 days, 25 min, 3 users, load average: 28.03, 17.96, 9.05 233 processes: 231 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU0 states: 3.1% user, 29.4% system, 0.0% nice, 66.4% idle CPU1 states: 7.1%

2009/10/15 Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> > hi, > i read your thread at: > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2009-January/003772.html > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2009-January/003775.html > we've got exactly the same problem that we need a nut driver for liebert > ups. is there any progress in this field?

# xm create -c vm01.cfg Error: Cannot open config file "vm01.cfg" www:/var/log/xen# xm create -c /etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg". Error: (22, 'Invalid argument') # xm log [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO (__init__:1072) Resource label file not found. [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO

How does one install a new vm behind a proxy? When I start the virt-install routine Xen seems to be unable to load information from the ftp/http sources. As a consequence, I tried to install from the DVD-iso as well as the file system. Xen then prompts "What type of media contains the packages to be installed?". After choosing ''hard drive'' it prompts that I do not seem

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386 Version: 3.0.2+hg9681-1 Severity: important Have been trying to get NetBSD to run under debian unstable with the debian supplied hypervisor. Using the 3.0.2-2 hypervisor supplied by XenSource, it works just fine. Because the install process overrides other things, reverified with debian hypervisor afterwards and symptom continues. Attaching the netbsd.cfg and the

----- Forwarded message from pakrat <pakrat@private.neotoma.org> ----- Forwarding to list without attachments. From: pakrat <pakrat@private.neotoma.org> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386: cannot start NetBSD-HEAD X-Neotoma-Consulting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Neotoma-Consulting-MailScanner-From:

Hi Does anyone know when KVM-70 or higher would be available in CentOs or CentoOS extras repository. (for version CentOS 5.x) The only place that I know of is here. http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/ Thanks /Jd

I am using the following commands to restrict download on an interface vm01 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev vm01 root handle 11: cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000 mpu 64 /sbin/tc class add dev vm01 parent 11:0 classid 11:1 cbq rate 1.5Kbit weight 1.5Kbit allot 1514 prio 1 avpkt 1000 bounded /sbin/tc filter add dev vm01 parent 11:0 protocol ip handle 4 fw flowid 11:1 When i do a qdisc show and class show,

Dear all I use the command( xm mem-set ID mem ) trying to understand the memory allocation between the Dom0 and the Guests(vm), but there is still some confusion about this. As the above /proc/xen/balloon list I set xm mem-set Domain-0 128 and changing the vm memory from 256 to 128: xm mem-set vm01 128 (...from vm01 to vm08) before mem-setCurrent allocation: 427792 kB

Hello, I must be missing something very very basic. Because I am having trouble launching some vm''s that I recently built whereas I don''t have any problem at all launching some older images I made in very much the same way! First there is vm01 which works just fine: [root@lcent5-1:/etc/xen]$:xm create vm01 Using config file "./vm01". Started domain vm01

Hello, I must be missing something very very basic. Because I am having trouble launching some vm''s that I recently built whereas I don''t have any problem at all launching some older images I made in very much the same way! First there is vm01 which works just fine: [root@lcent5-1:/etc/xen]$:xm create vm01 Using config file "./vm01". Started domain vm01

I can ssh into the Xen box over my LAN from another machine and I am logged in as vm01. But when I try to ssh in from work I can''t. I configured my router and I still cannot ssh into vm01. I know the sshd daemon is running because I can ssh locally. What could it be preventing me to ssh to vm01 remotely?? Thanks. Kashif _______________________________________________

Hello ! I yesterday updated one server to XEN 3.2 which was running 3.1.2 before. The default bridge setup stopped working (Guests network packets were not forwarded to physical ethernet connection on eth0) My bridge setup looked like this: root@quadxeon2:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces eth0 8000.003048359fc0 no