Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] Always notify a virtio_ring when it's full"
2009 Aug 18
2
[PATCH 1/2] virtio: Add a can_add_buf helper
This helper returns 1 if a call to add_buf will not fail
with -ENOSPC.
This will help callers that do
while(1) {
alloc()
if (add_buf()) {
free();
break;
}
}
This will result in one less alloc/free exercise.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/virtio.h | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 13
2009 Aug 18
2
[PATCH 1/2] virtio: Add a can_add_buf helper
This helper returns 1 if a call to add_buf will not fail
with -ENOSPC.
This will help callers that do
while(1) {
alloc()
if (add_buf()) {
free();
break;
}
}
This will result in one less alloc/free exercise.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/virtio.h | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 13
2008 Jan 27
1
[PATCH] virtio_net tx performance fix
>From f582caf612b446e42f1e80d5ef12c5b7322efd03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:09:48 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] virtio_net tx performance fix
There was a problem with the location of the notify call in
add_buff function:
When VRING_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY is set, the host does not kick the
guest when packets were transmitted, as a result the
2008 Jan 27
1
[PATCH] virtio_net tx performance fix
>From f582caf612b446e42f1e80d5ef12c5b7322efd03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:09:48 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] virtio_net tx performance fix
There was a problem with the location of the notify call in
add_buff function:
When VRING_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY is set, the host does not kick the
guest when packets were transmitted, as a result the
2008 May 26
1
[PATCH] virtio_rng: dont use vmalloced addresses for virtio
If virtio_rng is build as a module, random_data is an address in vmalloc
space. As virtio expects guest real addresses, this can cause any kind of
funny behaviour, so lets allocate random_data dynamically with kmalloc.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
---
drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
2008 May 26
1
[PATCH] virtio_rng: dont use vmalloced addresses for virtio
If virtio_rng is build as a module, random_data is an address in vmalloc
space. As virtio expects guest real addresses, this can cause any kind of
funny behaviour, so lets allocate random_data dynamically with kmalloc.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
---
drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
2010 Apr 12
10
[PATCH 0/6] virtio: virtqueue ops cleanup
virtqueue ops were introduced in the hope that we'll
have multiple implementations besides virtio_ring,
but none have surfaced so far, and given that
existing virtio ring is deployed in production
we are likely stuck with it now, so this layer just
adds complexity and overhead.
Further, the need to pass vq twice to each call
(as in dev->vq->vq_ops->kick(dev->vq) ) adds potential
2010 Apr 12
10
[PATCH 0/6] virtio: virtqueue ops cleanup
virtqueue ops were introduced in the hope that we'll
have multiple implementations besides virtio_ring,
but none have surfaced so far, and given that
existing virtio ring is deployed in production
we are likely stuck with it now, so this layer just
adds complexity and overhead.
Further, the need to pass vq twice to each call
(as in dev->vq->vq_ops->kick(dev->vq) ) adds potential
2009 Aug 19
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio: Add a can_add_buf helper
This helper returns 1 if a call to add_buf will not fail
with -ENOSPC.
This will help callers that do
while(1) {
alloc()
if (add_buf()) {
free();
break;
}
}
This will result in one less alloc/free exercise.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com>
---
v2:
return true/false instead of 1/0
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/virtio.h |
2009 Aug 19
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio: Add a can_add_buf helper
This helper returns 1 if a call to add_buf will not fail
with -ENOSPC.
This will help callers that do
while(1) {
alloc()
if (add_buf()) {
free();
break;
}
}
This will result in one less alloc/free exercise.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com>
---
v2:
return true/false instead of 1/0
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/virtio.h |
2009 Sep 21
0
[PATCH 2/6] virtio: make add_buf return capacity remaining
This API change means that virtio_net can tell how much capacity
remains for buffers. It's necessarily fuzzy, since
VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC means we can fit any number of descriptors
in one, *if* we can kmalloc.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Dinesh Subhraveti <dineshs at us.ibm.com>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
2009 Sep 21
0
[PATCH 2/6] virtio: make add_buf return capacity remaining
This API change means that virtio_net can tell how much capacity
remains for buffers. It's necessarily fuzzy, since
VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC means we can fit any number of descriptors
in one, *if* we can kmalloc.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Dinesh Subhraveti <dineshs at us.ibm.com>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
2007 Jul 03
6
[PATCH 1/3] Virtio draft IV
In response to Avi's excellent analysis, I've updated virtio as promised
(apologies for the delay, travel got in the way).
===
This attempts to implement a "virtual I/O" layer which should allow
common drivers to be efficiently used across most virtual I/O
mechanisms. It will no-doubt need further enhancement.
The details of probing the device are left to hypervisor-specific
2007 Jul 03
6
[PATCH 1/3] Virtio draft IV
In response to Avi's excellent analysis, I've updated virtio as promised
(apologies for the delay, travel got in the way).
===
This attempts to implement a "virtual I/O" layer which should allow
common drivers to be efficiently used across most virtual I/O
mechanisms. It will no-doubt need further enhancement.
The details of probing the device are left to hypervisor-specific
2011 Sep 07
3
[RFC v2 0/2] virtio: Support releasing lock during kick
This patch allows virtio-blk to release its block queue lock while kicking the
host. This improves scalability on SMP guests who would otherwise spin on the
lock while another vCPU is kicking the host.
This approach can be used for other virtio devices too. It simply splits the
virtqueue_kick() operation into a prepare step which requires that the lock be
held and the actual notify step which
2011 Sep 07
3
[RFC v2 0/2] virtio: Support releasing lock during kick
This patch allows virtio-blk to release its block queue lock while kicking the
host. This improves scalability on SMP guests who would otherwise spin on the
lock while another vCPU is kicking the host.
This approach can be used for other virtio devices too. It simply splits the
virtqueue_kick() operation into a prepare step which requires that the lock be
held and the actual notify step which
2010 Jun 23
4
[RFC] virtio: Support releasing lock during kick
The virtio block device holds a lock during I/O request processing.
Kicking the virtqueue while the lock is held results in long lock hold
times and increases contention for the lock.
This patch modifies virtqueue_kick() to optionally release a lock while
notifying the host. Virtio block is modified to pass in its lock. This
allows other vcpus to queue I/O requests during the time spent
2010 Jun 23
4
[RFC] virtio: Support releasing lock during kick
The virtio block device holds a lock during I/O request processing.
Kicking the virtqueue while the lock is held results in long lock hold
times and increases contention for the lock.
This patch modifies virtqueue_kick() to optionally release a lock while
notifying the host. Virtio block is modified to pass in its lock. This
allows other vcpus to queue I/O requests during the time spent
2010 Jun 06
5
[PATCH] virtio_net: indicate oom when addbuf returns failure
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:28:56AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> This patch is a subset of an already upstream patch, but this portion
> is useful in earlier releases.
>
> Please consider for the 2.6.32 and 2.6.33 stable trees.
>
> If the add_buf operation fails, indicate failure to the caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers <brogers at novell.com>
>
2010 Jun 06
5
[PATCH] virtio_net: indicate oom when addbuf returns failure
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:28:56AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> This patch is a subset of an already upstream patch, but this portion
> is useful in earlier releases.
>
> Please consider for the 2.6.32 and 2.6.33 stable trees.
>
> If the add_buf operation fails, indicate failure to the caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers <brogers at novell.com>
>