similar to: Updated dom0 pvops for 2.6.24 available on git

Hi folks, I've finished off Xen dma support for pv_ops, and dom0 now boots! I've had an uptime of 40 minutes so far with it. Under intensive disk load it locks up with a soft lockup, but still, this is good progress. I've pushed the current bits to the "WIP" (work-in-progress) branch at the usual git repo, git://et.redhat.com/linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git with gitweb at

Hi folks, I've finished off Xen dma support for pv_ops, and dom0 now boots! I've had an uptime of 40 minutes so far with it. Under intensive disk load it locks up with a soft lockup, but still, this is good progress. I've pushed the current bits to the "WIP" (work-in-progress) branch at the usual git repo, git://et.redhat.com/linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git with gitweb at

Hi folks, I've finished off Xen dma support for pv_ops, and dom0 now boots! I've had an uptime of 40 minutes so far with it. Under intensive disk load it locks up with a soft lockup, but still, this is good progress. I've pushed the current bits to the "WIP" (work-in-progress) branch at the usual git repo, git://et.redhat.com/linux-2.6-dom0-pvops.git with gitweb at

Hi guys, The PV ABI of xen will clear CR0.TS before trapping into the PV guest kernel's exception handler, so the exception handler in guest kernel runs with CR0.TS clear at the very beginning (which is different with on baremetal). In Xenolinux and mainline Linux kernel before 2.6.26 everything is fine since they don't sleep nor enable interrupts during the handler, however the current

Hi guys, The PV ABI of xen will clear CR0.TS before trapping into the PV guest kernel's exception handler, so the exception handler in guest kernel runs with CR0.TS clear at the very beginning (which is different with on baremetal). In Xenolinux and mainline Linux kernel before 2.6.26 everything is fine since they don't sleep nor enable interrupts during the handler, however the current

Hi All. I''m trying to use xenoprof in my Xeon machine with PVOPS (3.1.0 kernel) & xen 4.1.1. In the past, I had failed to use the xenoprof in this environment. (1 year ago) While baremetal booting shows the counter object in /dev/oprofile/0 (or 1,2,3) , booting with xen fails to create those objects. Of course, opcontrol command doesn''t work. It only prints

Hello, I''m using Debian Lenny with Xen 4.0.1 with standard 2.6.32.25 kernel In my new server after some period of running I got 100% usage of udev process and I can''t stop it. I upgraded to the newest libc and udev but the problem is here again. Here dmesg and pastebin http://pastebin.com/JNJPFSHz [1] [229995.580221] ------------[ cut here

Jeremy, This one looks quite familiar. I think I pointed this one out to you the first time I started working on pv-ops (so, June/July?) and you had a fix for it, but I can''t remember the details (except that you did ask me to review it, and I did, but I didn''t send any details back). Any ideas? This is against xen/next as of today with this commit being at the top: commit

This one about pvops kernel 2.6.32.24 under Xen 4.0.1 on top of Ubuntu 10.10 Desktop http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/set-up-xen-4-0-1-libvirt-0-8-3-on-top-of-ubuntu-10-10-desktop/ Boris. --- On Thu, 10/21/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> wrote: From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel To:

I compiled the pvops kernel like this : [root@localhost xen-4.0.0]# ls buildconfigs config Config.mk.orig dist extras install.sh Makefile README tools xen build-linux-2.6-pvops_x86_32 Config.mk COPYING docs file linux-2.6-pvops.git messages stubdom unmodified_drivers [root@localhost build-linux-2.6-pvops_x86_32]# make -j2 bzImage

I compiled the pvops kernel like this : [root@localhost xen-4.0.0]# ls buildconfigs config Config.mk.orig dist extras install.sh Makefile README tools xen build-linux-2.6-pvops_x86_32 Config.mk COPYING docs file linux-2.6-pvops.git messages stubdom unmodified_drivers [root@localhost build-linux-2.6-pvops_x86_32]# make -j2 bzImage

Hello, I just wrote a step-by-step tutorial how to install the latest Xen 4.0.1 hypervisor on Fedora 13 (x86_64) host from src.rpm packages, and the pvops dom0 kernel from git repository. Check it out: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Fedora13Xen4Tutorial It also shows how to install various Xen PV guests using the native distro installers: - CentOS 5.5 - Fedora 13 - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS

Hello, I just wrote a step-by-step tutorial how to install the latest Xen 4.0.1 hypervisor on Fedora 13 (x86_64) host from src.rpm packages, and the pvops dom0 kernel from git repository. Check it out: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Fedora13Xen4Tutorial It also shows how to install various Xen PV guests using the native distro installers: - CentOS 5.5 - Fedora 13 - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS

Hi everybody, I wanted to test the new hypervisor Xen 4.0.0 with the pvops kernel 2.6.31.13 version 64 bit No concerns regarding the compilation and installation, but after install a Windows 2003 server 32 bit I can''t install the drivers gplpv_2003x32_0.11.0.213.msi i had an error: "There is a problem with this Windows Installer package" see attachment Before, i had the

I''ve been having some fun recently with trying to get a stock upstream kernel working, compiled with support for both baremetal and PV booting. This is with a view to getting a similar configuration into the Xensource automated test setup. Since I''ve just got such a kernel to boot a Fedora 8 PV guest I thought I''d share what I did, as there are a couple of tricks to

To speed up paravirtualized spinlock handling when running on bare metal introduce a new pvops function "clear_slowpath". This is a nop when the kernel is running on bare metal. As the clear_slowpath function is common for all users add a new initialization function to set the pvops function pointer in order to avoid spreading the knowledge which function to use. Signed-off-by: Juergen

Hi, Jeremy and all This small patch lets pv ops guest handle machine check trap. When non fatal mce error happens, xen will inject vMCE# to the impacted pv ops guest. This patch allows pv ops guest could receive machine check trap and enter its own machine check handler. Thanks & Regards, Criping >From 5efc12fe8214d55e2becc2c4b6ec4a30531d7b60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liping Ke

Dear All, I am currently trying out Xen 4.0.0 with Ubuntu Lucid as Dom 0 with a pv ps kernel, and I can get it to boot and run lucid as dom0 perfectly well in console mode, however, I am unable to start X11. Looking here I can see there are problems with pvops kernels and X11. http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPVOPSDRM . Would a summary of the page http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPVOPSDRM

Hi does someone have fglrx running with xen4.0 and pvops 2.6.32 kernel? I can compile the fglrx module but after I start X it crashes (black screen) and I need to power off... Any tricks/hints? -- Greetz _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, Is netconsole supposed to work under pvops? When I try to enable it I get the following: Initialising Xen virtual ethernet driver. blkfront: xvda1: barriers enabled netconsole: local port 11111 netconsole: local IP 10.20.40.2 netconsole: interface eth1 netconsole: remote port 9514 netconsole: remote IP 10.20.50.2 netconsole: remote ethernet address 00:16:3e:00:50:02 netconsole: eth1