similar to: paravirt_ops support in IA64

I want to analyse data with an unordered, multi-level outcome variable, y. I am asking for the appropriate method (or R procedure) to use for this analysis. > N <- 500 > set.seed(1234) > data0 <- data.frame(y = as.factor(sample(LETTERS[1:3], N, repl = T, + prob = c(10, 12, 14))), x1 = sample(1:7, N, repl = T, prob = c(8, + 8, 9, 15, 9, 9, 8)), x2 = sample(1:7, N, repl =

Hi, All How do I install Zaptel drivers on a system running Suse? Make results: grep: /lib/modules/2.6.16.13-4-smp/build/include/linux/autoconf.h: No existe el fichero o el directorio make[1]: Entering directory /usr/src/asterisk/zaptel/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2 make -C /lib/modules/2.6.16.13-4-smp/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/asterisk/zaptel/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2 modules make[2]: Entering directory

When CONFIG_SMP=n, three instruction in ivt.S were missed to paravirtualize. paravirtualize them. Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> --- arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S b/arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S index 416a952..f675d8e

move interrupt, page_fault, non_syscall, dispatch_unaligned_handler and dispatch_to_fault_handler to avoid lack of instructin space. The change set 4dcc29e1574d88f4465ba865ed82800032f76418 bloated SAVE_MIN_WITH_COVER, SAVE_MIN_WITH_COVER_R19 so that it bloated the functions which uses those macros. In the native case, only dispatch_illegal_op_fault had to be moved. When paravirtualized case the

move interrupt, page_fault, non_syscall, dispatch_unaligned_handler and dispatch_to_fault_handler to avoid lack of instructin space. The change set 4dcc29e1574d88f4465ba865ed82800032f76418 bloated SAVE_MIN_WITH_COVER, SAVE_MIN_WITH_COVER_R19 so that it bloated the functions which uses those macros. In the native case, only dispatch_illegal_op_fault had to be moved. When paravirtualized case the

>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:55:26 +0200 writes: > On 06.06.2017 22:14, Kirill M?ller wrote: >> >> >> On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> on

Rainer, Arjen I was wandering around the code, and found that few things are missing around the IVT code: - no manpage, - no entry in driver.list - no device{mfr,model,type} in the code. I was about to submit a patch to address the above (ready to commit), but wanted first to get an update on the status. looking at the last thread, it's a bit unclear... I'm also interested an upsc

Not sure why R_has_methods_attached() exists. Maybe Martin could shed some light on that. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> wrote: > Thanks for looking into it, your approach sounds good to me. See also > R_has_methods_attached() >

hi, I'm using the SCD-20 solar controller from IVT Gmbh in combination with a 230Ah battery and a photovoltaic panel to power a small server based on an Intel ATOM N270 CPU. the controller is (will be) connected to the server via RS232 (1200 8n1) and works like this: - if the battery voltage drops below 12V, a warning LED is switched on - if the battery voltage drops below 10.5V, the load

Right, R_has_methods_attached() uses that. Probably not the right check, since it refers to S4 dispatch, while S4_extends() is used by S3 dispatch. Perhaps S4_extends() should force load the methods package? The above example works after fixing the check to ensure that R_MethodsNamespace is not R_GlobalEnv, but one could load a serialized S4 object and expect S3 dispatch to work with Rscript. On

See also .isMethodsDispatchOn, which is what trace uses to decide if the methods package needs to be loaded. ~G On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com > wrote: > Not sure why R_has_methods_attached() exists. Maybe Martin could shed > some light on that. > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Kirill M?ller > <kirill.mueller at

This might be too big a change - but is it worth reconsidering the behaviour of Rscript? Maybe the simplest fix would be simply to always load the methods package. (I think historically it didn't because loading methods took a long time, but that is no longer true) Hadley On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> wrote: > Does it make sense to be

I have a long equation that I need to break in the R documentation of a package or it trails off the right hand side of the page. Here's the formula: \deqn{Cov(r_{ist}, r_{iuv})= [.5\rho_{ist}\rho_{iuv}(\rho_{isu}^2 + \rho_{isv}^2 + \rho_{itu}^2 + \rho_{itv}^2) + \rho_{isu}\rho_{itv}+ \rho_{isv}\rho_{itu}-(\rho_{ist}\rho_{isu}\rho_{isv} + \rho_{its}\rho_{itu}\rho_{itv}) +

Does it make sense to be able to load an S4 object without the methods package being attached? I'm not sure implementation-wise how easy this would be, but it seems like any time there is an S4 object around, the methods package should be available to deal with it. ~G On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com > wrote: > Right,

On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> >>>>>> on Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:30:20 +0200 writes: > > Hi I've noted a minor inconsistency in the documentation: > > Current R-exts reads > > > s = PROTECT_WITH_INDEX(eval(OS->R_fcall, OS->R_env), &ipx);

Thanks for looking into it, your approach sounds good to me. See also R_has_methods_attached() (https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/42ecf5f492a005f5398cbb4c9becd4aa5af9d05c/src/main/objects.c#L258-L265). I'm fine with Rscript not loading "methods", as long as everything works properly with "methods" loaded but not attached. -Kirill On 19.04.2016 04:10, Michael

Is there a way for isolinux/syslinux to execute a list of comboot files immediately at startup, and only once? I have a bunch of small comboot .com files that I want to batch run immediately, then after that do a DISPLAY boot.msg similar in some ways to an autoexec.bat. For example: DEFAULT mycd APPEND ramdisk_size=100000 init=/etc/init lang=us .... TIMEOUT 300 ONSTARTUP mybatch <- ???

Hi List; How can I convert some digits to another digits, and how I can insert in the end or in the begining some digits, for example: If I have a number like 11336784888, then I need to replace each digit of value 1 by 5, how? Also how can I add digits to the numbers like adding 00 in the beginning, so the dialed number becoming: 0011336784888 or adding digits (like 99) in the end of the

I'm trying to load Affy Annotation data from an Access database into R using RODBC. This has worked fine for quite some time. The bug seems to be correlated to RODBC versions 1.1-7 and later. Works fine: R 2.2.0 with RODBC 1.1-4; R 2.3.0 or R 2.4.1 with RODBC 1.1-6 Fails: R 2.3.1 with RDOBC 1.1-7; R 2.4.1 with RODC 1.1-7 or 1.1-8 Details ===== This works fine: Version 2.2.0

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> wrote: > Hi > > > I haven't found a way to produce a tabulation from factor data with NA > values using xtabs. Please find a minimal example below, it's also on R-pubs > [1]. Tested with R 3.1.2 and R-devel r67720. > > It doesn't seem to be documented explicitly that