similar to: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: ia64/pv_ops: ia64 intrinsics paravirtualization

Hi. This patchset implements xen/ia64 domU support. Qing He and Eddie Dong also has been woring on pv_ops so that I want to discuss before going further and avoid duplicated work. I suppose that Eddie will also post his own patch. So reviewing both patches, we can reach to better pv_ops interface. - I didn't changed the ia64 intrinsic paravirtulization abi from the last post. Presumably it

Hi. This patchset implements xen/ia64 domU support. Qing He and Eddie Dong also has been woring on pv_ops so that I want to discuss before going further and avoid duplicated work. I suppose that Eddie will also post his own patch. So reviewing both patches, we can reach to better pv_ops interface. - I didn't changed the ia64 intrinsic paravirtulization abi from the last post. Presumably it

This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a

This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:27:45PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > Here's the latest version of my patch series enabling ioeventfds > on s390, again against kvm-next. > > Patches 1 and 2 (cleaning up initialization and exporting the virtio-ccw > api) would make sense even independent of the ioeventfd enhancements. > > Patches 3-5 are concerned with adding a new type of

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:27:45PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > Here's the latest version of my patch series enabling ioeventfds > on s390, again against kvm-next. > > Patches 1 and 2 (cleaning up initialization and exporting the virtio-ccw > api) would make sense even independent of the ioeventfd enhancements. > > Patches 3-5 are concerned with adding a new type of

The following patches shave some rough edges off the tools build system to allow cross compiling for at least arm32 and arm64 based on the Debian/Ubuntu multiarch infrastructure. They also add the necessary fixes to build for arm64 (which I have only tried cross, not native). I have posted some instructions on how to compile with these patches on the wiki:

Hi Xiantao, More comments. Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 696b9eea9f5001a7b7a07c0e58514aa10306b91a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:51:36 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add head files for kvm/ia64 > > ia64_regs: some defintions for special registers > which aren't defined in

Hi Xiantao, More comments. Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>From 696b9eea9f5001a7b7a07c0e58514aa10306b91a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang at intel.com> > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:51:36 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM:IA64 : Add head files for kvm/ia64 > > ia64_regs: some defintions for special registers > which aren't defined in

> I''m not mad keen on propagating these sorts of asm atomic operations throughout > our code base. Other options would be: gcc has atomic builtins to do this kind of work. I don''t know about arm, but they do the job in x86 http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.1/gcc/Atomic-Builtins.html so atomic_inc(val) -> __sync_fetch_and_add(val, 1) and likewise for dec/sub Andres